Random set of the day: Adventurer - Johnny Thunder
Posted by Huwbot,
Today's random set is 5900 Adventurer - Johnny Thunder, released during 1998. It's one of 21 Adventurers sets produced that year. It contains 13 pieces and 1 minifig, and its retail price was US$4.25.
It's owned by 1,513 Brickset members. If you want to add it to your collection you might find it for sale at BrickLink or eBay.
119 likes
54 comments on this article
The Legend!
My boy!
I forgot that printed dynamite tile existed.
@KoolKreeper489 said:
"The Legend!"
The one and only Johnny Thunder! Move over Indiana Jones; you're old hat. ;-)
Classic Figure. Easily in the top 10 greatest original lego characters
That scorpion just chucked dynamite at Johnny Thunder! How rude!!
I miss that backpack element. And that "Lego System" logo.
Well, that is quite the adventure. Do you deal with the scorpion first, or the dynamite that you accidentally lit by holding your magnifying glass so it focused sunlight on the fuse?
@PurpleDave said:
"Well, that is quite the adventure. Do you deal with the scorpion first, or the dynamite that you accidentally lit by holding your magnifying glass so it focused sunlight on the fuse?"
Answer: chuck lit dynamite at scorpion and hopefully don't miss!
AKA Joe Freeman AKA Sam Grant.
Nephew to Dr. Kilroy, AKA Dr. Lightning, AKA Dr. Articus, Brother to Dr. Cyber from Time Cruisers.
Married to Miss Pippin Reed, AKA Gail Storm, AKA Linda Lovelay.
Best friend of Pilot Harry Cane, AKA Billy Speed.
Arch Nemesis of Sam Sanister AKA Baron von Barron AKA Mr. Hates.
Check out that audio drama from 5938 !
EDIT:
Spiritual successor of both Capt'n Roger (Red Beard) and Cerlin (Majisto/Filikrato VI), blatant Indiana Jones knock-off and champion of the 4th track in Lego Racers 1.
BTW, look up 'film hinge' that's nice science stuff, and what's that backpack basically is^^
On the back of the box you see the prototypes for both the crate/box and the scorpion, in the retail version their stud types were switched!
Is the magnifying glass basically one of the first parts with color code 30 - Mult. 1?
@KoolKreeper489 said:
"The Legend!"
The Man. The Myth.
I love you, Johnny!
@Atuin said:
"champion of the 4th track in Lego Racers 1."
Too much... nostalgia... must not curl into a ball and think about my age...
@Murdoch17:
He’s close enough to set it on the scorpion, if he dares. That’s not really going to solve the dynamite issue, though.
@Atuin:
Film hinge? Must be a German thing. In the English-speaking world, these are referred to as living hinges, and far more commonly not referred to at all, because people don’t realize they even have a name. Like aglets. Whose true purpose is sinister.
Greatest LEGO character of all time. I think we are long overdue for a fifth wave
-Egypt
-Amazon
-Dinosaurs
-Orient Expedition
-??
What's with the green piece?
Beware the 2D bomb.
Johnny Thunder was the best character Lego ever made. He has outlived all the others in the minds and hearts of Lego fans. He is not an Indiana Jones rip off, he is his own man.
I do wish Lego came up with unique themes like this still. They are trying to add named characters to Lego City (as if anyone remembers them after 5 minutes let alone 5 years) but it's just not the same. Chase McCain was alright but he was just a Lego police guy with a name.
Johnny Thunder on the other hand is a legend. He is so much more then a piece of yellow plastic with a slouch hat (Aussie Aussie Aussie!), he has almost evolved into a real person, along with his somewhat equally famous and legendary Dr Kilroy and Pippin Reed.
What's not to love about Adventurers? Lovely vintage vehicles and aircraft, lots of cool, unique, interesting 3D characters, unique locations with lots of interesting pieces.
Pharaohs Quest was an okay attempt at a rehash but 1. I don't know why on earth they didn't just do an updated Johnny Thunder, and 2. the theme didn't have the same story as Adventurers. It was basically just some old cars in the desert and people fighting desert creatures. There was no 'hook' to it, it didn't even have any antagonists (I would separate the creatures and mummies to human antagonists like Baron Von Barron).
In saying that, it wasn't that bad and again I don't know why Lego didn't then just make more themes based around the new hero of Jake Raines.
@gylman:
Aliens!
@leetshoe:
It’s the island. It’s surprisingly lush, but the beach scene is fairly lacking.
@Brickchap:
Ninjago has far outlived Johnny Thunder at retail.
Judging by that green plate, this set looks like it was trying to be a jungle set but ended up stranded in the desert... maybe yet another casualty of Professor Voltage's time machine incident?
@PurpleDave. No one was attacking Ninjago, not sure what your point is? Lego cancelled poor Johnny but kept going with Ninjago. That doesn't mean Adventurers was a bad theme or shouldn't return.
I would also argue that while the first few seasons were well developed, Ninjago now has pretty much turned into Lego City where it is an evergreen theme lots of people love, but its lost its direction. Some of the subthemes are a tad odd and it would be cooler seeing them as apart of a whole new idea rather than basically putting any new location, time period etc. under the banner of Ninjago.
Maybe I'm wrong, but I also feel that people were a lot more connected to the Ninjago story and characters in the past then they are now.
Those were the times. I'm happy I got my share of Johnny Thunder.
@Brickchap:
You said, “He has outlived all the others in the minds and hearts of Lego fans.” Objectively, this is true because he’s really the first character to be identified on the set boxes. Everyone before him was just a nameless smiley. All he has to do to maintain that claim is not be forgotten. However, just the first year of Bionicle probably outsold the entire run of Adventurers, and the kids who were buying them haven’t really transitioned to System themes, so they probably don’t care about Adventurers. Ninjago has outlasted even Bionicle (and possibly outsold it at this point), and the kids who grew up on that probably don’t care about Adventurers or Bionicle. Kids who watched The LEGO Movie could probably name at least a dozen original characters from the film before Johnny’s name comes to mind. Adventurers didn’t fare that well in the 90th Anniversary vote, from what I recall, but people who grew up on it assume everyone who came after holds it in the same high regard. I mean, I don’t, but I spent three years neck deep in the Bionicle phenomenon, so even if I didn’t care about Tahu more than Johnny to begin with, I would have received a hefty dose of reality by the time I moved on.
Besides, objectively, based on the sheer number of different versions they’ve produced, Batman is the most popular character they’ve brought into the lineup, in large part because he’s _not_ an original character.
@PurpleDave , Johnny Thunder was far from the first named character. Majisto and Captain Roger Redbeard come to mind. But Adventurers was far more clearly story-driven than what came before. And most importantly, it was more clearly focussed on a main character than ever before.
Yes, stuff from later came later, themes that ran for a decade or longer ran for longer than Adventurers. The floor is made out of floor.
But Johnny Thunder as a character has seemingly stuck with people from that era the most.
Maybe this is quality over quantity. I doubt more people care about the Lego version of Batman all that much. And those sales numbers only tell you so much, you know?
And that quality can be subjective. Perhaps people look fondly on Johnny Thunder because of the relatively high chance of owning the figure if you only have a couple of the small sets. Perhaps because of the marketing. And perhaps this fondness is a regional thing only, probably more common in the US. Personally I grew up in this era and the name didn't stick with me as much as it evidently did with other people. But the point is that as a singular character he would be remembered well.
And that's the neat thing here. People are nostalgic and get joy out of it! It's nice to see!
That's why I personally love the RSotD.
As an aside, this particular set always confused me. What are you supposee to build here, with this loose bunch of acessories a crate and a plate? And I mean build, not put in a crate. And why did they put a green plate in a desert-focussed theme anyway? Is this an oasis?
Out of all the sets featuring Johnny Thunder, this is not exactly the best, even of its size class. Unless you just want those then-new accesories and nothing else but the Legend himself.
@PurpleDave Well firstly I was just making a happy, positive comment. I do hate it these days that every single word has to be analysed and debated, challenged or cancelled. My comment wasn't a proposition for a new legal code in the U.N Charter that Johnny Thunder is the most popular Lego character of all time so I don't see why you needed to challenge it.
Also, I wasn't even alive when many of the Adventurers sets were around yet I am an ardent fan. I rather doubt anyone can be a proper FOL (like real into Lego) without at least hearing about this chap Johnny Thunder.
Bionicle is popular, true, but how many times do you see anyone on the internet (not just Brickset but in general) ever mention any of the Bionicle characters names, especially compared to the amount of times Johnny Thunder is mentioned? In fact it apart from the Lego Ideas project and the 90th anniversary vote, I haven't really heard the word Bionicle mentioned since I was in primary school and the sets were on shelves.
I would also strongly rebut your argument about 1st year Bionicle outselling Adventurers. You are probably correct about sets being sold, but I would question that as proof of a theme's enduring popularity. I give you some examples. Van Gogh sold I think it was about 3 artworks in his whole lifetime. Yet he is one of the most revered and famous artists. Unlike Van Gogh, Adventurers was actually really popular during the time it was on shelves, and after. Another example; not many kids thesedays would have the Beatles on their spotify playlist, but that doesn't mean the Beatles don't have an enduring popularity.
Again no one was questioning the popularity of Ninjago. But I do think characters like Johnny Thunder and Captain Redbeard are more enduring then Kai for example. Predominantly because they were developed more rather than just being a name.
As for the Lego Movie, you are in part true but really, how many times have we heard Emmet used apart from The Lego Movies? From what I've seen Emmet and his friends didn't pick up that much with kids (like most protagonists of modern films, kids love them when the film is out but forget them the moment there's a new film). Personally I wouldn't say Emmet was very unique, his character personality has been done many times before.
I'm reading a book on Scotland at the moment and I've heard many times of Robert the Bruce, Mary Queen of Scots, William Wallace, these people were around in like the 13th century and in fact often didn't do as much as history would suggest yet they are enduring. I'm an Australian in the 21st century and I was equally accustomed to those names as I am of Scott Morrison or Joe Biden. Sure, historical figures (in Scotland) have surpassed these people, yet they endure far longer than say James II or whoever is the leader of Scotland right now.
You are correct that Adventurers didn't go as well in the 90th anniversary, but that was for the whole theme rather than Johnny himself. More importantly, Adventurers was up against Castle, Pirates and Classic Space, which as well as having the nostalgia factor are also more broad. I think Adventurers didnt fare as well simply because it wasn't as clear what 1 set for the entire Adventurers theme (s) should be. Like Castle theme...duhh a big castle. Pirates? A pirate ship, maybe with a fort. Space? A big space ship or space base. Adventurers? Probably an Egyptian temple with some vehicles. But that doesn't mean Adventurers is less popular. You should also recall just how many options on that vote were just subthemes of The Big Three (Castle, Pirates, Space) so of course they outweighed everything else.
As the lit dynamite hit ground, Johnny had two thought ran through his mind near-simultaneously:
-"It's gonna be another one of THOSE days..."
(and)
-"I miss my cart..."
Adventure was within my 'Dark Period', so I remember seeing and thinking: "So "Indiana Jones', if he were done by Lego."...why can't I have that level of 'vision' with Stocks or the Lotto...:)
@gylman said:
"Greatest LEGO character of all time. I think we are long overdue for a fifth wave
-Egypt
-Amazon
-Dinosaurs
-Orient Expedition
-??"
Antarctica?
Maybe we'll finally have Lego Shoggoths!
@Aramor I actually thought that. A Shackleton type expedition would be cool especially combined with that 1939 Antarctic Explorer vehicle that was massive and carried an aeroplane on it (it was too heavy for the ice and was abandoned).
Ah the man himself. But I do wonder why he packed a scorpion in amongst the other weapons in his gun crate, perhaps he intends to throw it at someone?
@Brickalili said:
"Ah the man himself. But I do wonder why he packed a scorpion in amongst the other weapons in his gun crate, perhaps he intends to throw it at someone?"
It's his pet scorpion. Voyages through the desert can get lonely.
@gylman said:
"Greatest LEGO character of all time. I think we are long overdue for a fifth wave
-Egypt
-Amazon
-Dinosaurs
-Orient Expedition
-??"
Middle East or southeast Asia.
@jkb They did Orient Expedition before which covered Nepal, India and China. South East Asia is a good idea but I feel like that would be too similar to Orient Expedition.
Middle East would be way too similar to Egypt. As in, archaeological digs in Mesopotamia, Persia etc, although of course very different cultures would still be very similar sets to the Egypt line.
They could do places like Indonesia, New Guinea, what about the Pacific Islands or even Johnny's homeland (and mine too) Australia? I reckon some Pacific Islands or looking for sunken treasure would work best.
When I see that dynamite I hear the fuse from Booty.
You can just see Johnny looking at the dynamite, wondering who dropped their dynamite picture in the middle of a desert.
I think I must be the wrong generation to appreciate this. The idea is sound but the execution of the print for the head... oh dear. Not for me.
This set as a very action figure with accessories energy, not that that's a bad thing.
@Brickchap said:
" @jkb They did Orient Expedition before which covered Nepal, India and China. South East Asia is a good idea but I feel like that would be too similar to Orient Expedition.
Middle East would be way too similar to Egypt. As in, archaeological digs in Mesopotamia, Persia etc, although of course very different cultures would still be very similar sets to the Egypt line.
They could do places like Indonesia, New Guinea, what about the Pacific Islands or even Johnny's homeland (and mine too) Australia? I reckon some Pacific Islands or looking for sunken treasure would work best. "
I like your choice of pacific areas, but I must object to your objections.
The Middle East of the past and even more of today is very different to Egypt.
Also, I don't think South East Asia (Which imo includes indonesia and the Phillipines) is similar to India/Nepal/China.
When you measure by thatrange of similarity, you couldn't ever do any other archeological themes that take place in the jungle (Africa - the archeological sites there are still criminally neglected by pop science - /Americas/Asia), in the desert (Africa/Asia/Australia/Americas) or anywhere in the cold. Would leave Europe which isn't very exotic from Johnny's point of view.
Anyway, I wonder how, or rather, IF LEGO could pull off another Adventurers subtheme without being accused of promoting colonialism and racism. And as annoying as SJWs can occasionally become, here they'd have a legitimate point!
There’s a lot of love for Adventurers here so in case some people didn’t know, the current haunted house set has a lot of references to the theme.
Also, Linda Lovelay is quite the name
@jkb, yes African archaeology would be interesting. How on earth does Adventurers support colonialism though?? Or racism??
They are just Indy style explorers they aren't conquering anything nor do they steal anything. Plus they have lots of friends from the various areas they go and certainly never said or did anything racist.
There are good guys and bad guys from each area. Like Sam Sinister is a bad Englishmen, Von Barron a bad German, Dr Kilroy is a good Englishman, Johnny a good Aussie. (I think Pippin was American?) They had Baboo the good Indian, and whatever the Maharaja chap was the bad guy. I forget their Chinese friend's name I can remember what the character looked like but not the name. Then there was the evil Emperor. Plus they were often fighting 'neutral' monsters and so forth.
I do think Europe would be an interesting one to do like Eastern Europe (maybe an evil Russian), or Greece, maybe Scandinavia with some Norse elements?
Johnny Thunder is pretty awesome.
But I have to agree with PurpleDave. Most of the Thunder sets I obtained I was able to get at significant discount. He was around when LEGO was only a fraction of its current size, and he certainly didn’t sell that well.
Much like my own beloved SPACE, we just have to realize that what we love and find appealing about LEGO doesn’t always translate to the mass market. LEGO has lots of original themes, but out of them all, it is Ninjago that has truly reached that rarefied air of being universally popular, the way Transformers and GI Joe were in the mid 80s.
Same as 1094, so interesting to compare with the RSOD comments from May 2020.
@Brickchap and @PurpleDave : both Adventurers and Bionicle happened during my dark ages, but even I know Johnny Thunder. I think I even have one lying around somewhere from some joblot I bought on ebay years ago.
I don't know any Bionicle characters though. Go figure.
And while I have quite a lot of Ninjago sets, I still don't know which character is which (nor do I care, to be honest. I was never interested in named characters, I made up my own names and stories anyway as a kid. And as an adult I am only interested in the building experience, the minifigs are just window dressing - or go straight to the parts bin if they don't look interesting enough to me).
@Brickchap I had a long answer written for you, but it didn't reach Brickset =/
In Short: Johnny Thunder is set in the late era of colonialism, where white "civilized" people showed "savages" how to do things right. They took away their land and what they found on it (cultural artefacts, ressources) believing in doing so was righteous.
Don't get me wrong here, I love the Indy movies, but I can't watch any time pieces from that era without remiding me of these facts. So, the colonial era may be iconic and have a romantic side to it, but it's not without its problems. A re-roll of Adventurers would have to appeal to kids worldwide while at the same time teaching the facts. In multiple languages. Good luck with that, marketing people.
As for the racism accusation: Even though these old Minifigs' looks are based on real aspects of the respective cultures, some people will say that they're stereotypes - and therefore, racist. It's not the same, but try to tell people.
As for eastern and northern Europe: There are archeological sites here, but Europe is crowded and you don't get the romantic remoteness of "new territories".
I didn't see the point of buying this set at the time, when I already had three identical Johnny Thunders from 5938, 5956 and 5919. In hindsight I wonder if I maybe regret that a little, just because this was THE signature set of one of my childhood favourite characters... would have been nice to keep around, especially complete with its box and all. Nostalgic.
Even though I've never been a fan of the name Johnny, he somehow makes it work?
-
Regarding the comments about the ethical questions surrounding the Adventurers, in the UK Adventures magazine comics at least they were explicitly stated to be investigating the sites with the intention of studying and documenting the treasures and then putting them back where they found them. Orient Expedition had them actually taking the treasure away; but in that case the backstory in the online comic explained that the Golden Dragon and the treasures that led to it actually belonged to historical explorer Marco Polo, received as gifts from the Khan of China as repayment for services Polo had performed for him. He had left the map so that future explorers could retrieve them on his behalf after his death... making it so that, again, they weren't technically stealing.
Of course, such details aren't necessarily clear from the sets themselves. Inevitably if the sets are on toy store shelves, a lot of people are going to see them without the context of - or even any knowledge that there is - a backstory that gives the characters noble intentions, and draw their own conclusions based solely on what the box-art presents them with.
@Brickchap said:
"or Greece"
Johnny Thunder and co. have in fact visited Greece! It wasn't an actual line of sets, though; only an online flash story/game that took place in the interim between Dino Island and Orient Expedition. I don't remember what they were specifically looking for... the only parts that stand out in my memory are that Sam Sinister (that is, Baron Von Barron) had a jetpack in one scene, and that the final 'showdown' of the game was Johnny... playing Connect Four against the minotaur.
So yeah. That was a thing!
Cool character of course but that price! With inflation that's over 7$ in today's money!!
Adventurers is by far my favorite and most nostalgic theme as a kid. I would be 100% on board for a Johnny Thunder reboot.
@ThatBionicleGuy said:
" @Brickchap said:
"or Greece"
Johnny Thunder and co. have in fact visited Greece! It wasn't an actual line of sets, though; only an online flash story/game that took place in the interim between Dino Island and Orient Expedition. I don't remember what they were specifically looking for... the only parts that stand out in my memory are that Sam Sinister (that is, Baron Von Barron) had a jetpack in one scene, and that the final 'showdown' of the game was Johnny... playing Connect Four against the minotaur.
So yeah. That was a thing!"
I remember that! It was one of the golden statues, in this case a bull. Here's a playthrough: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eKBnNOMsqMU
This is the last recorded image of Johnny Thunder, who was hauling a box of adventuring gear through the desert when a wayward scorpion caused him to forget about a stick of dynamite he had just lit for warmth. The sands of the desert do, in fact, grow cold every night. Johnny left behind five children and an irritable scarlet macaw with a gamer's vocabulary.
The name of this set alone inclines me to love it: my younger brothers have accused me--accurately--of having made Johnny Thunder the protagonist of my entire LEGO universe. So I'm sympathetic to and wish to enjoin solemnly all hyperbole in his and the Adventurers' favour.
While I would absolutely eat a new Adventurers theme up, especially if it really were the Adventurers (Johnny Thunder, Harry Cane, Gail Storm, and Dr. Lightning--if I may take the Canadian side in the name wars) in a new environment, I don't really need that: part of what made the theme great to me in the first place was that the adventurers could easily "go on the road"--to Castle, Pirates, even Space, or--dare I say it--Ninjago.
But it would be nice to see the whole team again.
@Brickchap said:
"I'm reading a book on Scotland at the moment and I've heard many times of Robert the Bruce, Mary Queen of Scots, William Wallace, these people were around in like the 13th century and in fact often didn't do as much as history would suggest yet they are enduring. I'm an Australian in the 21st century and I was equally accustomed to those names as I am of Scott Morrison or Joe Biden. Sure, historical figures (in Scotland) have surpassed these people, yet they endure far longer than say James II or whoever is the leader of Scotland right now."
I’m not getting drawn on achievements vs persistence of recognition, but the pedant in me feels compelled to point out that Mary Queen of Scots was 16th century, not 13th, and the titular current ‘leader of Scotland’ is Queen Elizabeth II though the de facto ‘leaders’ are Alexander Boris Johnson as UK Prime Minister and Nicola Sturgeon as Scotland’s First Minister.
I used this guy's torso and hat and Solo's head to make my own Indiana Jones before Lego made him officially
@Binnekamp:
What I remember is that Majisto and Redbeard were names that appeared in set names, and that it wasn’t hard to figure out who they referred to. But they were the exceptions in a sea of anonymous minifigs. Adventurers, unless I’m completely misremembering, identified the entire cast right on the box. If that’s not the case, I may have only been aware of them due to receiving the Club magazine for the first time in my life during Orient Expedition. During my childhood, I had no Club magazine, the internet didn’t exist in any meaningful way, and the catalogs were pack-ins that didn’t offer much in the way of character background.
@Brickchap:
The Bionicle community is still thriving, in spite of being cut off from a regular parts supply. There’s just not a lot of crossover with the general AFOL community, and with good reason. There are three members of my LUG who grew up on Bionicle, and they all knew who I was when they joined, but the oldest of them was three when I started Mask of Destiny, and probably hadn’t even started reading the site when I left in 2004. The youngest wasn’t even born yet when the first Bionicle sets came out. They, and probably you, are all too young to really remember how toxic the AFOL community was towards Bionicle. It didn’t help that the main hub of AFOLdom at the time was LUGNET. It was geared towards 18+, and was used by people who grew up on System and brick-Technic, and they tended to be pretty abusive to anyone who posted something favorable about Bionicle there. It didn’t take long for Bionicle-exclusive communities to pop up, and the majority of fans don’t really pay attention to anything outside of their sphere of fandom. There are _maybe_ a dozen of us here who are fans of both Bionicle and System/Technic.
As for developed characters, remember that Bionicle had at least three home video releases, a comic book, a line of regular books, and several games that all developed the characters. Ninjago has had a TV series running alongside it for pretty much the entire run of the theme (pay no attention to the feature film behind the curtain). In terms of developed story for an original theme, those are the top two. Hero Factory, Friends, and Elves probably round out the top five.
I do still see kids spot Emmet a couple times a year in my LUG’s layouts (to be fair, it’s often some random construction worker), so he’s not forgotten. I don’t remember any kids spotting Johnny Thunder, but I don’t know if we have any minifigs out that could be mistaken for him. For sure, orange is easier to pick out than tan.
And Queen Elizabeth II is the leader of Scotland! Head of State, at least, but not Head of Government.
Regarding the 90th vote, remember that when they rejiggered the results to kick Bionicle out of the top spot, it didn’t get knocked out of the top three. Didn’t it end up second?
@Zander yes you are absolutely correct about Mary Queen of Scots. In my defence, the book covers like 3 centuries in each chapter and it was difficult to tell at times which century the author was talking about.
Yes, technically Queen Elizabeth II is the leader of Scotland, but I've never heard of Nicola Sturgeon. I'm sure she's done good things, but wont be remembered like those of the past.
Hence I rest my case about Johnny, which as I said to the first response was never meant to start a debate I was just writing a nice comment about a cool theme and as usual people had to make a mountain out of a molehill.
@jkb. Thank you for explaining your point. I am well aware of the history of colonialism, in fact I've read quite a lot of books on it and I still fail to see how Adventurers is colonialist.
Your argument is pretty much that "its the 1920s/1930s and the main characters are (supposedly) white - therefore it's colonialist" That makes no sense. Do Lego sets made in 2022 support the Russian invasion of Ukraine simply because they are made and set in the year 2022?
With that logic Pirates would therefore be supporting the slave trade because it was happening around the same time, despite the fact that Pirates (and Lego) clearly do NOT support the slave trade, nor does Adventurers support colonialism. Hell, the bad guys are the English so you can hardly say its supporting the British Empire, and none of the other European powers are present (not that it should matter)
@BrickChap My argument wasn't as much the time frame of colonialism, but what the Adventurers were modeled after. but yes, if you dig deep enough, you find crimes and cruelty in Pirates, Castle... pretty much any period of human history.
Colonialism, however, is pretty intense, as white people walked over the earth as if they owned it.
You have to agree that this can couse trouble as values to day have shifted or are shifting and context and explanation are key against shitstorms.
Speaking of explanation: In Germany you basically got background info (and minifigs' names) from the catalogs. And it was sparse.
All that said, I'd pretty much like to see more historical stuff. Why not a dedicated theme? Every wave would focus on a different time in different parts of the world (as many countries monstly teach their own and local hinstory) - this could be accompanied by a non-mandatory app that teaches kids about the stuff in their respective lanuage. That way, even a LEGO app would become useful! Similar to that cartoon, "One upon a time... man" in LEGO form, but updated!
@Brickchap:
Regarding the “colonialism”, one of my college friends got a Masters in archaeology and a PhD in anthropology. When Stargate (the movie, not the TV show) came out, he was excited that there was going to be a movie that featured an archaeologist as a main character. I mean, how could I not point out Indiana Jones. Turns out, he loves the movies, but hates the archaeology. Pretty much his entire profession hates the image it presents. Johnny Thunder is straight up cribbed from Indiana Jones. It’s a large part of why the character was as successful as it was, at a time when licensed LEGO themes were not yet a thing (one year before they launched the Star Wars theme). But Indiana Jones himself is arguably a heavily glamorized version of the likes of Heinrich Schliemann. Both would charge into a historical site, wreck the place, and cart off just the treasure. Schliemann is credited with a lot of discoveries because he excavated with speed and moved on to the next target, but he destroyed the things modern archaeologists most value, and with it any historical record for all the treasures he carted back to Europe. Given that the locals in Adventurers are basically just guides, while the “archaeologists” are from English-speaking nations, it’s hard to dispel the image of Schliemann, who only got away with what he did because European powers had colonized every nation he excavated.
In Indy’s defense, in all four movies he managed to basically save the world. And he did give the Sankara stones back to the village.