BDP9: Solomon's Temple

I'm surprised LEGO let this in - This is a ancient temple to an existing religion - first foremost and only, whereas Notre Dame is an architectural marvel that happens to be a church. These two things are not the same: It's a bit like saying Mega Bloks and LEGO are the same company, just because they're both brick-based toy makers, which is obviously wholly untrue. (also, the Jewish people might take offense at making copies of what was once their temple and selling them for a profit!)

I'm wondering if this will even make it to voting, honestly. No offense to modeltrainman - it's a nice MOC - but doesn't appear to fit the Lego brand IMO.

This has to be one of the most boring designs I've seen in a long time

Very cool build! I love the history and research behind this model!

@Huw said:
"Please, don't comment unless you have something positive to say."

I sincerely hope my comment wasn't considered negative - I labored long and hard on what I was trying to say without seeming rude. If it is, I'll gladly remove it - but I genuinely believe what I was trying to say is accurate.

odd

Made me realise that there are no churches or temples in Lego City, which is an excellent thing because children should play without minding religion differences.

Honestly I’ve wanted Biblical based Lego sets for a while, and architecture is a genius way to start. Amazing design!

@Murdoch17 said:
"I'm surprised LEGO let this in - This is a ancient temple to an existing religion - first foremost and only, whereas Notre Dame is an architectural marvel that happens to be a church. These two things are not the same: It's a bit like saying Mega Bloks and LEGO are the same company, just because they're both brick-based toy makers, which is obviously wholly untrue. (also, the Jewish people might take offense at making copies of what was once their temple and selling them for a profit!)

I'm wondering if this will even make it to voting, honestly. No offense to modeltrainman - it's a nice MOC - but doesn't appear to fit the Lego brand IMO."
I’m Jewish, and while I don’t represent all Jews, this set looks awesome and I will definitely buy…

I have been a huge history buff since childhood, so stuff like this is right up my alley.

I would love an entire series of sets of ancient buildings, temple or otherwise. There are so many interesting and varied designs with fascinating history.

@Huw said:
"Please, don't comment unless you have something positive to say."

So we aren't allowed to even point out if the MOC is inaccurate or simply not that well made?

@Huw said:
"Please, don't comment unless you have something positive to say."

I feel comments on LEGO models have no need to be incendiary or cruel in order to express negativity or disinterest, but what is the purpose of a public forum that asks for only one mode of opinions? There's a difference between being critical and being a jerk about it, and the former should be allowed.

@Huw said:
"Please, don't comment unless you have something positive to say."

That's a bit weird, and I hope that's not how you conduct your official reviews for sets Lego sends. There's a difference between asking for constructive criticism instead of generic negative feedback and asking to only praise a set.

@legomanijak said:
" @Huw said:
"Please, don't comment unless you have something positive to say."

So we aren't allowed to even point out if the MOC is inaccurate or simply not that well made?"
I don't think @Huw meant to discourage constructive criticism, just plain negativity.

@Murdoch17 said:
"I'm surprised LEGO let this in - This is a ancient temple to an existing religion - first foremost and only, whereas Notre Dame is an architectural marvel that happens to be a church. These two things are not the same: It's a bit like saying Mega Bloks and LEGO are the same company, just because they're both brick-based toy makers, which is obviously wholly untrue. (also, the Jewish people might take offense at making copies of what was once their temple and selling them for a profit!)

I'm wondering if this will even make it to voting, honestly. No offense to modeltrainman - it's a nice MOC - but doesn't appear to fit the Lego brand IMO."

I also don't understand your statement. Why would Notre Dame be more of an architectural marvel than this temple? I'd argue that recreating ancient sites that are no longer preserved is less 'controversial' than LEGOfying existing buildings with a religious connotation. (Mind, I'm not even averse to religious architecture in LEGO form.)

Id like to suggest some refinements that would improve it (YMMV) as it does look very "MOC" at the moment:

Shift the stairs back by a plates height to hide those connections at the top.
Realign the tiles to make a consistent chequered pattern.
Close the gaps in the temple façade with the bottom of brackets like 79389.
Reduce the height of the bath substantially - it's taller than the walls.
Also with the bath, get the bricks upright and cap it with tiles, inverted curved bricks looks very rough.
Rearrange some of the wall components so that you don't have 4 brick high vertical joints.
Is there a reason for a 2-wide DBG tile at the base of the steps when the remainder are 1-wide?
There's a 6x6 black plate under the front right tower?

"King Solomon, these men need you to settle a dispute. They each claim ownership of this Lego set."
"The set shall be cut in two! And each man shall receive... death. I'll build the Lego set."

I really like the main temple build, it has some nice details. That said, I do have my doubts about the wall surrounding it on all sides. I mean, it makes it kinda impractical to display it, and the front wall just doesn't look so great. And then all those 1x1 tiles.....nice effect but a chore to build. And it also adds a lot to the piece count and as a result the price. While I can appreciate including the whole thing, I'd say it would make for a better set if the focus was just been on the main part.
(I hope I'm not being too negative now?)