What's hot this week
Posted by Huwbot,
These are the sets that have been viewed the most this week:
TW | LW | Set | Views | |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 6376 Breezeway Café | 39351 | ||
2 | 71771 The Crystal King Temple | 24081 | ||
3 | 7327 Scorpion Pyramid | 5025 | ||
4 | 1 | ↓ | 40597 Scary Pirate Island | 3662 |
5 | 8 | ↑ | 75367 Venator-class Republic Attack Cruiser | 2299 |
6 | 3 | ↓ | 40608 Halloween Fun VIP Add-On Pack | 2205 |
7 | 60333 Bathtub Stunt Bike | 2113 | ||
8 | 1990 Octan F1 Race Car | 1873 | ||
9 | 6 | ↓ | 21317 Steamboat Willie | 1778 |
10 | 10243 Parisian Restaurant | 1692 |
The total number of set detail pages viewed this week is 1,249,485, which is 66,490 more than last week.
20 likes
11 comments on this article
I don't think I've ever seen that many views on a set.
@rople said:
"Does someone have any idea that why the top 3 sets are there, especially the 2 with so many views?"
Most times that the 7327 Scorpion Pyramid shows up on these lists, it's because there's a reddit post about raised baseplates where it's pointed out that this was the last set to include them. If you go look at the top posts of the week on r/Lego, I'm sure you'll find one about raised baseplates.
Not sure about the other two. If I had to guess, there was probably a reddit post about the tensegrity structure in the Ninjago set. No clue about Breezeway Cafe through.
I remember Breezeway Cafe from when I was a kid, that was a fun little set. A nice modern day medium-sized restaurant is 41379 Heartlake City Restaurant
surprized no said 60333 Bathtub Stunt Bike yet
@rople said:
"Does someone have any idea that why the top 3 sets are there, especially the 2 with so many views?"
1990 little to far back, has be reddit, some reason...
Always seems be reddit is reason.
@rople said:
"Does someone have any idea that why the top 3 sets are there, especially the 2 with so many views?"
71771 was from this Reddit post:
https://www.reddit.com/r/lego/comments/17ad5ay/on_a_scale_of_1_to_10_how_illegal_are_tensegrity/
6376 is also from Reddit, mentioning the technique used for the lights in the rightmost arch:
https://www.reddit.com/r/lego/comments/178ewk6/is_this_illegal/
@snaii: I've often wondered if that technique would be considered illegal today. Even its remake, 10037, is twenty years old.
What do people mean by legal/illegal in a LEGO context?
@Mr_Dunlop said:
"What do people mean by legal/illegal in a LEGO context?"
Check out Google or better yet youtube with that question, you'll get plenty of answers that wouldn't fit in a comment section here.
@thor96 said:
" @Mr_Dunlop said:
"What do people mean by legal/illegal in a LEGO context?"
Check out Google or better yet youtube with that question, you'll get plenty of answers that wouldn't fit in a comment section here."
On the contrary, it's quite easy to describe simply: A technique that does not provide a stable connection and/or places undue stress on the pieces.