The new site: feedback so far

Posted by ,

Thank you everyone for your feedback. There has been an overwhelming amount both as comments to yesterday's article, in the forum and via the feedback form. There have been over 400 responses via the form which is fantastic, although I have to admit I haven't read much of it yet. I've knocked up a quick and dirty page to enable you to view it yourself if you're interested (without names, of course).

It's because you're all so passionate about Brickset that you've taken the time to tell me what you think, and I appreciate that. I am committed to the change, but I am also committed to ensuring that you, the user, are happy with it before it goes live.. However, it won't be possible to please everyone and for that I apologise.

There seem to be a few common themes among the most vocal of those that don't like it much and they are:

  • Everything's too big on my desktop
  • I don't like the fonts
  • I miss the 'new in the database/at shop.LEGO.com' on the home page
  • When viewing set lists, not many fit on the page because the images are too big

So, here's what I'm going to do about these points:

  • The overall design will remain as it is. It is bigger, there is more white space, but in my opinion, as a result, you can read it much more easily, which you can really appreciate if you go back and read this article on the old site: the text looks tiny!
  • The font used for headings and hyperlinks, Arvo, is a nice-enough font, and on high-resolution phones and tablets it renders very well indeed and looks great. However on desktops which are comparatively lower in resolution, particularly PCs, some letters looks awful: lower case s and w in particular, and the 34pt used for headings of news articles was also bad. I've now reduced that to 28pt and it does look better although a little on the small side compared to the rest of the design. I'm going to work with the designer on a solution to this, which will probably be to use another font. If you are a designer and have any opinions on this, get in touch by email. The body font, noto-sans looks good on all devices, and will remain.
  • It looks as if I'm going to find a way to add new in the database/at shop.LEGO.com back somehow. The information is in the sidebar and there are links at the end of the window to this information, but that doesn't seem to be enough for many of you!
  • I'm going to provide a fourth view, to go along with the list view, gallery view and table view when viewing set lists which will be 'classic view' and I'll try and replicate the list view on the current site as closely as possible.

Do keep your comments coming. I have thick skin, I can take it... :)

74 comments on this article

Gravatar
By in United Kingdom,

I think it should have a more blocky, Lego-y appearance (Kind of like the current one).

Gravatar
By in United States,

Will the old site still be active?

Gravatar
By in United States,

When's the prize drawing?

Gravatar
By in United States,

Have you tried changing your monitor resolution settings to view the new site? I know I have made a few apps that were sized for a larger widescreen and worked great, but because I didn't code for those smaller and less capable than my own box, it sucked on those machines.
Edit : The new site on a 24" widescreen (1920 x 1080 1080p) looks great.

Gravatar
By in United Kingdom,

Glad to see the top things you listed Huw were the exact things I was going to mention and I wasn't alone in not being keen on the font and size and missing the new listings.

I think the only other thing for me was that the lack of solid lines dividing anything doesn't give clear separation between the components of the page such that they all kind of melt into one whereas the blocks on the existing site are clearly defined and clearly separated. I suspect this problem could largely be solved with a font size shrink though - it just feels a bit like everything on the new site is fighting for your attention at once, whilst nothing on the existing site does and it's upto you to focus on what you want.

I have a large monitor but I work with multiple windows so I never display websites in a maximised window or full screen.

Gravatar
By in United States,

Can you do a different, less 'white' background? I mentioned this in the report, but I suppose it wasn't supposed to go there. I think the blue background you've got now on Brickset would work well. It's iconic, IMO, and as side-bars it looks really nice.

Something else. I'm going to add my voice to the cocamphony of people that wants the 'new in the database/at lego.com' stuff back on the homepage.

^2nd paragraph

Yes! I complained about the same exact thing during the earlier testing, but you've summed it up quite nicely. Considering that Huw did nothing to fix the issue, and thinking that it was unsolvable/he didn't want to do anytihng about it, I didn't mention it. But JSYK, Huw, I've still got a small problem with it.

Gravatar
By in United States,

I think it looks fantastic. As browsers become more flexible in terms of viewing options, clean, simple, and open is much to my liking. The new design looks much more like a printed document; more of a timeless appeal to me. Coming back to the old site makes t look very 10 years ago. I love the new page.

Gravatar
By in United States,

This new site is growing on me... I just have a tiny suggestion: Maybe put studs on the tabs like "Browse," "My Sets," etc. I just think it might be a nice touch. :)

Gravatar
By in Italy,

Maybe it's beacuse I have a 24" monitor, but I can't see anything "too big". nd there's nothing wrong with the fonts.

Gravatar
By in United States,

Would it be too much to offer a choice of background, maybe classic blue, new white, and a couple other Lego-related options (city, space, castle come to mind), like gmail or twitter can do?

Gravatar
By in United States,

Everything new takes getting used to. Overall I like the new look and feel, and I'm sure after a few tweeks here & there, a little time, and then most users will not want to look back at what was.

I like the larger font. Much easier on my older (over 50) eyes. My only gripe is - is the font color a gray/grey? For me it seems a tad 'fuzzy' - i.e. maybe not as crisp as if it were black? Or maybe it's just my eyesight...lol

I did a quick check on my Android phone (Samsung Galaxy S4) and it looks good. It seemed very easy to read and navigate. Will spend more time with it to check it out better.

Gravatar
By in United States,

I'm a 15 year IT pro with programming experience, but not design. I did run the new site by some designer friends of mine, and they all liked it. Just FYI... :)

Gravatar
By in United Kingdom,

Typically blackboards worked in schools due to the easier light writing on dark and when whiteboards were introduced, headaches, eye strain, prescription glasses use and seizures increased in children. From then ...

Ok I made all that up :) maybe some happens to be true?

But seriously I have photosensitive epilepsy and the Apple and PC visual aids offered are never subtle nor do they work on all websites so its great when a site lets you choose your own background because white makes things harder to read in my opinion, give me a blackboard any day. Even this strip of white on the old site gets too much for me.

Ok I could get shades but do other people have a general sensitivity too?

Gravatar
By in New Zealand,

I hate the new brickset!!
1.You Can Buy Sets
2.There Are no Comments
3.Of our a visitor the my sets will be there but they will have no brickset account
4.Where is the "Home" Button

Gravatar
By in United Kingdom,

I quite like the new Brickset, it looks a lot better in White rather then Blue :D

Gravatar
By in United States,

^^ I'm not Huw, but I can answer those.

1. You can buy sets on this version also. But what's wrong with that?
2. Yes there are. You go to them just as you do normal.
3. What?
4. Just click the Logo on the top left.

Gravatar
By in Venezuela,

I really prefer the new text size, it is better for my eyes!!, thanks

Gravatar
By in New Zealand,

Sorry Huw
But the rest of it is pretty good

Gravatar
By in United Kingdom,

is there a news feature on the site, i couldn't find it?

Gravatar
By in United States,

Those problems are ridiculous. Those people obviously don't know what a good website is. This new design is awesome and I hope it doesn't change.

Gravatar
By in United States,

To quote from the redesign of Fark.com a number of years ago: 'You'll get over it'

I think all of the changes are for the best. The site looks cleaner, more modern, the larger fonts and contrasting colors look good.

Responsive design is critical for new sites. As someone that works on building corporate benefits websites, everything has to be viewable on a mobile/tablet environment, and doing things responsively makes it easier to maintain as there is only a single codebase, not a www.brickset.com as well as a mobile.brickset.com codebase.

2 thumbs up.

Gravatar
By in Rwanda,

would it be possible to have qty on the i wanted tick box, maybe default at 1 when ticked but you can add more?

Gravatar
By in Spain,

drop-down menus are unusable in Windows 8 tablets (ATIV Pro, Surface Pro, etc... ) when using fingers instead of mouse, so you can't easily access to all content in the web. (ie. when you click on "browse" you go to a page that only has a subset of the elements in the drop-down Browse menu)

Gravatar
By in Canada,

I hate change in general... so naturally I'm grumpy about hearing that Brickset is getting a facelift. I don't really like the new brickset website, because it is too "21st century". I don't like how all the imformation; like giant pictures and extra panels along the side (with unrelated crapola) overload my computerscreen... which is to say that it confuses my eyes because everything is so distracting against the white backdrop.

There is a lot of white... and I found when I was browsing the sets via 'list' that it seemed like I was using a shopping website. I use brickset to browse, not to buy! So I don't really like all the "Buy it" and " find it on Ebay" options which tormenting me like some in-store sales clerk who's off his Ritalin.

Sorry, I just like things simple... not the "in your face , eye-popping, brain overload" kids seem to find attractive. I didn't think the website needed updating. I mean webtraffic is up, so it's not like this fan community has fallen on hard times.

Gravatar
By in United States,

I like this size font - but too big is better than too small IMO, and as far as on a desktop I can just zoom out, so no biggie there (I usually have it on 90% zoom anyways). Also fourth viewing option for set lists that's more akin to the old version sounds excellent!
Great work Huw!

Gravatar
By in United States,

There should be an option to say what kind of conditions the Owned sets are in and how many minifigures you own of the set as some could have been sold or traded.

Gravatar
By in United Kingdom,

I reviewed Flyer Beast vs Breez on the new website and it worked fine, but just one question once I press Save
Is it submitted? :)

Gravatar
By in United Kingdom,

@Darth_Maul_Epic - You can use the ACM to add additional information about owned sets.

@Patch22 - When you press 'Save' the review is sent for moderation. Once approved by a member of staff it will appear on the set detail page.

Gravatar
By in Canada,

I like it but one thing bugs me, I like how I can view each theme's year separately and then click one of the buttons at the top or bottom of the page to go to the next year. In the new layout it seems you need to select a year from a menu?

Gravatar
By in United Kingdom,

love it !

it's fresh, easy to read and yes the new layout will get some getting used to but maybe well find something we lost or missed while exploring.

I'm really shocked by the negative attitude to the changes this site is a bonus and it's used at the pleasure of the owner(s) we should be thanking them for doing it and all the effort they put in

Thanks for everything and thanks for trying to move the site forward

Long live Brickset 2.0

Gravatar
By in United States,

I'd like to see a link at the bottom of "Sets By Year" after 2014, 2013, 2012, and 2011 that would send you to a page with every set by year.

Gravatar
By in United States,

Setting aside my purely aesthetic disgust for trendy web design fads, especially today's ipaddish ones, the dealbreaker problem is the difficulty of reading the white on blue on white, small sansserif font text for absolutely crucial info like set numbers. This is like "stealth information"; if you are TRYING to hide it from view, this is the font/color/size combo you would choose. It makes the gallery browse screens basically unusable because I have to squint to make out each individual set number.

Gravatar
By in United States,

There really does need to be that whole thing where you can see what's new at the Lego shop and what's new in the database. It's probably the best part of this site. I am honestly completely happy with the old design and would be fine if you kept it like that. But I can tell you've been working hard too...just please put the new images to view at the top of the homepage. It's like the "Welcome" sign of the page...

Gravatar
By in France,

The new look is great : more fluid and more consistent.
Continue this way !

Gravatar
By in Canada,

I...I don't know what to think. I also hate change in general, going with the "If it ain't broke, don't fix it" attitude. Some thoughts:

- I miss the blue background - to me seeing the blue on the old webpage told me instantly I was on Brickset.
- I think the top left should have the Brickset Logo bigger, with the title just to the right. Get it out of the box it's in.
- The new menu tabs along the top are easy to navigate which I like, however, I don't think they should be all different colors. It just looks too generic/simple. Makes me think of a children's website.
- In the "My Sets" area, I miss the small thumbnail for sets when browsing in Table view.
- The stories in the main feed on the home page should be separated from the white background. Maybe as per my first thought - keeping blue along the outside and having the feed in a box like the old page. I find it jumps out more that way. I feel the white just washes everything out.

Apologies if some of these have been brought up. I like that the site is moving forward, but maybe baby steps is better than a whole new layout.

Gravatar
By in United States,

I am one of those who have visited almost exclusively via mobile (an LG smartphone) over the past few months.

I liked the old design, which never gave me any trouble other than occasionally erratic scrolling while posting a comment. While writing this comment here (on the new version) that hasn't seemed to be a problem at all. So in terms of functionality, I'd give it the all clear.

As far as design, I like the new one a little better, and I appreciate the lack of brick clichés; it keeps the site looking classy.

As site redesigns go, this is the best rollout I've ever seen, in terms of maintaining the site's identity (despite the changes, it is clearly still brickset) and function while improving the appearance. Hats off to you, Huw!

P.s. my only gripe is that the forum is still hosted separately, but I'm over it :)

Gravatar
By in United States,

"I miss the 'new in the database/at shop.LEGO.com' on the home page"

:P

I was one of the people who said that. Yaay popular opinions.

As for the background (which I also complained about), how about adding a blue bar to the top (and maybe bottom as well)?

Gravatar
By in United States,

First off, wanted to say that it looks *really* good. You did one of the best jobs I've seen in modernizing a site while preserving it's soul. Thanks for all the hard work!

On one comment you made: "I'm going to provide a fourth view..."

Don't do it! Each view you offer adds cognitive load to your readers and complexity to maintain in the long run. I *strongly* suggest that you improve the existing views to better meet the needs that the "Classic" view used to offer. I like styling of the new views, they just seem a bit too large.

Keep up the great work - the beta is already really mature, you could have switched us all over cold turkey and we wouldn't have had any major hiccups!

Sincerely,
---tom

Gravatar
By in United Kingdom,

Ive just had a run through on my tablet and find the new format much easier to use than the old one. The problem with the tablet is missing what you aim for to change window, the new boxes are so much better. So I, m definatley up for change. Love the colours too.

Gravatar
By in United States,

If you think there is too much white space, just zoom out (Ctrl -) and it's about the same size as before.

Gravatar
By in Portugal,

my thoughts
- the new price comparator looks great
- the browsing sections looks much worse than the old one
- too much white, I agree with the others that like the blue background
- too less seperators/lines
- menus are too large, I'm working with 1440x900 pixels at the moment and I can't reach some of the menu-items at the bottom

Gravatar
By in United States,

On a desktop PC, I am finding that most of the site looks about right at about 90% zoom. I know that the goal is to increase legibility through larger fonts, but I think they went a little too far.

While the text on the site looks best at around 90% zoom, the galleries look best at around 75% zoom. I think that you went too far in increasing the size of images in the gallery - I would prefer to see more sets by adding a couple columns to that view - maybe 7 columns instead of 5 based on your max width.

I also wanted to share the feeling of many others that the new color scheme is nice and bright, a great refresh to the look and feel of the site!

Keep it up! I'm never going back to the old site - this one is already so much better and you aren't even finished yet!

Gravatar
By in Canada,

I for one also agree that the blue background should be kept, I don't like to much white because I feel like I'm on some store's website. I also just noticed the year arrows are back, not sure if they were added since I said that or I just missed them.

Gravatar
By in United States,

I really DON'T like the new website. I think it's hard to use. I really hope it doesn't change!

Gravatar
By in Canada,

I still can't log in - I don't know why.

Gravatar
By in United Kingdom,

Having had a good rant about the new site last night, I'm now a little torn. I like the changes in functionality (navigating round the database using the tags is very intuitive, and the changes to the 'buy it' listings - particularly being able to list all sources on one page - have already proved to be expensive ;) ), but I'm still struggling with the appearance - the white background is very harsh on my eyes, and the duplo sized menu and gallery are annoying after being used to the original, small, ones.

Two bug reports - at work today I was browsing the database in gallery format, and it was running really really slowly - slow enough that two copies of an image could appear as the screen was slowly redrawn (this was W7+IE8) - the other two formats worked at the speed I would expect. Also while browsing the database, the text for the options at the top of the page (e.g. 'select a subtheme', 'select a year') regularly overwrote any options already selected. (I know this isn't that clear, I will try and capture a screen shot next time I see it.)

Gravatar
By in United States,

I actually really like the new website! I agree with others that it would be really nice to have the option to customize the background color (or at least sidebars), if only with the options of all white or "Brickset Blue." For me, that option would really perfect the site.

For the most part, other than that, I think that it's a very nice update!

Gravatar
By in United States,

The following is a bug/feedback:
If I am looking at only the sets from a specific theme (ex: Star Wars), you don't need to show me the theme underneath the set name in the gallery view since every item in the gallery view is a Star Wars set.

That said, showing the theme underneath the name of each set is totally useful info and a useful hyperlink at looking at a more general view like all the sets in a specific year, or all the sets in my collection.

(Maybe the Gallery view should always show a piece of info that isn't already immediately visible. ex: show theme if the view isn't already a theme view, or show the year the set was released otherwise.)

I keep trying different scenarios on the site, and other than my feedback that everything is 10-25% too large on a PC screen, the site looks great!

---tom

Gravatar
By in United States,

The new site is fantastic. Clean. Modern. Readable. I prefer the bigger pics. Easier to pick things out at a glance.

Gravatar
By in United Kingdom,

Dear Huw,

I admire the way you're dealing with our many comments and varied opinions!

I haven't read any other comments about this (although I must admit I haven't read them all) but I really hope you would consider taking another look at the logo. I've submitted my remarks via the form but since you've not yet read those, I will repeat them here.

- The combination of a font with "fringes”, tight character spacing (character overlap even) AND the combined use of plain and bold characters makes the name look “messy” and decreases the readability. If the logo is supposed to represent Brickset, go for tidy and no-nonsense.

- There are 8 coloured blocks above the name. I'm not a fan of them but IF you want to keep them, I'd suggest to reduce the number to 6 (as there are 6 menu blocks), colour them accordingly and make them all the same size (currently the first and last one are smaller than the rest).

- Finally there’s the inclusion of the three 1-by-1s, a souvenir of the old site. I like that thought but I don’t think they fit the logo nor the new site design very well: they’re the only 3-dimensional elements on the site (everything else is flat) and the colours are just not fresh. Again, I like the inclusion of the 3 bricks but I would have reinterpreted them: probably a (more) 2D-version, different colours maybe.

- Regarding ^ and ^^: I would EITHER do the (redesigned) 3 1-by-1s-graphic (my preference!) OR the coloured blocks, not both.

Final note: unlike many changes that can be done as running changes even if the site has gone live, you don't change you're logo. So if you're willing to consider modifications, do it now! ;-)

Gravatar
By in United Kingdom,

^ Thanks for those thoughts on the logo. Originally it didn't have the bricks, they were added at my request to leave a link to the past. But you're right, they are perhaps out of place.

A lot of people have commented on the logo: maybe I should have a competition!

Gravatar
By in United Kingdom,

Huw, I'm not suggesting to remove the bricks. Like you, I very much like that link to the past! So keep the (reinterpreted) bricks, ditch the coloured blocks.

By the way, I forgot to mention that I like the logo's white characters on the blue background: this also hints to the old design in a subtle way.

IF you were to have a competition I'd definitely take part but I wouldn't advise you to do so. Unless you want to insult the designer of the current proposal and postpone the go-live date until 2016 ;-)

Gravatar
By in United States,

It's your site, and it's a great site, and you are the one who busted your ass to build it up, so you should do what you want with it, but i don't understand why you are dumping the lego-inspired look and feel. If you take out those three 1x1 plates, and blocked out the word LEGO from the subtitle, no one would ever guess what the site was about... just a bunch of generic colored boxes. Why is that good? Are you worried about TLG's lawyers for some reason? The overwhelming impression I get from the new design is, "generic." You could use exactly the same design for ActionFigureSet.com, SnowGlobeSet.com, and FrankinMintCommemorativePlateSet.com, and no one would be the wiser among the various fanbases of those things. Personally, I wouldn't see why that's desirable, but what do I know.

Gravatar
By in Portugal,

- Font is too Big - which for me is bad as it means more scrolling but overall is better for your eyes.
- Dislike white background - in older version the blue background enhanced the focus on the articles, making them distintic from one another.
- It is more cheerful and with more colours.
- I miss the old side bar but that's something I can live without :D
-

Gravatar
By in United Kingdom,

@Matthew, thanks, I've just written a second review on the new Brickset to test it out, it works great :D

Gravatar
By in United States,

For those having issues reading text on either the old or new site, try adjusting the zoom levels in your browser. The old site looks best bumped up 5 to 10% and the new site likes better bumped down 5 to 10% (at least with a 22 inch 1920x1080 resolution monitor.)

Apart from that, I too would miss the New at Shop.lego.com and New in the database feeds on the front page, the Random Set feature, and even the old Brickset logo, but a competition for a new one would be interesting!

Bottom line Huw - it's your website, and if you think making certain changes will help bring new fans in without alienating the old ones, I'm all for it.

Gravatar
By in Italy,

hello sorry for my English, I use the PC as a platform for and what I could see of nuivo site is very positive, I find it easy to colsultazione nicely divided into sections and not annoying to the eye, my vote is 10

Gravatar
By in United States,

I've given it a few days to adapt to the new website before commenting and have grown to like it.

Huw, I appreciate how much work this has taken so great job! My comments are the same as others have suggested.

1. Very white background is a little hard on the eyes. The font size I have adapted to but preferred the old size when I had the zoom function on my ipad. Now that I can't zoom the larger font is good. But I would really like to be able to zoom in on pictures etc in the future.

2. I really like the logo and think the 3 brick link to the old website is very appropriate especially as a lot of lego collecting is linked to the past.

3. Another fan of having the New in database/ new at lego shop stream at the top of the home page. I check this first up each time I visit the site.

4. The tabs at the top look fresh and great but I would love to see more of a lego feel to them. Whether the colours were not two greens and two blues but 4 different colours in keeping with brick colours with the red and orange and/or a shape design would give more identity? (Plus a link again to the history of the old site maybe?)

Gravatar
By in United States,

I understand the changes and reasons why, but there is a reason I visit Brickset over other Lego-based websites - it is clean. To clarify, I am not overwhelmed by various fonts, by the background color scheme, or a need to click through menus to view what I hope to see.

In the new site, for I know no matter what I write change is coming, stay with just sans serif fonts... please. I'm a teacher, and I have to read 15,000 pages of student writing a year. One reason I choose Brickset over other sites is due to the lack of serif fonts. Serif fonts, on computer screen are more difficult to read. Also, I am dyslexic, and the serifs help make reading challenging... they seem to help the letters switch places.

I've never been a fan of the black text of blue background at the end of the classic Brickset pages, but the white on the new site is just too much. Reminds me too much of the Lego.com page... which I actually limit my time at due to the "brightness" of the page.

Someone wrote that they were glad to see the brick-themed design elements, like studs on top of the tabs, go away. Not me! Maybe it is because I visit Brickset to read what is going on, instead of visiting to buy buy buy (which I've felt has been a focus shift within the forums and such in the past year or so), but I love all the cliche little brick images. Why? Because this is my hobby. This is my own personal joy. I like to see the studs show up in various places.

On a final note, use of this site is up, the site is recognizable now, and I just might visit less if it begins to feel more like other sites; and in a strange way, my first response to the new layout (faded with some visits) was this, why does the new layout look like mocpages? Not an attack on mocpages, just an identity crisis in my view.

Change is good, I guess, unless you are like me, and like a site for the reasons that originally draw a person in :/

Gravatar
By in Ireland,

How about infinite scroll for news on the homepage? Pagination is so last decade... ;-)

Gravatar
By in United Kingdom,

^ You can never reach the bottom of the page, where useful/interesting stuff is.

Gravatar
By in United States,

Tried to log in through the mobile site, but it kept saying log in.

Gravatar
By in United States,

I'd like to add my voice to the 'too much white background' camp, it tends to make the site harder to read.
Even any of the gray's used by the current site would work much better than the amount of white the current beta version has.

Overall it's looking much better than I expected, I expect that I can get used to it except the brightness) pretty easily.

Oh and please, oh please never put in infinite scrolling pages, such pages make me never wish to return to said site again.

Gravatar
By in Ireland,

^^^ That can move to the sidebar ;-)

Gravatar
By in United States,

Being new to this site I have nothing to compare with. That said, I like the layout and I am blown away by the"My Sets" page. I'm very impressed with the inventory listing of the 'owned' and 'wanted' items. The layout is fine on my Samsung 10.1 tablet. Keep up the good work!

Gravatar
By in United States,

I bet I'm going to get a lot of criticism for saying this, but IMO the old(pre-2009) news section was the best. It was condensed and there were no distractions. That's about the only thing I really like about the old Brickset; only in 2009 did I find this website intuitive. The new one is possibly even more simple and easy to use.

Gravatar
By in Germany,

I really like the new site, congrats! As a user with a 27" screen, I really like the larger design. Well done. Keep up the good work!

Gravatar
By in United States,

In bricklists, it says complied instead of compiled.

Gravatar
By in United Kingdom,

^ Well spotted, thanks

Gravatar
By in Japan,

Looks great on an iPad retina.
I don't like the font on my laptop, but it seems ok on the iPad.
Please add the forward/back arrows to the top of the page well as the bottom to facilitate browsing.
Thanks

Gravatar
By in United States,

I just noticed that the picture for the Collectible Minifigures "Waiter" (from Series 10, 71000-1) shows the picture for the complete set when you browse, but shows the correct picture when you click on it to zoom.

Gravatar
By in Ireland,

Just noticed a small navigation issue. I selected 'Browse 2013' so that gave me the list of sets from 2013 (http://new.brickset.com/sets/year-2013). Then I selected a theme, worked fine (http://new.brickset.com/sets/year-2013/theme-Creator). Then I wanted to see another theme. That means deleting the current theme filter, which reloads the page, and then selecting another theme. As I'm on a slow connection I used the browser back button, expecting to go back to just the 2013 selection (http://new.brickset.com/sets/year-2013) but it took me back to the page I was on before I browsed 2013.
All this in Chrome on Win7.
The 2013 and 2013+Creator lists each have their own url and the page reloads; it's not an ajax call. So it's odd that the back button skips a page in the history.
It would be handy to have an option to change the selected theme or year as well as the option to delete a filter. For the year you do get the links to the previous and next year at the bottom of the page but the option to just select another year from the list at the top would be nice.

Gravatar
By in United States,

Ack, just found FB and Twitter! Is Brickset going Corporate???

Gravatar
By in United States,

Another little thing I noticed, on the "How to Search Brickset" page, under "Manipulate the Page URL," it says, "The best way to learn now to..." rather than "how to." Nothing major, and the mobile site is very nice! Although, when you read comments, the font for authors, where they're from, etc. looks like it was typewritten, as in, written using a typewriter. I'm not sure if it looks that way on the desktop version or not. This was using Google Chrome on a Droid Razr.

Commenting has ended on this article.

Return to home page »