Random set of the day: Airport

Posted by ,
Airport

Airport

©2010 LEGO Group

Today's random set is 3182 Airport, released during 2010. It's one of 37 City sets produced that year. It contains 703 pieces and 5 minifigs, and its retail price was US$99.99/£81.99.

It's owned by 6,353 Brickset members. If you want to add it to your collection you might find it for sale at BrickLink or eBay.


32 comments on this article

Gravatar
By in United States,

How is this airport still in operation? This is less than a skeleton crew, there's only two people to work the whole airport, and the pilot and flight attendant only have one passenger for a massive jet. Times were more than hard in 2010 for LEGO City...

Gravatar
By in United States,

OSHA required this airport to meet a ladder quota, this was the bitter response.

Gravatar
By in Australia,

Alongside the 2006 one, this is probably LEGO's best airport. I never owned it, but a childhood friend did.

Gravatar
By in United States,

Great set. Ended up having to give the plane away though...I may or may not regret that decision...

Gravatar
By in United States,

@MCLegoboy said:
"How is this airport still in operation? This is less than a skeleton crew, there's only two people to work the whole airport, and the pilot and flight attendant only have one passenger for a massive jet. Times were more than hard in 2010 for LEGO City..."

There is nobody in the flight control tower. This could be a problem on a level not seen since Airplane! films of the 80's. I can hear it now:
Announcer on LEGO City Airport intercom: "Umm, this may be unrelated, but does anybody know how to land a plane... or a few planes?" *panic ensues in the terminal*

Gravatar
By in United States,

What a very straightforward set name.

Gravatar
By in Australia,

Maybe it's just me, but it feels like Lego has really struggled with City airports, for the better part of the 00s.

This one is, okay, I guess, but it seems like the front door to the building is also the exit to go and find your plane. I mean, that's just a security nightmare, right there.

Also, who has the room in their collection for these gigantic oversized planes? I get that they're more to scale, compared to minifigs, but the smaller ones actually fit into my city (and the cupboard where I store most of my collection) a lot better.

Gravatar
By in United States,

@MCLegoboy said:
"How is this airport still in operation? This is less than a skeleton crew, there's only two people to work the whole airport, and the pilot and flight attendant only have one passenger for a massive jet. Times were more than hard in 2010 for LEGO City..."

That explains why flights are always delayed.

Gravatar
By in United Kingdom,

I think this was the last nice Airport.
The others since then have been a little lacklustre.

Gravatar
By in Spain,

@RaiderOfTheLostBrick said:
"Alongside the 2006 one, this is probably LEGO's best airport. I never owned it, but a childhood friend did."

I can recall that as an under 10 years child I was in absolute love with 6392... Still am.

'O tempora, o mores'

Gravatar
By in Sweden,

The plane itself looks great. I wonder if it was as nice when you had it in hand. There's also the "issue" of it using huge molded pieces, but a brick plane wouldn't look as slick I'd say.

Gravatar
By in United States,

@Murdoch17 said:
" @MCLegoboy said:
"How is this airport still in operation? This is less than a skeleton crew, there's only two people to work the whole airport, and the pilot and flight attendant only have one passenger for a massive jet. Times were more than hard in 2010 for LEGO City..."

There is nobody in the flight control tower. This could be a problem on a level not seen since Airplane! films of the 80's. I can hear it now:
Announcer on LEGO City Airport intercom: "Umm, this may be unrelated, but does anybody know how to land a plane... or a few planes?" *panic ensues in the terminal*"


"Looks like I picked the wrong week to quit smoking..."

Gravatar
By in Ireland,

This set really suffered from the lack of baseplates. An airport needs a runway.

Gravatar
By in United States,

The price per part and price per pound of the $100 City airport terminal + wide-body airliner sets aren’t great, but the price per playability is superb. I’ve got the 2020 equivalent of this set (60262) and I love it.

Gravatar
By in United States,

@iwybs said:
"The price per part and price per pound of the $100 City airport terminal + wide-body airliner sets aren’t great, but the price per playability is superb. I’ve got the 2020 equivalent of this set (60262) and I love it."

ooo I got the 2016 version!

Gravatar
By in United States,

@LeonHardJPG said:
" @RaiderOfTheLostBrick said:
"Alongside the 2006 one, this is probably LEGO's best airport. I never owned it, but a childhood friend did."

I can recall that as an under 10 years child I was in absolute love with 6392... Still am."


6392 was nice, but for me, 10159 was the high water mark of Lego airports. After Lego duploized the city aircraft, I lost all interest in Lego aircraft/airports...too many specialized pieces. It didn't feel like Lego anymore.

Gravatar
By in United States,

@sir_vasco:
I’m sure they meant to get access to the second floor, not as a cornice.

Gravatar
By in Canada,

@Murdoch17 and @oldfan:
Steve McCroskey: "How about some coffee Johnny?"
Air Traffic Controller Johnny Henshaw-Jacobs: "No thanks..."
or better/more ironic:
Reporter: "What kind of plane is it?"
Johnny: "Oh, it's a big pretty white plane with red stripes, curtains in the windows and wheels and it looks like a big Tylenol."
Loved those movies. Yes...even the second one was fun.:)

As to the 'set', closest I ever got was the 'Juniors' airport, with a couple of smaller planes: 6313019 s to be correct. Good idea, just needs augmenting/retooling.:)

Gravatar
By in Netherlands,

I have a strong dislike for airplanes in this style. I don't care if they are more to scale, I find them way too big and those huge parts are atrocious. I'd choose those small 4-studs-wide airplanes of yore over these planes anyday.

Gravatar
By in United Kingdom,

Ooh, the plane has a few studs. It must be a bit like Lego...

(or Oliver Tobias is on board)

Gravatar
By in United States,

@oldfan: "And that, as much as anything else, led to my drinking problem."

Gravatar
By in United Kingdom,

The airport had some great play features, from the security x-ray machine to putting your suitcase through the departures postbox on the wall for the trolley cart to collect and then the trolley cart would deposit them through the arrivals departure postbox at the other side. The upstairs floor was just two plates either side so a bit precarious getting the coffee! Maybe if the control tower was on the roof, this could have freed up some pieces to make a more substantial waiting area. The petrol station has a tap, but is would have added to the fun to also have a hose to connect to the plane, which as others have said would be better if more brick built and why only 2 and not 4 engines like its blue cousin 7893?

Gravatar
By in United States,

Wow, that one passenger has a whole plane to himself. Also, it looks like the air traffic controller is doing double-duty driving the luggage tug.

Gravatar
By in United States,

@oldfan said:
" @Murdoch17 said:
" @MCLegoboy said:
"How is this airport still in operation? This is less than a skeleton crew, there's only two people to work the whole airport, and the pilot and flight attendant only have one passenger for a massive jet. Times were more than hard in 2010 for LEGO City..."

There is nobody in the flight control tower. This could be a problem on a level not seen since Airplane! films of the 80's. I can hear it now:
Announcer on LEGO City Airport intercom: "Umm, this may be unrelated, but does anybody know how to land a plane... or a few planes?" *panic ensues in the terminal*"


"Looks like I picked the wrong week to quit smoking...""


"Looks like I picked the wrong week to quit drinking..."

Gravatar
By in United States,

@Bricknave:
Believe it or not, that has happened in real life. And that’s on the big commercial flights, not just small commuter/charter flights. Normally they’d just cancel the flight if there’s only one passenger, but they don’t always have that option. If they need the plane or the crew at the next destination, they’d have to make the trip anyways, so might as well take what payment you can get. For the pilots, it’s fairly routine (they do have to compensate for unusual weight distribution), but the flight attendants have a much lighter workload than normal, and the lone passenger tends to get pampered as a result.

Gravatar
By in United States,

@LeonHardJPG said:
" @RaiderOfTheLostBrick said:
"Alongside the 2006 one, this is probably LEGO's best airport. I never owned it, but a childhood friend did."

I can recall that as an under 10 years child I was in absolute love with 6392... Still am.

'O tempora, o mores'"


6396 is the only airport I have, and I love it. I plan to build out some more of the interior, but it's got some displays, security, nice windows, a tower, and several vehicles. It also comes with a runway like 6392 and 6597, which would also be great if I came across them for cheap.

Gravatar
By in Netherlands,

I don't see a forklift. Larry could safely work at this airport.

Gravatar
By in United States,

These always make me miss the four-stud-wide aircraft and airplanes. These never appealed to me because it was too much like Playmobile, not enough building, large specialty pieces. The aircraft are too big for my kids to swoosh around.

Gravatar
By in United States,

The concept of the airport is very hard to implement in a Lego retail set as they are so sprawling and aircraft are so hard to convey with angular bricks. 6597 doesn't really work even in Classic Town layouts because the terminal faces the airstrips, leaving an open back to face your street (or monorail). 6597 doesn't even have an airstrip, it has 3 helipads.

I am firmly of the belief that 6396 International Jetport is the best of the three Classic Town airports, as it actually has an airstrip and the back of the structures are flush with the baseplate to facilitate expansion so it can actually face the infamous companion set 6399.

Gravatar
By in United States,

@CopperTablet said:
I am firmly of the belief that 6396 International Jetport is the best of the three Classic Town airports, as it actually has an airstrip and the back of the structures are flush with the baseplate to facilitate expansion so it can actually face the infamous companion set 6399.]]

How were these two supposed to connect? Now I am dreaming of having a big space with maybe 3 or 4 of 6396 to make a pair of proper terminals, and some roads connecting the 6399 pick-up/drop-off to the city streets. Ah well, it can live in my dreams...

Gravatar
By in United States,

@CopperTablet said:
"The concept of the airport is very hard to implement in a Lego retail set as they are so sprawling and aircraft are so hard to convey with angular bricks. 6597 doesn't really work even in Classic Town layouts because the terminal faces the airstrips, leaving an open back to face your street (or monorail). 6597 doesn't even have an airstrip, it has 3 helipads.

I am firmly of the belief that 6396 International Jetport is the best of the three Classic Town airports, as it actually has an airstrip and the back of the structures are flush with the baseplate to facilitate expansion so it can actually face the infamous companion set 6399."


Not sure where you're seeing 3 helipads...all the photos I see for both 6597 and the re-release 10159 both show a runway. As for the placement? It can easily be relocated to the back or in the opposite direction.

Gravatar
By in United States,

I have this set! I don't love the prefab parts to the plane, but it's still better than some that use the parts (I also have 7893--which feels sparse next to this one), and the airport itself gets the job done. It is quite light on minifigs for what it has going on, but I have way too many Town/City figs, so that's never felt like a problem to me.

Return to home page »