Review: 21186 The Ice Castle
Posted by benbacardi,
Since 2013, LEGO has released nearly 100 Minecraft sets, and nine years on the theme is still going strong, with no fewer than 17 sets either released or due for release this year.
I've taken a look at one of the mid-sized sets: 21186 The Ice Castle; the first return to the frozen wastes of Minecraft since 21131 The Ice Spikes in 2017. At just under 500 pieces, it contains two exclusive minfigures, but is there anything else there of interest?
Summary
21186 The Ice Castle, 499 pieces.
£44.99 / $49.99 / €49.99 | 9.0p/10.0c/10.0c per piece.
Buy at LEGO.com »
A fairly unexciting set with little to entice other than the minifigures.
- Good selection of minifigures
- Not many play features
- Relatively expensive for basic bricks
The set was provided for review by LEGO. All opinions expressed are those of the author.
Minifigures
For a relatively small set, we actually get a fairly decent number of minifigures: six are included, starting with the Royal Warrior and a yeti, both of which are brand-new prints for head, torso, and legs. The yeti is all white, with dark blue hands and mostly light blue printing, and the Royal Warrior has a teal torso and legs, with gold arms.
The heads and legs have no printing on the reverse, but the blocky patterns from the front of the torso continue onto the rear.
The Royal Warrior is equipped with the standard Minecraft sword and a shield (a new print on a 2x3 tile), whereas the yeti wields a crossbow.
The remaining four minifigures come in pairs: two skeletons, both equipped with Minecraft bows (though only one shown below), and two zombies. One of the zombies is wearing a helmet and wielding an axe.
Although there is nothing particularly special about them—none have any printing on the rear, for example—it is nice to get two of each.
The Ice Castle
The build itself is quite quick, and in the usual Minecraft style uses a larger number of traditional LEGO bricks than most sets. There's a high quantity of 1x2 and 2x2 bricks, for example, but the aesthetic definitely matches that of the game!
The castle itself sits on a 16x16 plate in dark purple, which is new in this colour. In fact, the grass out the front (an 8x16 plate in sand green) and the water/ice to the side (a pair of 6x8 plates in medium blue) are also new in that colour.
The dominate feature of the castle are its two towers, standing guard at each of the front corners beside the entrance. Built primarily from white and medium blue bricks, the castle definitely looks like it's made of ice and snow. A pair of bare shrubs stand on the grassland out the front, and above the pillars either side of the entrance are a pair of flick-fire missiles for defence.
Inside, short ladders lead the way up to the crude battlements that run round three quarters of the castle, and up to the tops of the towers. The rear of the building is open.
In the corner is the traditional Minecraft crafting table (which has appeared in many sets before), as well as a bucket of water and what appears to be some kind of potion mixing contraption. Four 2x2 dark purple tiles printed with some kind of rug pattern lead the way in.
On the other side, an anvil sits next to a stone-cutting table, which uses the unusual technique of standing tiles vertically between the studs of a brick. I'm fairly sure this is something LEGO have only recently started being happy to include in official sets.
In the centre is a throne for the Royal Warrior, behind which hides a treasure chest containing a handful of trinkets.
Conclusion
For me, the appeal of this set is the quantity of minifigures. The Royal Warrior hasn't appeared before in a Minecraft set, but to get five additional minifigures as well immediately makes the set very playable. The castle itself is a relatively attractive model, but I'll admit that I'm not a fan of the Minecraft aesthetic and prefer the more detailed builds that modern LEGO parts are capable of.
Some previous Minecraft sets have had more interesting play features (such as exploding TNT bricks or mines revealing hidden diamonds), so it is a little disappointing to see that the only real interactive elements the set provides are the two flick-fire missiles above the door.
However, it's not particularly aimed at me: I am not a Minecraft player, and the sets look basic and rudimentary in my opinion. If you are into the game, perhaps they have more appeal! Let us know in the comments what you think.
The set will be available from the 1st of June for £44.99 / $49.99 / €49.99.
64 likes
27 comments on this article
I like this set
I have on my wanted list
As a very casual Minecraft player, I think the prices of the medium and large sets are really steep, although the US$10 sets are consistently really good value. Then again, this does seem better PPP than any of the Crafting Boxes, particularly 3.0 which also features a castle.
The dark purple 16x16 plate is not new; it was in a Trolls set and a previous-generation Friends set.
For some reason I thought that was an illegal technique. I know kids historically have done the plate between studs for decades but I don’t know that I have ever seen it in an official set.
As with the other Minecraft sets that our family owns, this will be a great parts pack once it's on sale.
I feel this set needs a trapdoor somewhere
For those who don't know, the Royal Warrior and the Yeti aren't actual characters in Minecraft. They just represent custom "skins" you can put on the player character/avatar, and they don't affect the game in any other way. (I don't know if the specific skins in this set are officially available to use, or if players would have to recreate them.) To my knowledge they aren't even the skins used by famous Minecraft YouTubers, or very popular skins lots of players like to use.
All that to say, these minifigures don't portray any character that Minecraft fans would know or want, so for those people they might not even add that much appeal to the set.
Still, I like that Lego is doing this rather than having Steve and/or Alex (the default skins included with the game) in every single set.
@ohrmazd said:
"For some reason I thought that was an illegal technique. I know kids historically have done the plate between studs for decades but I don’t know that I have ever seen it in an official set. "
IIRC, tiles are okay to use like that, but plates are not. Plates are very slightly larger and the vertical and horizontal studs interfere with each other.
The last time I remember seeing it used was 21309 for the flag tile on the lunar surface.
The star of this set are figures and BEAUTIFUL GLAZED TERRACOTA
As a Minecraft player, the "player-built structure" sets and custom skin minifigures don't really interest me, but this one isn't bad. Seems expensive for what it is, though.
Also, the square water container is a cauldron, the contraption to its right is a brewing stand, and the patterned tiles are glazed terracotta.
One of the most interesting and important points that needs to be called out is that the chest has a new lid, which makes the overall look much closer to what an in-game chest looks like!
I will be trying to get a ton of these through B&P, to replace all my current lids!
Minecraft sets are better parts packs than classic sets. You get lots of bricks in a limited color palette rather than 20 handfuls of bricks in different colors.
@ohrmazd said:
"For some reason I thought that was an illegal technique. I know kids historically have done the plate between studs for decades but I don’t know that I have ever seen it in an official set. "
That technique is ancient. The first set I owned that used it was 368
I always wonder what motivates Lego to keep producing a dozen of these sets every year, as hardly ever advertised anywhere, not great value, rarely seen in toyshops and given the fanbase is mainly kids don't they just buy the usual marketed Lego.
Funnily enough, just the other day I stared getting curious about my Minecraft collection. According to what I've catalogued here, I own 51 sets and am missing 40, and 17 of those 40 are from just this year! I gotta get collecting!
"what appears to be some kind of potion mixing contraption. Four 2x2 dark purple tiles printed with some kind of rug pattern lead the way in." "I am not a Minecraft player"
The first is quite obviously a Brewing Stand, while the later is less obviously Purple Glazed Terracotta. Y'all usually get Captain Rex to do the Star Wars reviews since he knows so much about them, and it makes them such fantastic reads! Would it kill you to get a Minecraft player to give some insight into the product? Its the best selling videogame of all time, one of your team has to have played it right?
I'm going to somewhat echo what @goldenguy880 said above. I'm kind of sick of completely custom skins in this thing. LEGO has only done 6 out of the 20 or so skins from Minecraft Dungeons. They've only done the basic Steve an Alex from the Legacy Console Default Skin Pack. They've done absolutely zero characters from Mojang official Skin Packs like Biome Settlers or Campfire Tales. Even popular Youtubers (as hard as that licensing would be) haven't been given a shot. There are so many interesting characters and monsters that are a part of the game's canon and/or history that LEGO keeps ignoring in favor of "generic concept but blocky 103."
Like, imagine if LEGO made 10 more variants of Jedi Bob named things like Jedi Sarah and Jedi Mike before they ever made a Kit Fisto minifig. How insulting would that be?
@ambr said:
"I always wonder what motivates Lego to keep producing a dozen of these sets every year, as hardly ever advertised anywhere, not great value, rarely seen in toyshops and given the fanbase is mainly kids don't they just buy the usual marketed Lego."
Bro. Lego minecraft is very popular. Kids love it and Its even has own magazine.
My inner 6 years old child would be so proud if he built this in 1986!
This set is cool but I do think the purple big plate, while looks good as is, but limits rebuilding the terrain a bit, if you want to build a different style castle.
That poor zombie went to all the trouble of bringing an axe and these players don't even have a door on their base.
@ambr said:
"I always wonder what motivates Lego to keep producing a dozen of these sets every year, as hardly ever advertised anywhere, not great value, rarely seen in toyshops and given the fanbase is mainly kids don't they just buy the usual marketed Lego."
They're rarely seen in toyshops because despite their high price tag, they're selling like hot cakes, and they can do this without relying on marketing because the video game is the marketing. Where I live, Minecraft sets might as well have a 6-month shelf life after which half of each wave permanently disappears from stores and never returns, effectively reaching premature EOL. As a result, there's a nasty scalper market here, with in-production sets being listed at or above MSRP, and retired sets being listed at such ridiculous markup it makes international shipping look good.
For example, I took great pains to source 21165 and 21166 recently because none of the major retailers or LEGO stores have had them in stock for months, and I'm currently on the lookout for a new 21140 which came out in 2018 — it'd cost about 1.5-2x its MSRP if I ship it from most places, versus paying the only seller 3x MSRP locally. Also its local MSRP is almost double its US MSRP after conversion...
Oddly I purchased my very first Minecraft set this year. It wasn’t released this year but I bought it this year. The Pig House. Wow…there were a ton of pink bricks. I just don’t get pink bricks often in anything I buy. And the set had BRICKS, y’all. Some sets I buy I’m hard pressed to find any traditional 2x4 bricks.
None of that’s relevant really, but I enjoyed putting it together. I’d probably get bored with a lot of the same doors and things over and over, and the minifigures weren’t as cool as others I like (I’ve played MC casually over the years). I did de use to try a couple more out…now that was a few weeks ago before a lot of the new sets with the new “inflation based PPP” has been getting established and also LEGO is getting ready to, I think, put out a numbing record amount of sets in cumulative RRP. So I need to pick and choose…still, it was a fun build.
This one looks to be in the same vein…using some techniques and stuff that make it more than stacking blocks. Oh and something else…lots of printed tiles. Love that.
@JudgeChuck said:
"One of the most interesting and important points that needs to be called out is that the chest has a new lid, which makes the overall look much closer to what an in-game chest looks like!
I will be trying to get a ton of these through B&P, to replace all my current lids!"
And they are stackable!
@JudgeChuck said:
"One of the most interesting and important points that needs to be called out is that the chest has a new lid, which makes the overall look much closer to what an in-game chest looks like!
I will be trying to get a ton of these through B&P, to replace all my current lids!"
The chest isn't even new for this Minecraft wave, it first appeared in LEGO Harry Potter with 76397: Hogwarts Moment: Defence Against the Dark Arts Class
I wondered, after seeing that new chest lid in 76399, how long it would take for it to show up in Minecraft sets.
I like Minecraft but the middle section seems fairly hollow. Maybe shrink the castle down a bit, removes half the minifigures and you could get a decent 30 dollar set.
@NatureBricks said:
"I'd say before this year Friends, NinjaGO and Minecraft were the best values in LEGO."
Until today, I have never seen anyone spell Ninjago the way you do
Also, I'd say City was decent.
@KoolKreeper489 said:
" @JudgeChuck said:
"One of the most interesting and important points that needs to be called out is that the chest has a new lid, which makes the overall look much closer to what an in-game chest looks like!
I will be trying to get a ton of these through B&P, to replace all my current lids!"
The chest isn't even new for this Minecraft wave, it first appeared in LEGO Harry Potter with 76397: Hogwarts Moment: Defence Against the Dark Arts Class"
I haven't been paying much attention to the HP releases, so I stand corrected, thanks! I'm very glad they have used the part for Minecraft though!
@NatureBricks said:
" @Torrent_Studios said:
" @NatureBricks said:
"I'd say before this year Friends, NinjaGO and Minecraft were the best values in LEGO."
Until today, I have never seen anyone spell Ninjago the way you do
Also, I'd say City was decent."
I thought it was spelled NinjaGo, NinjaGO was a typo, but LEGO just calls it NINJAGO.
City is famous for being the worst value of LEGO outside of Star Wars. "
NINJAGO, Ninjago and ninjago are all common spellings, "NinjaGo" is like what TV channels label it as for some reason.
I don't know, I always bought the small $10 City sets and I think they were great, but I've never really bought anything City above $20...