Review: 60304 Road Plates

Posted by ,
View image at Flickr

Road plates were first introduced in 1978 and since then have undergone several design and colour changes. However, none have been as radical as the one that's being made next year, when the traditional 32x32 baseplate is being replaced with a more robust and modular system.

Many of the larger 2021 City sets will include the new system, which BenBarcardi and Mr_Cross will be reviewing in due course. Today, I'm just going to take a quick look at the new parts and how they fit together, using those supplied in 60304 Road Plates.


The system is based around new 16x16 and 8x16 tiles which are two plates high. They have 2x4 cutouts in the centre and 1x4s around the edge to enable them to be connected together.

The 8x16 in this set has white pedestrian crossing lines printed across it.

The undersides have anti-stud connections which of course is not the case with the thin flexible 32x32s.

A new 8x4 curved slope is used to transition from the road to the carpet or table. It's similar to the piece that was introduced in 2014, Ramp 4X8X6,4 W. Wing, but that has studs on the protruding section.

Several 2x4 tiles in the set are printed with white lines to match those on the crossing. They are also used to create a broken line down the centre of the road.

They go together like this:

There are enough parts in the set for a T-junction with pedestrian crossing, and they can of course can be configured in a multitude of different ways to suit your road planning requirements.

Street furniture in the form of two traffic lights, two street lights, a pedestrian crossing sign and a 50 speed limit sign is provided. In the photo below I have positioned them differently to that shown on the box, to account for vehicles driving on the correct side of the road.

There should have been at least one more set of traffic lights: the joining road is not signal controlled at the intersection which of course it not right at all! Alternatively, the provided lights could have used the new 1x1 bricks with studs on two adjacent faces to allow lamps to be fitted to two sides at right-angles.

The carriageways are still a bit narrow for 6-wide vehicles but it's now easy to widen them with additional tiles, or perhaps add a cycle lane, should you wish.

The only other things of note in the set are the 1x2 glow in the dark plate used for the streetlights and the 1x4 tile on top of them printed with a solar panel design, which you can see in the lead photo.

The system is a vast improvement over the old road plates, in particular it's much more flexible and can be configured in myriad ways.

However, inch-for-inch it must be more expensive, which is likely to push up the price of the sets that include it, or, as seems to be the case with some in the 2021 assortment, reduce the number of other parts in them in order to meet a particular price point.

Curved road are going to be impossible to recreate without resorting to DIY with a lot of tiles, but that probably won't worry those of you in the USA :-)

60304 Road Plates will retail for £17.99 / $19.99 / €19.99 when released on 1st January.

BenBarcardi now has our review sample and will be combining it with 60292 Town Centre for his review which we'll be publishing in due course.


Thanks to LEGO for providing this set for review. All opinions expressed are my own.

140 comments on this article

Gravatar
By in Austria,

I wonder what the 2022 modular building will use. I hope they keep the old baseplate.

Gravatar
By in United States,

Finally something new - I've long been frustrated with the options for roads.

Gravatar
By in United States,

In the USA lol?!? I love my curved plates. I’m not moving to this system anyway, I’m not redoing half a city layout in cobblestone. Nope.

Gravatar
By in Norway,

Hm! Looks very nice actually! Much better than I feared. Thanks for this great article!

Gravatar
By in United States,

...I DON'T LIKE CHANGE.

Gravatar
By in United States,

@Spike730 said:
"I wonder what the 2022 modular building will use. I hope they keep the old baseplate."

I don't believe they're getting rid of baseplates, in general. Just road baseplates.

Gravatar
By in United States,

I for one am really excited for these. Building customizable roads in a small setup has never been easier!

Also really useful for elevated roads!

Gravatar
By in United States,

Yeah, neat and not bad price but most of my current city buildings are on baseplates, which would make an annoying height difference. Also, my huge Ninjago vehicles won't be able to even fit on the entire road, much less one side.

Gravatar
By in Belgium,

unless they come up with a way to make curves, this is an epic fail: everything is raised, everything is more expensive, everything needs more adjusting and modification then regular baseplates...

Gravatar
By in United States,

Wow, @Huw really enjoys digging at us Americans :-D

"The correct side of the road"
"carriageways"
"that probably won't worry those of you in the USA"

Gravatar
By in Australia,

I would have preferred a matt surface, glossy looks.... hazardous....

Gravatar
By in Canada,

Can we have a photo of these road plates right up next to a road base plate? I'm tempted to swap out my current city roads for this but am unsure if the roads will be a bit tighter.

Gravatar
By in United States,

" the joining road is not signal controlled at the intersection which of course it not right at all!"

I just visited the Yucatan Peninsula in Mexico. This wouldn't matter at all there. Road signage aside, it is a beautiful place to be.

Gravatar
By in United States,

I still prefer the classic road system. These plates just won't mesh as nicely with previous modular and traditional sets. However, these new plates may come invaluable when building an elevated roadway such as a highway overpass or autobahn. Will I acquire these? No.

Gravatar
By in Australia,

The new road pieces are two plates thick. If you want to combine them with modular buildings on baseplates you will have to put the road pieces on baseplates and raise the modulars by two layers of plates

Gravatar
By in United States,

Hahaha "I have positioned them differently to that shown on the box, to account for vehicles driving on the correct side of the road"

I am American and I love the digs.

Also, why are these not 3 plates high? Seems like that would make it easier to match them up with buildings and stuff in a large city, right? 2-high is a weird number to me.

Gravatar
By in Ireland,

Lego badly needs to embrace baseplates again. My kids Lego is everywhere. The “bittiness” of the builds means it’s really difficult for them to construct a cohesive town/city layout. This isn’t the answer though, as too much of the set cost goes into the base. Lego had a perfect solution in the old 80s/90s baseplates. Why not use those? I do wonder if the rumour is true; where Lego sold off the vac forming machines, when they were in dire financial need.

Gravatar
By in Canada,

For myself, I think I will want to use some of these sets to connect different parts of my daughters' city. For example, there is not an every 32x32 baseplate's worth of space between the airport and Heartlake City. A few of these pieces will nicely fill the gap and make the road continuous.

Gravatar
By in Portugal,

I like these new roadplates very much. Thanks Lego for the improvement!

Gravatar
By in United States,

Thanks for the review, @Huw. I really like these plates. My buildings are already on plates rather than baseplates, so raising them up won't be as big a deal. What I do appreciate about these is the flexibility offered by the sides of the roads. On road baseplates, you have a studded section right next to the roads, so things like parking spots or bike lanes couldn't really be done well.

@Huw, do you . . . do you not think that the USA has curved roads?

Gravatar
By in United Kingdom,

I was pleased to read "correct side" rather than "left side" :-)

Gravatar
By in Canada,

Personally I think that favoring this is over the base plates is a bit of "Stockholm Syndrome" as Lego lovers. Change is important (I dislike "good" as it's case by case) and Lego did many great changes, but removing base plates is not one of them. Not trying to say "80's rocked, modern sets not", but having base plates included was a major enhancement. How are we OK with going from the older train crossing to the current insulting ones ? (and that's just one quick example, there are many more).

It's not the same height as base plates so will be harder to fit, it's harder to quickly change layouts for game or temporary layouts as we need to re-built it. Too narrow and more expensive.

In the risk of sounding "old and grumpy changes hater", I think I'll stick to the 3rd party baseplates from Ali Express for a while.

Gravatar
By in United Kingdom,

I wasn't sure about the shift from the old 32x32 plates, but now I've seen an in depth look at the new system I'm completely behind it - lots of potential for wider roads and more complex arrangements.

Gravatar
By in United Kingdom,

I like the flexibility of these. I don't have a road at the moment for my modular street but I might try adding one.

I do have old road baseplates (late 80s/early 90s version I think) but they are unused in the cupboard because they are too big for the space I have for my modular street.

I've seen a couple of suggestions for how the height issue can be solved with modulars and the new road plates, I'll be interested to see what people do who decide to switch to the new roads.

Gravatar
By in Italy,

They will be super useful for big flat elevated structures, like SW landing pads or that sort of thing. Just replace the printed 2x4s with plain dbg ones and you’re good to go with a 32x32 square with just one set.

Gravatar
By in United States,

I'm hoping for a curved road solution in 2022!

Gravatar
By in United Kingdom,

@ArmoredBricks said:
"Wow, @Huw really enjoys digging at us Americans :-D

"The correct side of the road"
"carriageways"
"that probably won't worry those of you in the USA""


It's always a pleasure to have a little dig when the opportunity arises ;)

Gravatar
By in United States,

Why would Americans not need curves? You do realize that most of us don't live in Manhattan, right?

While it will be a lot more expensive to build a long road with these than with baseplates, I still think this is the right move for LEGO. They've been moving away from baseplates for a while now (when was the last time you saw them in a set, aside from the modular buildings?) so road baseplates already didn't match up with the sets most kids have in their collections.

Nearly all current sets build on plates (hence the introduction of 16x16 plates a few years ago) which is a lot more flexible and makes sets easier to package. (No need to have the box wide enough to fit a 32x32 baseplate when a few 16x16 plates can be used instead.)

I'm sure even the modulars will have to ditch the baseplate at some point, either 2022 or 2023. Yeah, it will be annoying for those who have a whole shelf of modulars on display; you'll either have to rebuild the old ones, figure out how to build the new ones on baseplates, or live with a mismatched street. But the number of people impacted by that is tiny in the big pictured going forward it makes sense for LEGO to have a more consistent* and more flexible system.

* The mismatch between baseplate and plate-based sets has been a problem for as long as baseplates have existed. Just look at the '80s Castle sets; a few of the larger castles were on baseplates but many of the mid-sized castles and all of the smaller wall-segment sets were built on plates. Look at the 1984 Castle sets: 6080 King's Castle was built on baseplates but 6073 Knight's Castle and 6040 Blacksmith Shop were on plates. All the 1986 sets were on plates: 6041 Armor Shop, 6067 Guarded Inn, and 6074 Black Falcon's Fortress. In 1987 we once again had a mix: 6062 Battering Ram on plates but 6066 Camouflaged Outpost on baseplates. Same in 1988: 6054 Forestmen's Hideout was on plates yet 6085 Black Monarch's Castle was on baseplates. And so on.

Gravatar
By in United States,

*sniff* Beautiful.

Gravatar
By in United Kingdom,

I'll reserve judgement until I see them 'in the flesh' but, from the photo, they look awful! Much more toy like than the current plates. Will look even worse if Lego continues with it's current inability to produce elements in the same consistent shade. And, as currently, you seem to be forced to buy unwanted items... Just how many zebra crossings does one road need!
However, if these are replacements, and not just alternatives to the current items, Christmas has certainly arrived for the 3rd party road plate manufacturers!

Gravatar
By in United States,

Not a fan simply because of the higher cost. I've been stocking up on older baseplates for a while because of this.

The major issue with the current baseplate roads is that you can't get two of the same kind in one pack, which is just silly.

Gravatar
By in United Kingdom,

Feels like a thing for AFOLs. Not sure my 6yo would care for this. She currently has a 3x3 town she can quickly reconfigure without having to rebuild a ton of expensive roadway. Also, in every set I’ve seen with these, the roads are higher than their surroundings, which is the opposite of roads in most countries. It’s all a bit odd.

Gravatar
By in France,

What a heck of big parts... I'm really disappointed by this system, it will be much more expansive and we will soon all have buckets full of these curved slopes. I like the modularity and the ability to build single-lane alleys, huge hifgways or large avenues, but it will be hard to harmoniously integrate with the existing and well installed baseplate system. The best use I see is for roadbridges, it will allow a better integration of roadt han 8x16 tiles.

Gravatar
By in Germany,

„Correct side of the road“ ??????
Reminds me of „Asterix in Britain“!

Gravatar
By in United States,

So I can have a barely 6 wide side of a road or a 12 wide road in each direction? How does this fit for the Speed Champion line? They are all at least 8 wide, as are many other vehicles from other themes. So now I need a 12 wide road in each direction? If you are taking the road plates away or replacing them, just go to MILS roads and let folks build as wide or as small as they want. Just give em a parts pack to do it at a more reasonable price.

Gravatar
By in Canada,

Nope.

Gravatar
By in United States,

The new system is certainly more customizable, but I think the baseplates are still better. I'm planning my first city display right now, and just purchased several road baseplates from Amazon. I don't have the room for a huge city, and the baseplates are quite irritating because I need multiple straight track pieces but have no use for the T-junction plates they're packaged with. In that regard, the new system is better because there's less "waste". However, the lack of curves is confusing and the fact that they're raised up basically ruins them for me. I don't want a road that's two plates higher than my modular buildings, and there's no easy way to raise those up since you can't connect studs to the bottom of baseplates. I guess this new system is perfect for creating highways and other raised sections of road, though!

Gravatar
By in Netherlands,

Looks like a good system. Just hope there will be some bends ahead!

Gravatar
By in United States,

Major construction scene where old and new roads join? :D

Gravatar
By in Australia,

Haha everyone knows the right side of the road is the right side of the road!

The new system has some benefits and I do like it integrated with sets however it is ridiculously more expensive and I think the main thing thats wrong with these is that there is no transition and no need.

Specifically, the vast majority of lego fans with a city layout that would use roads would very likely be using road baseplates, this leaves no transition, while any likely new buyers would be either new AFOLs who could have continued with baseplates, but more importantly kids.

Do kids really want a random section of road outside a building anymore then they want a road baseplate? I dont think so.
It just drags up the price and takes away from potential builds, especially from a childs perspective.

Its somewhat good for a city building AFOL like me but then apart from this one set, the only way to get enough pieces for a long straight road for example is to buy those expensive City sets, maybe that modern house thing. Theres no way Im paying $80+ just to get two more road plates (since this Road Plates set would likely soon sell out, or not sell at all)

Finally of course there is the absence of curves, how is one supposed to create a city layout if you can only do straights? Youd think Lego would work out a system that WORKS first before releasing half and then maybe a year later turn up with another Road Plates set, oh by the way guys heres the curves.

Gravatar
By in France,

so glad that the white lines are printed and not stickers. Lining up white lines would have been a nightmare !!!

Surely Lego has foreseen a curved accessory ? I can't believe they would limit town builders to a square grid system...

Gravatar
By in Estonia,

We probably will not get the curved sections... It would be OK if this solution was made for the 4+ line and we'd still be left the classic baseplates. On the other hand, previous attempts with new types of baseplates have all failed (every 10 years this century, Racer ramps; Racers Fold-Out Race Track), I hope this one soon vanishes too.
Also: The set is named "Road plates" and the box calls out "Road plates included" (sic!).

I personally think that LEGO should just enlarge all the standard baseplates from 32x32 to 48x48 (incl widening the lanes (runways) for the wider cars (planes)). Larger baseplates means more area to fill with builds and wouldn't that suggest more sets sold?

Gravatar
By in United Kingdom,

Lego could always sell the new road plates as 'City' and rebrand the old ones as 18+ (with 2 identical plates in each package)!

Gravatar
By in Canada,

I use grey 1x? Bricks to make SNOT roadway, and wider than any LEGO standard to date. It quite easily holds 6 stud vehicles, unlike most of the LEGO standards. Sorry, I definitely will not switch to this.

Gravatar
By in United States,

The only advantage of this new system of roadways for me is I can now easily build a proper-width runway for my airport. I much prefer the former style for everything else.

The question is what to do with several dozen sloped pieces? Each pack should only include two slopes in my opinion.

Gravatar
By in Australia,

The cynical part of my brain is thinking that Lego only did this because it's going to be so much more expensive. If you need a curved roadway, you have to buy a lot of grey pieces. If you need to extend the lanes to 8 wide (which you'd have to, with so many wider vehicles these days), then again, you have to buy a lot of extra grey pieces. And shoving these into town sets is just going to jack up the price on those sets for all these new, large, grey pieces.

I am not at all a fan of this.

Gravatar
By in United States,

Not sure yet if I am a fan of the new road plates, but for now I will continue to snatch up all the base plates and road plates I can find at sales and auctions, etc. In my opinion, they will never go out of style.

Gravatar
By in United States,

Glow in the dark streetlights are a cool idea

Also, I was initially uncertain about these but they're actually pretty cool.

Gravatar
By in United States,

This review cinched it. I'm all in on this new roadway system. I did not buy enough of the road baseplates back in the 90s and early 2000s, and I really didn't want to have to commit to building custom roads to go between my modulars and other Town buildings. This solves all my problems, even giving me pieces to support rail crossings should any streets intersect with my railway. I guess this set will be the 2021 equivalent of the Benny's Space Squad for me, as I plan to buy immediately as many of these as I can get my hands on!

Plus, I can now save my classic baseplates for the countryside roads that meander outside the grid of the city!

Gravatar
By in United Kingdom,

Thanks for this review, they look fantastic. Lots of potential for fans’ custom layouts as well, integrating track and width of roads.

Gravatar
By in United States,

@Huw The first road plate was actually in 1970, "No. 078 Roadway Base Plate"

Gravatar
By in Romania,

At least as interested in what somebody thinks about a new set am I in the part list for that new set. Heck, I am more interested in the part list than I am in what somebody thinks about that set! Can we see the part list, then, before we are told what somebody thinks about them?

Gravatar
By in Hungary,

Actually I don't like these roadplates. The only good thing is the printed 2x4 tile.
Previously you could do any kind of road layouts made of tiles layed on baseplates, whatever width you wanted. Why is this consedered as an improvement?
For the price of this set you can by 2x2 road baseplates. Ok, those don't include trees, traffic signs, traffic lights, etc., but make much bigger layout.

Gravatar
By in United States,

I'm guessing that curves are coming for 2022. I really love this system, the existing road baseplates have massive studded curbs that look unattractive. With hinge bricks, you can also make double-decker streets like the real-world Wacker Avenue in Chicago.

Gravatar
By in United Kingdom,

These are similar to Brio road pieces - they suggest parts of a larger road and allow children to extend the scenes in their imaginations (like how minifigs go up to the next floor without stairs).

I love the limited grid system of the base plates - easy, defined, customisable. And I can see the potential for the new system to extend and break out of those limitations, especially for space layouts: raised roadways leading to tall launchpads, maybe. Or cramped cities, or smaller layouts for people like me with less room for a permanent display. Or for a race track... they really need curves though.

There's nothing to stop anyone using a mix of green and grey baseboard for eclectic road widths (emulating the old Town backgrounds on set boxes), base plates and the new road system all mixed together.

Gravatar
By in United States,

The plus side to these is it will allow rail crossings to look correct in cities. The customization is endless. The negative side is what everyone will have to do to their modulars to make them look right.

@Huw - You should try visiting the West Coast of the U.S. sometime:
https://www.sftodo.com/sanfrancisco/crooked-street-lombard/:~:text=Lombard%20Street%20in%20San%20Francisco,hill%20past%20beautiful%20Victorian%20mansions.

Gravatar
By in Puerto Rico,

@reardonmj said:
"In the USA lol?!? I love my curved plates. I’m not moving to this system anyway, I’m not redoing half a city layout in cobblestone. Nope."

Agree, I hope we can still get the other plates.

Gravatar
By in Denmark,

Now I think Lego can make us a 22.5 degree 8x16 wedge-like road plate (think similar to how 15706 A-frame 45degree plate's are used to orient a building by 45degrees) to allow us to build custom angles and curves into city roads.

Gravatar
By in Germany,

Hm.. very torn on between these systems. The new one works fine but I think I prefer the looks of the old base plates, less pieces and just as usable as the new system.

Gravatar
By in United States,

I love how the company that supplies one of the most OCD hobbies on the planet is constantly changing things.

These look great for hangar walls, too. I hope they’re not too expensive.

Gravatar
By in United States,

The new layout is nice but, unfortunately the size of this New Road is smaller than the previous Road Base Plate. That one you can fit a Semi or Tow Truck, so on, easily. On this, those vehicles will be a little too big in size....

Gravatar
By in United States,

PROS:
* Very modular and customizable

TBD:
* Are we REQUIRED to have speed bumps in the road or are there 4 gray tile pieces that can replace those?

CONS:
* SUPER expensive compared to the already-expensive road plates of old. (A $15 package of 2 could get you enough road for 64 studs of length!) These are $20 and give you far less road! BOO!
* No curves...at least not this year. Maybe 2022? ...or maybe we're confined to urban city roads forever.
* Would be nice if the half-width piece used for the crosswalk was unpainted so it could be used to make a road have 3 lanes of width (for a turning lane, bike lane, etc.)
* Lights and signs should just be in an Xtra pack or only included when there's something like a building along with the road to keep the cost down on the basic road pieces.
* No more solid white lines in the center of the road. Dashed lines only! Go ahead and pass anywhere.
* Where the road meets the other road at the intersection, there shouldn't be lines in the center of that primary road...at least not in the United States or Canada. Again, I hope there are extra blank tiles.

OVERALL:
* I'm stocking up on old plates as much as I can. Not sure what my needs are since I'm still planning out my basement city after moving into this new house...but I don't want to get stuck with less than I need.
* I'll get some of this to experiment with...maybe an elevated road? Maybe for a 4-lane boulevard with trees down the center? I've got some ideas for integrating train track too. ...but I'm never going to commit to replacing everything with this especially since it would complicate all my modular buildings and most of my baseplate-based collection that dates back to the early 80s.
* I recall hearing years ago that Lego outsourced baseplate and road plate molding to another company and this is why the prices always seemed jacked up and why they were cutting back on those recently. No idea if this is true.
* I wonder if these pieces will be available via Pick A Brick.

@Huw said:
"vehicles driving on the correct side of the road."
Look, you can claim the metric system is better than what we use in the US, but most of the world drives on the RIGHT side of the road. RIGHT is CORRECT! In this case, it's you guys who are weird.

@DavidBrick wrote:
"I really don't get the dig about the USA and curves roads. Have the reviewer never been to the USA? It makes no sense."
I know it's supposed to be a joke, but it really comes off as ignorant.

Gravatar
By in United Kingdom,

I don't really get the price complaints - to build a similar junction with the old road baseplates you'd need 4 baseplates - two packs, costing £21. And technically you'd need 4 packs to get 3 straights and a T-junction. This costs £18 and includes 4 and a half plates, along with assorted street furniture.

Sure they're smaller, but the city sets are generally smaller than the 32 baseplates anyway.

Personally I like the look of them. They look much more flexible than the old baseplates (and will take up less space). I don't have a city layout myself, but I could imagine our little boy liking the system and happily building a layout with a few sets.

Gravatar
By in United Kingdom,

Once you've put a 2x4 tile in one of the four centre slots, how would you ever get them out again if you ever wanted to change things around?

Gravatar
By in United States,

I do not plan on getting these, but for those who do plan on it and who want to do curves, I imagine a potential solution would be to use the current 32x32 curved road baseplate and use the ramp pieces to drop the level of the road when the straight road comes to a curve. The only problem is that the current generation of road baseplates are 20 studs wide and these are 16 studs wide. Though I imagine you could use 2 stud wide tiles on either side of the new roads to make them the same width as the current generation of roads. The problem would be the ramp pieces being 8 studs wide. LEGO would need to introduce a 4 stud wide version of them for this to work seamlessly.

Gravatar
By in United States,

Not sure who this is for.. Kinda pricey for kids (who would likely want to use that 20 USD for actual playable sets/parts) and not sure why AFOLS, more to the point large scale MOC creators, would abandon their already likely large investment, used for their existing layouts, for something like this. I mean I see these in the new city sets and it ticks me off a bit that I'm paying for those in addition to a smaller building (or City scene) that would have likely been a bit larger or a bit cheaper without the road system plates also being in the set.

Gravatar
By in United States,

Yeah, Huw, you do realize that the US probably has more curved roads than the UK has UK. I do know for a fact that our National Park System has more acreage (but then again, our second largest park is bigger than Belgium). Also, right is right. Left is a bit sinister.

My LUG has no plans to use these. When we found out about them, we bought more roadplates. You can't set up a layout of a few hundred square feet in a single morning if you're messing around with these, plus we have buildings in our club that weigh a few hundred pounds. When they're built on baseplates, they slide easily across any table surface, where plated bottoms will catch on uneven surfaces and potentially shear the sidewalls off. And if we used these for our roads, plus two more plates for sidewalk height, then we'd have to add at least a full brick height to the underside of every building.

Curved roadplates are a special problem. If you run two sets of train track down a 32x baseplate with equal spacing, the inside curve nicely matches a curved road that's placed in the corners. There's no good way to run roads alongside the track if there's no option for curved roadways. Trying to put this in the corner would either require a series of hairpin turns to pull the corner away from the track, or you'd have to leave the corners vacant.

@guachi:
@GoldenNinja3000
My LUG has the same problem. The ratio of roads used in our layouts skews very heavily to straights, with a varying mix of the other three. Our road system uses the current roadplates, with a 6-stud median, onto which we add a 7-stud sidewalk that actually covers a bit of the road surface. This was originally done because we just needed the larger sidewalks to accommodate the trees that line either side of our streets. One unintentional benefit of this is that the sidewalks also cover up the lines painted down the sides of the roads. A few years ago, we realized that this actually makes it possible to turn any T into a section of straight road, and any 4-way into a T. At this point, I think most of our T stock has been converted to straights, and our 4-ways have been fairly evenly split between the T and 4-way configurations. I've actually got a small set of my own roadplates that have entrances incorporated for my parking lots, and there's one pair that have removable sidewalk sections that allow me to convert them from T's to straights with minimal fuss.

Gravatar
By in United States,

@Angel_Clanger said:
"Once you've put a 2x4 tile in one of the four centre slots, how would you ever get them out again if you ever wanted to change things around?"
If you look closely (the top picture shows it better), there are Technic holes in those slots so that you can poke tiles (or any part, really) out from underneath.

Gravatar
By in United States,

I am a huge fan of these. I am an AFOL who has some road-plates. I look forward to the flexibility.

Gravatar
By in United Kingdom,

I'm in the group who will be stocking up on current baseplates.

For me, these are just going to be far too much hassle and would require a massive amount of extra work and parts to get them to work in any relatively simple-to-set-up modular-based layout.

In this set, there's a lot of wastage, with the plant pieces and the slopes, which you're just not going to use, when joining up multiples of these sections, and then you also have the issue of getting a huge load of extra plates and tiles to fill in the gaps between your buildings and the roads to create pavements etc.

Finally, as mentioned above, the 32x32 baseplates make it far simpler to re-arrange a layout in nice, easy to handle chunks.

Gravatar
By in United States,

@Angel_Clanger:
This is old hat for them. Anytime they design a part with a recessed studded area, that has no open sides, they divide the space up into 2x2 sections and make sure that every one of those has a Technic pin hole in the center. This makes it impossible to tile the surface in a way that prevents you from being able to completely strip the tiles loose. If you cover it with 1x1 tiles, you can get four of them to pop loose by pressing on their corners through one of the holes. Once you've got even a single tile free, you can go after the rest with a crowbar (minifig, not human). Plates are a bit trickier, as there's rarely enough room to get inside the pits with a brick separator, so you really would need to use the Technic holes to remove even the last of a group of plates.

The one exception I know of to this is the LEGO Wiimote for the Nintendo Wii. The studded pit is only 1x, so there's no way to incorporate Technic holes throughout (nor would it be practical to do so given the electronics located inside). Instead, they included an angled sidewall where you can fit the tip of a crowbar and pop a single tile free, giving you access to the next tile in line. The only problem here is that it assumes you tiled the pit. If you build it out with plates, there's really no good way to get the first one started. Furthermore, there were pictures of these Wiimotes that included a prototype brick separator which was a red 1-wide version of the current standard design, and which was eventually dropped in favor of the crowbar element. Since that never got produced, there's no tool that's specifically designed to make it easy to remove plates from a 1x channel. So, you could really get yourself into a pickle if you line those channels with long plates, as you might find that the only way to remove them after the fact is to grab onto the studs with pliers, permanently damaging the stud.

Gravatar
By in Sweden,

So people complain that you need to rebuild on plate if you have the modular line, instead of using the road plates... But you had to rebuild on the road plates anyways, otherwise the road was miles away from the sidewalk, with studs inbetween...

I think those look really good, and if all it takes is replacing baseplates with 16X16 plates, it's not too bad a deal for then excellent connectivity. I'll be buying a bunch for sure, and I hope they've prepared stocks!

Gravatar
By in Canada,

@PDelahanty said:
"* SUPER expensive compared to the already-expensive road plates of old. (A $15 package of 2 could get you enough road for 64 studs of length!) These are $20 and give you far less road! BOO!
* No curves...at least not this year. Maybe 2022? ...or maybe we're confined to urban city roads forever.
* Would be nice if the half-width piece used for the crosswalk was unpainted so it could be used to make a road have 3 lanes of width (for a turning lane, bike lane, etc.)
* No more solid white lines in the center of the road. Dashed lines only! Go ahead and pass anywhere.
* Where the road meets the other road at the intersection, there shouldn't be lines in the center of that primary road...at least not in the United States or Canada. Again, I hope there are extra blank tiles."


* I'm not sure what you mean about the length. One copy of 60304 is enough to build a straight 2-lane road 72 studs long, even without counting the extra length added by the ramps.
* I definitely expect that LEGO will probably end up coming up with a curve plate for this system, especially if they decide to use it for racetracks as well as roads.
* Some of the other upcoming 2021 City sets like the family house and skate park include an unprinted version of the 8x16 road segment!
* This is definitely a valid criticism, but it also applies to all the road baseplates of the past decade and a half — the only set EVER that had the same road width as the current road baseplates but with a solid center line is 10159-1. All other road baseplates have either had narrower roads or dashed lines like the current ones.
* There are a few "extra" 2x4 tiles in this set if you count the ones used to attach the green plates to the road. That said, T-intersection road baseplates also always had dashed lines in the middle of the intersection, so LEGO has seemingly never been bothered that this doesn't adhere to US standards.

Gravatar
By in United States,

Ooh, I hope we get some of those 2x4 dark grey tiles with printed yellow lines at some point. In the USA and Canada, at least, yellow lines denote that the traffic goes separate ways, while white lines indicate that the lanes are going in the same direction. Of course, my Lego town isn’t set in America, so it doesn’t bother me—but the ability to modify the lines is certainly a big upside of these new road plates, as well.

Gravatar
By in United States,

I can see some benefits as a parts pack for Mocs but for a city layout I’ll be sticking to the old style road plates. I hope LEGO phases out the 32x32 style slowly as I’m sure a lot of people will be stocking up before retirement.

Gravatar
By in Canada,

@Lego_Lord_Mayorca said:
"This review cinched it. I'm all in on this new roadway system. I did not buy enough of the road baseplates back in the 90s and early 2000s, and I really didn't want to have to commit to building custom roads to go between my modulars and other Town buildings. This solves all my problems, even giving me pieces to support rail crossings should any streets intersect with my railway. I guess this set will be the 2021 equivalent of the Benny's Space Squad for me, as I plan to buy immediately as many of these as I can get my hands on!

Plus, I can now save my classic baseplates for the countryside roads that meander outside the grid of the city!"


Just curious, how do you plan to handle curves? I hope LEGO eventually releases a curves pack but that's uncertain at this time. In the meantime or if they just don't come up with such pack, how would you approach curves in your city with the new road system?

Gravatar
By in United States,

Re: the curved roads joke

Oh we have them here in the US, the 495 beltway in Maryland is the bane of my existence

Gravatar
By in United States,

It’s...
-More expensive
-Worse than they current system (arguably)
-Not compatible with the current system
-Makes existing sets more expensive with less in them
-Not desirable enough for kids, and too expensive for AFOLs to efficiently use in their larger creations.

This is... just a bad idea from LEGO. It’s not like this product on it’s own is awful, but it’s terrible as a replacement. The whole point of this toy is it’s highly compatible with both past and future sets, so this design goes against that.

Gravatar
By in United Kingdom,

With regard to Huw's comment about the prevalence of straight roads within the US, I think everyone is aware that every country in the world contains roads that are fairly straight and others which are exceptionally winding.

However, comparing maps of European and American cities clearly suggests that structured blocks, divided by straight roads, are much more prevalent in North America than in Europe. Of course, exceptions exist on both sides of the Atlantic, such as Boston in the US or Milton Keynes in the UK, but these really are exceptions. That may be attributed to their respective ages and the planning involved in their development. Numerous major cities in the UK have grown over several hundred years while those in the US usually developed more rapidly and with more consistent town planning.

I would also add that absolutely straight roads are rather uncommon in general across the UK, including motorways. The longest section of road which is considered truly straight is only fifteen miles in length and even that includes some subtle bends. Wherever you spot longer sections of straight road on UK maps, it is usually because it follows the route of an ancient Roman road.

Gravatar
By in United States,

@CapnRex101:
Yes, the US had the luxury of being able to use urban planning to develop the eventual layouts of many large cities, to varying degrees of success. We also were able to develop the US highway system decades after the invention of the automobile, and replace that with the US freeway system after figuring out all the things we did wrong the first time.

If you look at Manhattan, they pointedly developed the city to have E/W and N/S roads in a clear grid pattern, but that was done to allow sunlight to shine down the roads from sunrise to sunset, where twisty, windy roads would result in some parts of the city only receiving direct sunlight for a brief period around noon, and possibly only at certain times of the year. Less vertical communities have less to worry about, and rail-straight roads encourage (or at least fail to discourage) reckless speeders.

The result is that now it's common to see the major roads follow a strict grid (in Metro Detroit these occur every mile, with secondary roads on the half-miles), but the residential roads between often look like a plate of spaghetti. One consequence is that people literally can't cut through one of the residential areas just to bypass rush-hour traffic on the main roads, because you can never predict where you'll end up. You also can't drag-race through the residential areas because in many places you can't get more than a few hundred feet of straightaway.

The highway system was patterned after the fabled Autobahn, and the famous change made for the newer freeway system was to bypass communities rather than plunge right through their centers. A less well-known change was the result of safety studies. Highways tended to only change directions when forced to by natural and manmade barriers, or to connect the dots of various communities that aren't laid out in a nice, straight line. Freeways curve a _lot_. Sometimes it's very gradual, to the point where you might not even really notice it. Other times it's like driving a go-cart track.

The reason for this is that driving straight, level roads for long distances is one of the most effective cures for insomnia known to mankind. Everyone from long-haul truckers to families on vacation are at significant risk of dozing off while driving these stretches late at night. Introducing varying curves into the freeway system forces drivers to more actively pay attention to what they're doing, which in turn helps keep them awake (and if it doesn't, they're more likely to make a quick exit from the road).

Gravatar
By in United States,

I only just got my first road baseplates (in a bunch of used parts from a non-AFOL friend's old collection), but I definitely think I'll be picking these up for one major reason: they'll make building road work so much easier! I like to MOC construction equipment (among other things), so the idea that I could integrate these plates with regular tiles and build underneath them is very exciting to me. I've always had an issue with baseplates being the definitive bottom layer of a build, even as a kid, so these are really cool despite my childhood dependence on (non-road) baseplates for play.

Gravatar
By in United States,

I'd definitely widen the roads by adding to them, or using extension pieces of some kind should they ever make more variety in this new system.

Overall the new roads seem cool, but I can easily understand that those who've invested in a previous system would have reservations.

Gravatar
By in Netherlands,

I don't mind the basic road pack, but the prices on some of the larger City sets look to be a bit overpriced overall in terms of getting them mainly for the roads.

Now I'm hoping LEGO will release some Xtra road signs, and more of those glow in the dark lanterns, after all they already had 40311 Traffic lights and 40312 Streetlamps the other years.

Gravatar
By in United States,

@bricks4everyone said:
" @Lego_Lord_Mayorca said:
"This review cinched it. I'm all in on this new roadway system. I did not buy enough of the road baseplates back in the 90s and early 2000s, and I really didn't want to have to commit to building custom roads to go between my modulars and other Town buildings. This solves all my problems, even giving me pieces to support rail crossings should any streets intersect with my railway. I guess this set will be the 2021 equivalent of the Benny's Space Squad for me, as I plan to buy immediately as many of these as I can get my hands on!

Plus, I can now save my classic baseplates for the countryside roads that meander outside the grid of the city!"


Just curious, how do you plan to handle curves? I hope LEGO eventually releases a curves pack but that's uncertain at this time. In the meantime or if they just don't come up with such pack, how would you approach curves in your city with the new road system?"


So, of my original 90's LEGO Town road plate collection, I own a few curves that I plan to integrate into my layout in the interim. I know this means the transition area from dark bley plate roads to old light gray baseplate roads will look funky, but I really plan to keep curves in the countryside. My particular layout is constrained to a narrow, rectangular space that will favor a grid layout of streets, anyway. Perhaps a well-placed railway crossing will handle the transition from straight, dark gray streets to the curves of the wilderland just outside the city limits.

Gravatar
By in Malaysia,

Looks like useful pieces for building flat city rooftops, with options to install helipads, water tanks, billboards and so on. Meanwhile, the classic space fan in me imagines a landing pad constructed using 4 pieces of 16x16 plates with lights placed at strategic locations to form a circle, a spaceship with a cavernous cargo hold using 16x16 plates as the roof and the floor, and a ground base with walkways connected to several individual16x16 plates which serve as landing pads for an assortment of small spacecraft. Can't wait to see creations using these as "space plates"!

Gravatar
By in Canada,

@Lego_Lord_Mayorca said:
" @bricks4everyone said:
" @Lego_Lord_Mayorca said:
"This review cinched it. I'm all in on this new roadway system. I did not buy enough of the road baseplates back in the 90s and early 2000s, and I really didn't want to have to commit to building custom roads to go between my modulars and other Town buildings. This solves all my problems, even giving me pieces to support rail crossings should any streets intersect with my railway. I guess this set will be the 2021 equivalent of the Benny's Space Squad for me, as I plan to buy immediately as many of these as I can get my hands on!

Plus, I can now save my classic baseplates for the countryside roads that meander outside the grid of the city!"


Just curious, how do you plan to handle curves? I hope LEGO eventually releases a curves pack but that's uncertain at this time. In the meantime or if they just don't come up with such pack, how would you approach curves in your city with the new road system?"


So, of my original 90's LEGO Town road plate collection, I own a few curves that I plan to integrate into my layout in the interim. I know this means the transition area from dark bley plate roads to old light gray baseplate roads will look funky, but I really plan to keep curves in the countryside. My particular layout is constrained to a narrow, rectangular space that will favor a grid layout of streets, anyway. Perhaps a well-placed railway crossing will handle the transition from straight, dark gray streets to the curves of the wilderland just outside the city limits."


All right, glad you've figured out an approach that works for you. I don't have a LEGO city but I'm really curious about how people who do will adapt to this change if they choose to. There is a YouTube channel called Bevins Bricks run by an AFOL who uses his own road system (which has some similarities with the new one offered by LEGO) and showed his approach to curves. The lines don't look a smooth as I'd like  but it's an interesting approach nonetheless.

Gravatar
By in United States,

I think these are going to be really handy for building elevated highways. My Ninjago City could use some decorating ;)

"There should have been at least one more set of traffic lights: the joining road is not signal controlled at the intersection which of course it not right at all! Alternatively, the provided lights could have used the new 1x1 bricks with studs on two adjacent faces to allow lamps to be fitted to two sides at right-angles."
^ I have no idea if I'm reading this right or not but, they have traffic lights at T-intersections? I've only ever seen yield or stop signs for the joining road.

"Curved road are going to be impossible to recreate without resorting to DIY with a lot of tiles, but that probably won't worry those of you in the USA :-)"
^ If you're talking about city building that's probably true but with the amount of green in this set it seems to be more of a park or highway, and those roads are *super* curvy. We've got one out of town that literally wraps round a set of hills to cross a river and get above a valley.

Gravatar
By in Canada,

Have any of you ever been to Saskatchewan? That’s where the no curved roads joke really applies. Of course, you don’t need any traffic signals or crosswalks for Saskatchewan roads either. I believe this is what cruise control was invented for. If you had perfect alignment on your car, you could set the cruise control and take a nap while driving across Saskatchewan.

Gravatar
By in Hungary,

Thank you very much, this is a great review, unveiling the new pieces. (For some reason though, I find the "puns" more insulting and biased than funny - still from Europe...)
I did not see it added yet, but these road plates seem to be highly compatible with the 6063310 8x8 elements released earlier (eg.: 10767).

Gravatar
By in South Africa,

From my perspective, these come at a great time. I have just now really reached the means to start a city layout, so I can plan it with the new baseplates and not have to swop out anytime soon.

Gravatar
By in Denmark,

Roads? Where we are going we don't need roads…

Gravatar
By in Austria,

I prefer road baseplates as they come with included parking space on the roadside. With a few modifications I've made my Downtown Diner a corner building and connected it to the road plates with tiles, while all other road plates are connected to each other with flower planters between the parking spaces.

Gravatar
By in United Kingdom,

For my part I'm glad they're ditching baseplates at last. They were never a good idea. Out of system, soft bendy plastic, badly moulded studs. Who wants a baseplate you can't even pick up when it's built on? And no anti studs.

What I *want* is a 32x32 plate. And ideally a 45% curve for one of these. Reckon the "1980s was the peak of civilization" brigade will be a bit quieter when we can build roads with as many angles as our train tracks.

Gravatar
By in Netherlands,

Looks nice, looks much sturdier than baseplates. But they also look much more expensive and with less surface area. I'm not sure if I'm a fan.

Gravatar
By in Belgium,

@Aanchir said:
" @PDelahanty said:
"* This is definitely a valid criticism, but it also applies to all the road baseplates of the past decade and a half — the only set EVER that had the same road width as the current road baseplates but with a solid center line is 10159-1 . All other road baseplates have either had narrower roads or dashed lines like the current ones.
."
."


not entirely true, since set 10159 came in 2 versions ( 10159-1 and 10159-2 , wich both had different piece counts), it is technically present in 2 sets :p

Gravatar
By in United Kingdom,

@stratiformus said:
"I would have preferred a matt surface, glossy looks.... hazardous...."

Exactly what I first thought - a shame they aren’t like the large 6x16 tiles that have a Matt surface - black would have been nicer too.

Gravatar
By in United States,

My city uses a canal system like Ninjago so I won't even be thinking of these as roads. However they could perhaps be good for raising up buildings in my city.

Gravatar
By in United Kingdom,

LEGO create hundreds of new moulds every year, so I’m sure it’s not beyond their expertise to bring to fruition a set of curved road pieces. There’s always the chance that they could do this and make them incompatible with these road plates, but then again we might be really lucky - you never know.

Gravatar
By in United Kingdom,

I really think Lego designed these new road plates only with children sets in mind, as children's play sets. They work fine on their own, or can be linked with other sets to enhance play. It is probably why there is no curved road plate. It just keeps it simple.

I don't think they ever had in mind these being used by AFOL's and the way they like to have a city layout. Maybe we will see 18+ road plates with more advanced options on base plates that work better with the modulars.

Gravatar
By in United Kingdom,

@CCC said:
"I think they look great but could have been improved. That zebra crossing, instead of having just the centre hole (why? Odd choice) remove all the stripes so it is completely customisable. It could be a plain road extension or crossing or tiled in a different way for drains or manhole covers and so on."

There is also an unprinted version of the 8x16 road plate, just not included in this expansion pack. That'll be why the zebra crossing just has one hole for a tile—it's just a printed version of another mold and fits in with the rest of the road plates.

Gravatar
By in United States,

@GSR_MataNui:
It depends on the size of the roads, and how much traffic they get. Near where I live, there's a T intersection with two thru-lanes in each E/W/S direction, two westbound left turn lanes, one eastbound turn lane, and three northbound lanes in a double-Y split (one left, one right, and the center one can turn left or right). Absolutely they put a stoplight there. Freeway exits often T at stoplights as well.

Gravatar
By in Jordan,

@PurpleDave said:
"Left is a bit sinister."

I had to read it twice, but this is brilliant.

As for the road system, I think it's useful for Lego City, seeing that it had ditched baseplates a long time ago. I just hope they keep the baseplates for the Modular Buildings, as it would be a huge inconvenience with little benefit to switch over to regular plates for those.

Gravatar
By in United Kingdom,

@Explorer6890 said:
"Looks like useful pieces for building flat city rooftops, with options to install helipads, water tanks, billboards and so on. Meanwhile, the classic space fan in me imagines a landing pad constructed using 4 pieces of 16x16 plates with lights placed at strategic locations to form a circle, a spaceship with a cavernous cargo hold using 16x16 plates as the roof and the floor, and a ground base with walkways connected to several individual16x16 plates which serve as landing pads for an assortment of small spacecraft. Can't wait to see creations using these as "space plates"!"

Agree, I will be using the 16x16 as floors and roofs of space hangers, with the pedestrian walkways placed at 90 degrees to form landing areas. Only problem is I will need several sets so will get expensive but I will save a fortune on tiling 16x16 plates. Did anyone notice that the old Lego tree has reappeared?

Gravatar
By in Serbia,

There are some things that annoy me with this system. For example, there is no way to have a non-broken line in the middle of the road (no overtaking). However, since realistic larger roads will likely require two of these side-by side, I guess adding them won't be much of an issue.

Overall the biggest gripe will be - how to easily connect them to baseplates now that they are actually higher than a tiled baseplate. I'll have to rebuild all my modulars to raise them by one plate or more to match the height of the new road.

Gravatar
By in Netherlands,

@TeriXeri said:
"I don't mind the basic road pack, but the prices on some of the larger City sets look to be a bit overpriced overall in terms of getting them mainly for the roads.

Now I'm hoping LEGO will release some Xtra road signs, and more of those glow in the dark lanterns, after all they already had 40311 Traffic lights and 40312 Streetlamps the other years."


You could probably get the parts from Lego online bricks and pieces.

Gravatar
By in Russian Federation,

"I have positioned them differently to that shown on the box, to account for vehicles driving on the correct side of the road."
Uh huh. So that drivers can safely get to gas stations where they can buy donuts, cookies and bags of Lays chips.

Gravatar
By in Germany,

Would also love to see how the new (!) Speed Champions fit!

Gravatar
By in United States,

@CCC said:
"I think they look great but could have been improved. That zebra crossing, instead of having just the centre hole (why? Odd choice) remove all the stripes so it is completely customisable. It could be a plain road extension or crossing or tiled in a different way for drains or manhole covers and so on."

Was my first observation too. LEGO always seems to *just* miss the mark on having something great for customization and then they miss one spot like this. They'll probably come out with the one with all studs down the middle but sell it in a pack with like train flex track so you have to get a bunch of something you don't want to get one, but they'll have 2 painted ones in every pack of 1 larger plate so you end up with tons of ones you don't need.

Gravatar
By in United States,

It's too bad (tho physically impossible to engineer otherwise) that these are mutually exclusive with existing baseplates. My entire city is on traditional baseplates, from the modulars to the Creator 3-in-1s to the old Century Skyway and Central Precinct HQ. These would be a great road solution but would require re-engineering the entire thing - plus, I would lose some of the bespoke baseplates that subtly augment the set like the one in 6389 Fire Control Center.

The real question is do they keep the modulars backwards-compatible? These new plates won't work with them even as only a street scene due to the modulars' lower height resulting from the old baseplate.

Gravatar
By in United States,

@Spike730 said:
"I wonder what the 2022 modular building will use. I hope they keep the old baseplate."

I think that they are keeping the baseplates the same, but the roads are getting changed. So, I don't think you need to worry.

Gravatar
By in United Kingdom,

In my head I’ve long been thinking of this kind of system and along the lines of the old monorail track, but with some key differences to these new plates:
- as thick as a single plate plus baseplate
- the road would just have a single row of anti-studs along each edge, and recessed by the thickness of a normal baseplate
- this would enable them to overlap and work with existing baseplates (so quite a bit thinner than these new plates) and be the same height as, say, a modular building street
- they would be locked together with (2x4?) pieces of existing baseplate
- the surface would be textured, like real road (these are only shiny because of the need to match the inserted 2x4 tiles)
- sections could be used alongside one another to create 2, 4, 6 etc lane highways (though curves would be a problem due to differing radii
- could include ramp sections to build elevated roadways
- they could still be used for elevated roads, and they could have more anti-studs underneath for more creative supports than just along the edge

Thoughts?

Gravatar
By in United Kingdom,

Really excited for these to come out. Thanks for the review??

Gravatar
By in Argentina,

This is quite a bold change if you ask me, even if i've always wondered why were baseplates given an specific height, not matching anything else. The last time i remeber there was a change this big, was when I moved from electrified train tracks to the plastic ones. For this reason i think is naive to believe that Lego will keep both new and old system for much longer. I think there will be a bunch of pleople (like me) that will stick with the old system, basically cuz if you have a large layout it would be both impractical and expensive to redone it. As for new AFOLs, i see some highlights to the new system, as they seem, like the article says, more "modular". You can build bridges, avenues and even roofs with them. So, i see a lot of potential here.

Gravatar
By in Singapore,

But base plates aren’t out of system. They have a half-plate thickness, the same as brackets, so with a little bit of SNOT building, you could get a baseplate and regular plate to connect. I really don’t get the argument for baseplates being doomed to be retired because they’re not in-system. If so, would brackets also be on the way out? The new road plates just unnecessarily jacks up the price and raises the barrier of entry to starting a LEGO City. The only use I see for these are raised highways.

Then again, as I don’t build with baseplates anyway, I really shouldn’t be so fussed. I prefer to SNOT-build all my roads and road markings to guarantee full customisability and dexterity. I feel that LEGO is missing the point with these new “ultra customisable” road plates. If we wanted an “ultra customisable” road, we would just brick-build one, thank you. And hey, SNOT-roads allow for curves.

P.S: I’m surprised nobody has mentioned how ugly the gaps between the 2x4 tiles and the larger road plate piece are. So unsightly!

Gravatar
By in United States,

@M_Jibril:
Yeah, I like to sneak stuff like that in periodically.

@ambr:
What you you mean "reappeared"? Since the small pine tree first showed up in 1986, the only two years when it has failed to be included in a new set are 1994 and 2005. The large tree had an unbroken run from 1971 to 2013, and only missed 2014, 2016, 2019, and 2020. The deciduous tree has a lot more breaks, which might explain why I apparently don't own even one of those.

@Sammael:
The easiest way to raise Modulars up is to just shim them with baseplates. A baseplate stacked on top of another baseplate is roughly the same height as a baseplate with a layer of plates on top. The easiest way to build the new roads onto the old roads is to not actually do it at all. The tip of those ramps is probably very close to the thickness of the road surface of a baseplate. If you simply build right up to the edge without going over, it should look fine.

There are curved slopes that should allow you to match the slope of the sidewalks and roads to each other (stairs are another option). Build retaining walls to cover the edges of any blocks that sit higher than the surrounding sidewalks.

@yamaki:
I think bordering on "sprawl" is pretty accurate. These roads are 16-wide. The bodies of the new Speed Champions are 8-wide, so right there two of them will scrape each other driving in opposite directions. The fenders and sideview mirrors stick out even wider, so those will all get smashed up and knocked off when passing. But it's not as bad as the first "minifig-scale" Tumbler, which was 18-wide, meaning the rear wheels can drive on the sidewalks on both sides of the street simultaneously. And the flick-fire missiles add another two studs width, so keep those streetlights safely back from the curb!

Gravatar
By in United States,

I feel like people don't realize that these roads aren't just for 6/8 wide cars. Those 16x16 plates don't have any print lines on it, meaning that if you take one and put it next to another, you can place the road line between those two, making it a wider road and fitting for up to 16 wide vehicles.

Gravatar
By in United States,

@TheRightP_art said:
"But base plates aren’t out of system. They have a half-plate thickness, the same as brackets, so with a little bit of SNOT building, you could get a baseplate and regular plate to connect. I really don’t get the argument for baseplates being doomed to be retired because they’re not in-system. If so, would brackets also be on the way out? The new road plates just unnecessarily jacks up the price and raises the barrier of entry to starting a LEGO City. The only use I see for these are raised highways.

Then again, as I don’t build with baseplates anyway, I really shouldn’t be so fussed. I prefer to SNOT-build all my roads and road markings to guarantee full customisability and dexterity. I feel that LEGO is missing the point with these new “ultra customisable” road plates. If we wanted an “ultra customisable” road, we would just brick-build one, thank you. And hey, SNOT-roads allow for curves.

P.S: I’m surprised nobody has mentioned how ugly the gaps between the 2x4 tiles and the larger road plate piece are. So unsightly!"


I agree that baseplates don't HAVE to go away (and with the modular buildings continuing to use them I doubt they will).

But in one breath you complain that these jack up the price and barrier to entry for a Lego City, and in the next say that people who want customization should jump directly to even pricier and more technically demanding brick-built roads. It goes without saying that that can be a huge ask for any but the most dedicated hobbyist.

These, on the other hand, provide much greater potential for customization than the old road plates while being cheap and simple enough to use even for young builders. Yes, the cost may add up more for builders of giant layouts if they want to convert everything over, but almost no builders start out that way—they start with a small collection and build outward. And that's really not much more of a challenge with this new system than it was with the old road plates, which themselves were wildly inconsistent over the years and required a great deal of adaptation to work naturally with most other sets.

Gravatar
By in Australia,

I don't get the point of the 2x4 gaps in the middle of the road that have to be filled by a tile. Are there some customising options I'm missing here? The 1x4 gaps at the edges for connecting tiles I understand, I just don't get the big holes in the middle.

Gravatar
By in United States,

Nah. Not a fan of this. It is not compatible with the old system which is the biggest fail. People who already have a city with tons of the old plates are not gonna use this. I don't see how this could be effective used with the modular buildings as well. Also imo these are too thick and heavy and gonna be more expensive as well. If it's good why change. Not to mention this could be created with current existing pieces. I also see this as another greedy attempt by lego to make more money.

Gravatar
By in United Kingdom,

@CrimsonFury said:
"I don't get the point of the 2x4 gaps in the middle of the road that have to be filled by a tile. Are there some customising options I'm missing here? The 1x4 gaps at the edges for connecting tiles I understand, I just don't get the big holes in the middle. "

Take a look at this article for some ideas of what the holes in the middle may be useful for ;-) https://www.newelementary.com/2020/12/lego-city-review-mocs-60304-road-plates.html

Gravatar
By in Jordan,

I see that New Elementary suggested placing the Modular Buildings directly on top of plates and putting them next to the new road plates. I must say it looks surprisingly good like that, as it makes the sidewalk of the Modular a plate higher than the road.

Gravatar
By in Germany,

Three words:
HATE THIS SYSTEM

Gravatar
By in Australia,

I’m going to reserve final judgment on these until I see how they look in a larger town setting.

First impression though is that these are very ‘juniorised’, consistent with the upcoming city sets that they will initially come with. The scale seems slightly off, and the road lines are just terrible. I’m not sure some of these reviews are applying enough critical analysis here, presumably because the reviewers don’t want to upset Lego.

They also seem impossible to combine with existing road plates which have been around now for 40 odd years. In one move, Lego have made redundant many of the classic town builds that utilise modified road baseplates - early police stations, gas stations, houses etc. Annoying at best for people who love collecting these and don’t really want to incur the design pain of moving them somehow across to this system.

Still, the jury is out until these have been bedded in to some town layouts.

Gravatar
By in Canada,

@M_Jibril said:
"I see that New Elementary suggested placing the Modular Buildings directly on top of plates and putting them next to the new road plates. I must say it looks surprisingly good like that, as it makes the sidewalk of the Modular a plate higher than the road."

Agreed!

Honestly, that technique of setting the entire baseplate on top of a studded surface to bring it in line with plates was already widely known and popular among a lot of Town builders who had created or adopted custom road systems like MILS. There are forum discussions more than a decade old where AFOLs mention using this technique (for example: https://www.eurobricks.com/forum/index.php?/forums/topic/24855-techniques-to-build-a-tabletown/).

The biggest drawback to that approach is that the driveways of sets like Fire Brigade and Corner Garage are ALSO a plate higher than the road, but of course, the old road baseplates had the same issue. At least with these road plates, builders have a wider range of customization options to choose from if you DO prefer less of a bump for vehicles entering those driveways. @M_Jibril said:
"I see that New Elementary suggested placing the Modular Buildings directly on top of plates and putting them next to the new road plates. I must say it looks surprisingly good like that, as it makes the sidewalk of the Modular a plate higher than the road."

Agreed!

Honestly, that technique of setting the entire baseplate on top of a studded surface to bring it in line with plates was already widely known and popular among a lot of Town builders who had created or adopted custom road systems like MILS. There are forum discussions more than a decade old where AFOLs mention using this technique (for example: https://www.eurobricks.com/forum/index.php?/forums/topic/24855-techniques-to-build-a-tabletown/).

The biggest drawback to that approach is that the driveways of sets like Fire Brigade and Corner Garage are ALSO a plate higher than the road, but of course, the old road baseplates had the same issue. At least with these road plates, builders have a wider range of customization options to choose from if you DO prefer less of a bump for vehicles entering those driveways.

@CrimsonFury said:
"I don't get the point of the 2x4 gaps in the middle of the road that have to be filled by a tile. Are there some customising options I'm missing here? The 1x4 gaps at the edges for connecting tiles I understand, I just don't get the big holes in the middle. "

There are a lot of features you can add like median strips or traffic islands (as illustrated in the article that @benbacardi linked to), and some of the sets also show how these extra connection points can be used for applications other than roads, like a skate park or street hockey rink.

Also, by having the road stripes as a separate printed piece, the road markings themselves become much customizable. Currently, these sets only feature two dedicated options for this purpose (Dark Stone Gray 2x4 tiles with or without a white center stripe). But in the future, this could easily be expanded further with options like yellow center stripes, disabled or reserved parking space patterns, arrow patterns for turn lanes/exit lanes, or various text-based patterns ("STOP", "SLOW", "FIRE LANE", "BUS LANE", "NO ENTRY", "KEEP CLEAR", etc).

Gravatar
By in United States,

I feel it is OK to not have curved sections. A "T" is sufficient for the purpose of a curve. Also I think the curved baseplates are a waste of space. On the other hand....I have tons of baseplates and maybe I should sell them on eBay :)

Gravatar
By in Spain,

I think for me and all the old AFOLs the baseplates including the road baseplates are and will be essentials.

The new roads will be useful for elevated highways (also can be make with the 8x16 tile dark bluish gray and same little tiles white and DBG) the cost also will be very elevated.

For the oldest will always remain the used baseplates (BL, ebay, etc) and the 3rd party from Aliexpress, road and normal baseplates including more colors very useful for Heart Lake City

Gravatar
By in Canada,

I think I'll stock up. I've always wanted to make a display that looked better than just random cars and lorries sitting around on a shelf, this might be just what I need.

Gravatar
By in United Kingdom,

How about Cats-Eyes using grey jumper plates and transclear round tiles?

Gravatar
By in United States,

@lamby750:
I'd never heard of those, and had to look them up to determine that yes, they're similar to what I thought you were talking about. In the US, regions with little or no snowfall sometimes use a lane market called "Bott's Dots", which are raised bumps in the appropriate color (yellow or white). California is the only place I've encountered them, where they were mandated for public roads in areas with no snowfall. Now they're shifting away from exclusive use of them because self-driving cars have trouble seeing them. I don't know how Cat's Eyes manage to survive plowing in the winter, but Bott's Dots would pretty much be destroyed.

Near where I work, I recently saw how MDOT keeps the painted lines on roads from being peeled up with the first pass of a snowplow. They actually grind the surface of the road down about 1/8-1/4", and then paint in the recessed area. Not only does this roughen up the road surface so the paint will adhere better, but the painted lines actually sit low enough that there's no way a plow will hook the edge and rip them loose.

Gravatar
By in United States,

What is the ice cream truckish vehicle that is shown on the road plates?

Apologies for the slight threadjack, but I'm a new LEGO enthusiast and I'm trying to track down some interesting sets. Thanks in advance! :)

Gravatar
By in United States,

I can't wait to get my hands on some of these and incorporate tram tracks, bike lanes and parallel parking spots

Gravatar
By in United States,

These look like they’d integrate with parts like 6112762, of which I have several from Cars 3 sets and others. I think they’d also be easily arranged and rearranged in conjunction with sets like 60232 Garage Centre, which will make my kids happy.

Gravatar
By in United States,

@Daveismyhero said:
"What is the ice cream truckish vehicle that is shown on the road plates?

Apologies for the slight threadjack, but I'm a new LEGO enthusiast and I'm trying to track down some interesting sets. Thanks in advance! :)"


Looks like set 60253.

Gravatar
By in United States,

These are great! While the original base plates are good, these give some great options for building (even outside the intended road use). Four lanes with median, raised highway, parking lots, warehouse floors, ship decking, space craft hulls, and so much more

Gravatar
By in United States,

This kind of reminds me of the Mario sets. They look kinda nice, but yeah, way too small, expensive, not very compatible with base plates, less flexible use, raised... I don’t have a city, but if I did I’d be buying out road plates rn

Gravatar
By in Canada,

Might be I'm getting older. And that's the reason I do not like this new set. Maybe me opinion will change later.

From my point of view: LEGO has to make some sets together in a Bonus/Value Pack, e.g.:
60237: Curves & Crossroad OR 60236: Straight & T-Junction
AND
40311: Traffic Lights AND 40312: Streetlamps AND 40310: Botanical Accessories. It could be a good option for all to have road plates with useful accessories.

LEGO said goodbye the traditional 32x32 road baseplates in City sets, the last buildings - built on classic road baseplate - came out in 2011 and I do not know, why did LEGO give this up?
See: https://brickset.com/sets/tag-Road-Baseplate
I did a random search, I found there's no baseplates/road plates in the following sets: 60097: City Square, 60132: Service Station, 60154: Bus Station, 60200: Capital City, 60233: Donut Shop Opening sets.

And now LEGO builds sets on this new Road Plates.... wait, what?

BTW the streetlamp with 1x2 glow in the dark plate would be great to see in other sets in the future (e.g.: re-freshed streetlamps Xtra set).

Gravatar
By in United States,

@George_P_:
I suspect it's a combination of having to farm out the production of baseplates in general, and not being able to pack roadplates in any box smaller than 10"x10" internal dimensions.

Gravatar
By in Australia,

@ResIpsaLoquitur said:
"...I DON'T LIKE CHANGE."

I welcome change... as long as nothing is altered or different ;)

Gravatar
By in United States,

@tanyara:
I welcome change, as long as it's primarily quarters, and not a lot of pennies. Silver dollars would actually be pretty cool, because they're worth more than face value.

Gravatar
By in Germany,

As much as I like innovation, and the possibility to customize the road, e.g. the pedestrian crossing etc., I feel like this review does not address the negative aspects of the new system, especially when looking at existing clients of LEGO.

No compatibility with the old plates and modular buildings. I shouldn't have to find some weird workaround to level out the streets and the buildings

A steep price increase for less street coverage

This will make a lot of people look at cheaper alternatives. A competitor offers 4x the plates for half the price - without having to artificially adjust the height of my existing base plates.

I don't feel that this was a step in the right direction.

Return to home page »