Summer Harry Potter range official images!

Posted by ,
Triwizard Tournament: The Arrival

Triwizard Tournament: The Arrival

©2024 LEGO Group

Images of the new Harry Potter sets have been published by Lucky Bricks, including the long-awaited return of the Durmstrang ship in 76440 Triwizard Tournament: The Arrival!

Seven sets have been revealed and these will be available from the 1st of June. View them all below...


76427 Buckbeak

  • 723 pieces

76427-1


76431 Hogwarts Castle: Potions Class

  • 397 pieces
  • Professor Snape, Pansy Parkinson, Seamus Finnegan, Hermione Granger

76431-1


76433 Mandrake

  • 579 pieces

76433-1


76434 Aragog in the Forbidden Forest

  • 195 pieces
  • Harry Potter, Ron Weasley

76434-1


76435 Hogwarts Castle: The Great Hall

  • 1732 pieces
  • Mountain Troll, Professor Dumbledore, Professor Quirrell, Professor Vector, Harry Potter, Ron Weasley, Hermione Granger, Leanne, Daphne Greengrass, Terry Boot, Fat Friar

76435-1


76439 Ollivanders & Madam Malkin's Robes

  • 744 pieces
  • Padma Patil, Harry Potter, Wizard, Witch, Garrick Ollivander, Madam Malkin

76439-1


76440 Triwizard Tournament: The Arrival

  • 1229 pieces
  • Viktor Krum, Igor Karkaroff, Madame Maxime, Fleur Delacour, Barty Crouch Sr.

76440-1


What do you think of the summer Harry Potter range? Let us know in the comments.

79 comments on this article

Gravatar
By in United States,

Horrid.

Gravatar
By in Germany,

@japadberg said:
"Horrid."

Buckbeak, yes, the rest is fine.

Gravatar
By in United Kingdom,

I feel like the Mandrake would have been the perfect excuse to use the new sound brick again.

Gravatar
By in United Kingdom,

I like the new 'potion erupting out of cauldron' pieces and the larger bottles.

Gravatar
By in United States,

@jkb said:
" @japadberg said:
"Horrid."

Buckbeak, yes, the rest is fine."


Hmm... that's funny. I feel just the opposite.

I would rather they'd have spent the parts on the ship rather than including the carriage as it's redundant for many of us. Yet, that was some time ago, and this combination will certainly drive sales.

The stores look well-done, and the colors will certainly pop on my diagonally.

I love how the new troll was designed as an homage to the old version.

The Potions Class is clearly the best representation of fun magic-in-action that HP Lego has done.

Likewise, this Aragog is perhaps the nastiest, fiercest Lego spider yet! Can't wait to buy multiples.

The Mandrake is fun to look at. I was expecting not to like this. I was wrong.

Buckbeak... sorry, you're just a hot mess. Maybe, I'll see ya on the deep clearance, next to Uncanny Dobby.

Gravatar
By in United Kingdom,

Okay, so I'm really not a Harry Potter fan for various reasons... but I do really like that Mandrake.

I was skeptical after the Encanto one, but I'm starting to love that Lego is leaning into Themed Botanical sets.

Gravatar
By in United Kingdom,

So Pippin had a haircut and is now a Wizard?

Fool of a Took.

Gravatar
By in United States,

@jkb said:
" @japadberg said:
"Horrid."

Buckbeak, yes, the rest is fine."


I said horrid because I hate this theme.

Gravatar
By in Canada,

Why did Lego have to go and make such a realistic-looking spider, exactly? Like seriously, not even "nightmare fuel" can adequately describe the accuracy of that thing to IRL - such a major Upgrade from the 2018 version, but at the same time I hate it lol.

Gravatar
By in United Kingdom,

@japadberg said:
" @jkb said:
" @japadberg said:
"Horrid."

Buckbeak, yes, the rest is fine."


I said horrid because I hate this theme."


Then why even click on the article?
Also not every theme has to appeal to everyone.

Gravatar
By in United Kingdom,

@ELbricker said:
"Why did Lego have to go and make such a realistic-looking spider, exactly? Like seriously, not even "nightmare fuel" can adequately describe the accuracy of that thing to IRL - such a major Upgrade from the 2018 version, but at the same time I hate it lol."

Agree.
Reminds me of 9470,
Which I had to get to have all the LOTR (and have Sam)
But resides in the back dark corner of my shelf because it creeps me out too much.

Gravatar
By in United Kingdom,

The Great Hall seems way clunkier than the one from the last grey-roofed wave. That was nice, but this one looks very blocky, especially around the courtyard.

Gravatar
By in United Kingdom,

That Buckbeak is... not great.

Away, you silly creature!

Gravatar
By in Latvia,

I like Madame Malkin's hat. Is that a new piece?

Gravatar
By in France,

The Buckbeak looks very...derpy, for want of a better word. Surprised at how good the Durmstrang ship looks, and the Beauxbatons carriage is better looking than the last one, but probably not as good a toy and I feel bigger rear wheels would have improved the look. The potions class reminds me of the original from 2001, but those Fabuland cauldrons are sorely missed.

Gravatar
By in Australia,

That's about the fourth Aragon, and hey, the scenery there attaches to the Forbidden Forest set (and the polybag) that came out earlier in the year.

I kinda like the continuity there.

Gravatar
By in Denmark,

I think the ship is great. I could see myself buy that!

Gravatar
By in United Kingdom,

The Mandrake looks fun.

Gravatar
By in Netherlands,

76440 examplifies one issue I have with Lego nowadays: Combining things could just as well (or better?) be separate sets into one big, expensive set that as a whole feels less than the sum of its parts.

I think the ship looks pretty great, and the carriage is not bad either. But it feels weird that both come with just two figures each. Wasn't part of the arrival them entering the Great Hall as a group?

Gravatar
By in United States,

Is the potions class modular? If not why?

Otherwise everything looks great, except buckbeak

Gravatar
By in Australia,

I'm not a Harry Potter fan, but the ship in 76440 is seriously tempting. It looks glorious!
...Hopefully I'll be able to find it on sale for a reasonable price.

Gravatar
By in United States,

I wonder with the grey roof modulars, if everything is going to have a certain spot, the boat house
Certainly has its spot.

Gravatar
By in United Kingdom,

@japadberg said:
"Horrid."

It’s spelt “Hagrid” and he’s not even in these sets

Gravatar
By in United States,

Practically the same fleur, whatever, but Maxine has toy story legs?

Gravatar
By in United States,

So much amazing stuff here... where do I even begin?

Gravatar
By in United States,

Looks like Ron is going to be spiders. He just is.

Gravatar
By in United States,

Some good stuff there that I will happily buy in @japadberg 's honor. :p

Gravatar
By in United States,

Contrary to popular opinion, I think Buckbeak actually looks nice. Sure, the eyes are too far forward... and the legs are too thin... and the body is too blocky...

OK, I take that back. Buckbeak looks awful.

Gravatar
By in Switzerland,

Spider and Ship look great. And while the Great Hall is slowly becoming Harry Potter's Landspeeder, I like the direction taken here. You can clearly clip on the Boathouse and they will surely be making a more detailed tower with Dumbeldore's office next. Noice.

The Potion Class looks cute, but I am wondering how it will fit in the castle. Can it slide in below the Hall, as suggested in the promo pics of that set?

Gravatar
By in United Kingdom,

I'm a sucker for ships and 76440 is a lovely looking set.

Gravatar
By in Poland,

The fact the Troll attack is not set alone is stupid. Lego would make WAY MORE money, as people would buy multiple of these.
However 76431 is amazing. So many great pieces for any castle moc!
Its also REALLY weird how they made Carriage and Ship one set. Once again they would sell WAY MORE alone.

Gravatar
By in Poland,

Also Olivander set has bunch of new WANDS.

Gravatar
By in United Kingdom,

@Andrusi said:
"Looks like Ron is going to be spiders. He just is."

Ron's Ron shirt is just as bad as Ron himself.

Gravatar
By in United States,

Bit surprised that 76427 and 76433 don't include minifigures.

@Jackthenipper said:
" @japadberg said:
"Horrid."

It’s spelt “Hagrid” and he’s not even in these sets"


I had the same thought.

Gravatar
By in Australia,

Best Aragog ever released IMO, and Buckbeak looks great. Everything else is of no interest to me though.

Gravatar
By in Philippines,

@mediAFOL said:
"The Great Hall seems way clunkier than the one from the last grey-roofed wave. That was nice, but this one looks very blocky, especially around the courtyard."

I agree. Despite getting a better scale than previous versions (2018 was too wide and too short, 2021 was too cramped and inaccurate), there’s something off about it… I do like that they included the courtyard and that it’s situated atop mountainous terrain but I felt the overall design was a step backward. Too blocky indeed.

Oh, and I expected more from that night sky illusion when I first read reports about it. I was hoping they would use lenticular cards / the ones they used for the Hogwarts banners series. Such a wasted potential.

Gravatar
By in United States,

76440 Triwizard Tournament: The Arrival
76433 Mandrake

For once goes with ships example pirates (not pirates theme ships..)
botanical sets...

Now if they could just do rest thay way.... multiple catagories sets...

Gravatar
By in Canada,

Guess I am in the minority that I like Buckbeak. Will wait to see it in person.

I do agree that most of these would work better as multiple sets. The Durmstrang ship especially suffers from lack of parts.

Gravatar
By in Hungary,

@japadberg said:
" @jkb said:
" @japadberg said:
"Horrid."

Buckbeak, yes, the rest is fine."


I said horrid because I hate this theme."


Then don't buy the sets. But there's no point in trying to ruin the fun for those who do like them.

Gravatar
By in Sweden,

The scale of the great hall is messing with my head. The courtyard looks absolutely tiny. The minifigures look like giants compared to the whole building.

Gravatar
By in Puerto Rico,

That's a better Aragog than last time.

Gravatar
By in United States,

As an adult collector, it annoys me that they're already doing another Hogwarts and Aragog set.
But as for my inner child, I remember how devastated I was if sets went out of production before I could get them.
It also helps that this is the best playscale model of Hogwarts so far (in my opinion).

Gravatar
By in Sweden,

Not sure how I feel about the Great Hall being elevated. You end up paying A LOT of money for rocks, and if this year's sets are to mark the start of a new "modular" Hogwarts, this implies that every single set going forward will similarly have to be raised up to match this, which is going to make all those sets way more expensive than otherwise.

The troll in the bathroom deserved to be its own set, not a tiny little side-module. It'd be the perfect set for something similar to the Potion Class set, just a bit of wall with bathroom details, a troll, and then Harry, Ron and Hermione figures.

Aragog is fantastic but it's a bit of a shame that there's so little forest included. You kinda need to get 76432 if you want to have a nice little display piece to go with it. But at least both sets are fairly affordable.

Gravatar
By in United States,

That ship looks spectacular! The only knock on that set is the lack of a couple more minifigs

Gravatar
By in United States,

Durmstrang ship looks great.

Gravatar
By in United States,

@AcePilotHarryKane said:
"The scale of the great hall is messing with my head. The courtyard looks absolutely tiny. The minifigures look like giants compared to the whole building. "

It looks like the hall itself is taller than the one in either 76389 or 75954. Unfortunately, it looks like it's narrower than either one as well.

I'd love to know what, if any, plan there is for how the new Hogwarts sets fit together. I finally arrived at a pretty solid arrangement of all the 2021-2023 sets and was thinking of trying to combine them with the 2018-2019 sets as a summer project with the kids.

Gravatar
By in Germany,

@Graysmith said:
"Not sure how I feel about the Great Hall being elevated. You end up paying A LOT of money for rocks, and if this year's sets are to mark the start of a new "modular" Hogwarts, this implies that every single set going forward will similarly have to be raised up to match this, which is going to make all those sets way more expensive than otherwise."

This. When first heard about the piece count rumors, I expected a definitive version of the central wing of Hogwarts. However, when comparing it to the 2018 version, it is evident a lot of pieces actually went into the basement compartments/rocks. Consequently, it does not really feel like a real upgrade imo with the scale and details being hardly better than in previous iterations.

Gravatar
By in Canada,

I'm not quite sure about the wheelchair in the Wizarding World. I'm all for inclusion in the real world but remember, magical people can regrow bones in a matter of a few days. I do not recall having seen anyone (non-muggle) in the Potter movies in a wheelchair (I may be wrong). I know I will most likely take some flak for this - but I like my things to be as accurate as possible.

Other than that, very nice sets. 2024 will be very expensive

Gravatar
By in Germany,

@HOBBES said:
"I'm not quite sure about the wheelchair in the Wizarding World. I'm all for inclusion in the real world but remember, magical people can regrow bones in a matter of a few days. I do not recall having seen anyone (non-muggle) in the Potter movies in a wheelchair (I may be wrong). I know I will most likely take some flak for this - but I like my things to be as accurate as possible.

Other than that, very nice sets. 2024 will be very expensive"


What about curses that can't be healed? The world hasn't been fully fleshed out anyway.

Gravatar
By in United States,

Say Brick Built Buckbeak five times fast.

Gravatar
By in United States,

The Great Hall looks incomplete without the tower next to it. Definitely a downgrade from 2018 imo despite the big jump in piece count. And although it is nice to see the inclusion of some characters we haven't gotten before, the lineup doesn't look quite as good as that from the past two great hall sets. The 2021 great hall was also elevated and I think everyone would agree the chamber was a much better inclusion than the troll/hufflepuff common room. The troll bigfig is great and really the only thing it has going for it but the troll in the bathroom probably could have been its own set. This feels like you need to get more add ons to really make it work, it doesn't work quite that well as a stand alone

Gravatar
By in United States,

@The_ghost said:
"Is the potions class modular? If not why?

Otherwise everything looks great, except buckbeak"


1: Yes, it can be folded up and fit into the spaces under the Great Hall.

2: Agreed.

Gravatar
By in United States,

That ship makes a perfect late-medieval/early-Renaissance carrack for the Lion Knights.

Gravatar
By in United States,

OH! The Great Hall is made to connect to the Boathouse. I wonder how far they will get in creating a new modular layout before messing it up like they always do. It will look cool with the Durmstrang Ship and Beauxbatons Carriage with it.

And why only one set of Diagon Alley shops? These are obviously made to go with the new smaller version of Weasleys' Wizard Wheezes, but can't they make a few sets at a time? Especially, if they are supposed to be the cheaper playset versions.

LEGO really needs an HP Fan to guide the line...

Gravatar
By in Philippines,

@Graysmith said:
"Not sure how I feel about the Great Hall being elevated. You end up paying A LOT of money for rocks, and if this year's sets are to mark the start of a new "modular" Hogwarts, this implies that every single set going forward will similarly have to be raised up to match this, which is going to make all those sets way more expensive than otherwise.

The troll in the bathroom deserved to be its own set, not a tiny little side-module. It'd be the perfect set for something similar to the Potion Class set, just a bit of wall with bathroom details, a troll, and then Harry, Ron and Hermione figures.

Aragog is fantastic but it's a bit of a shame that there's so little forest included. You kinda need to get 76432 if you want to have a nice little display piece to go with it. But at least both sets are fairly affordable."


This has been my issue with sets being mostly brick-built. I think they missed another opportunity to use BURPs (“big ugly rock pieces”) for raising the Hogwarts sets. This might be an unpopular opinion but for me, using such big elements on sets that require rocky features is probably the best approach to designing them aesthetics-wise. Not only will collectors save time from building endless rock structures that aren’t really adding value to a set’s displayability, it will also help create a “cleaner”, more uniform look. The micro scale Hogwarts Castle from 2018 was a perfect example of that.

Gravatar
By in Belgium,

Yuckbeak.

Gravatar
By in United States,

Brick-built Buckbeak breaks my brain...

I love that rendition of Olivander's, though. I haven't followed closely, but have we ever had a bowler hat before? Love Barty's hat, makes me want to make a pair of Laurel & Hardy figs which should be pretty easy.

Gravatar
By in United States,

These look pretty quality as expected. It's one of the themes that has consistently good designers.

The Buckbeak actually doesn't look too bad. I think it looks silly in the pose like it is showing off some new shoes or something. But I'll end up getting it.

The rest look solid. I love the new figures. I know there is a ton of ideas for future sets, but getting some repeats can be okay. I hate that we are getting a new Ollivander's since the other one was in the massively expensive set. (I mean that's good for other fans, but I hate having to get multiple of the same building, like WWW).

I keep wanting to build my own big Hogwarts, I know it isn't anything new or inventive. But since they keep releasing details I would include, now I wonder if I should even bother. People will think it's just a set. It isn't like back 10 years ago when it wasn't on the market so seeing HP related MOCs was impressive. Now everyone is doing it.

Gravatar
By in Canada,

76440's boat is very nice, but it sucks that they bundled it with the carriage. Should've split that to two sets. If you only want one, you're paying more for nothing.

Gravatar
By in United States,

@japadberg said:
" @jkb said:
" @japadberg said:
"Horrid."

Buckbeak, yes, the rest is fine."


I said horrid because I hate this theme."

I think these sets look amazing and it makes me furious because I hate this theme. Why can’t we get these cool, affordable location and creature builds in Star Wars? All we get are too many Landspeeders or vehicles that appear once in one of the new Disney+ shows and never again.

Gravatar
By in United States,

@yellowcastle said:
" @Gustoffr2d2 said:
"LEGO really needs an HP Fan to guide the line..."

If only we had a Harry Potter version of @StyleCounselor here…"


I think they're doing a pretty good job. Revisiting the classics, introducing new characters, design, etc.

Of course, things could be more planned. They have jumped from modular to dollhouse, and back.

Nevertheless, a shifting jumble is what Hogwarts is supposed to be, and it does all look good together. I even have the old paper roof sets in my layout.

Not like Lego SW where they expect you to pay more and more for less an less. Pencil kamas. No capes! Oooh! It's makes me sooo mad!

Aaargh, yellowcastle, got me again!!

Gravatar
By in United Kingdom,

@brickwich said:
"As an adult collector, it annoys me that they're already doing another Hogwarts and Aragog set.
But as for my inner child, I remember how devastated I was if sets went out of production before I could get them.
It also helps that this is the best playscale model of Hogwarts so far (in my opinion)."


I mean, the last Aragog set was 6 years ago :)

Gravatar
By in United States,

It's insane to see the best Hogwarts sets ever this long into the theme! We've gotten some pretty great sets in the past but this new system is something else. That Great Hall is absolutely incredible. The rest of the sets look fantastic but Buckbeak definitely looks off. Why are his wings so small?

Gravatar
By in United States,

Expensive.

I'd have preferred having two sets rather than one for the arrival of the Triwizard Cup contestants, and I don't like the brick-built Buckbeak, but everything else looks good. Keeping to any sort of a budget is not going to be easy this year, I can tell already....

Gravatar
By in United States,

It looks like we're getting the greatest version of minifigure-scale Hogwarts yet.

The pictures on lego.com show that the potions class can fold up and go where the bathroom or hufflepuff common room goes under the great hall. Really incredible ingenuity to be able to fit dungeon rooms in the dungeons but also have them be accessible and playable.

So it looks like there will be more dungeon modules and hopefully some empty dungeon spaces for the potion classroom and the other modules sold as sets

Gravatar
By in Switzerland,

@ha21 said:
"It looks like we're getting the greatest version of minifigure-scale Hogwarts yet.

The pictures on lego.com show that the potions class can fold up and go where the bathroom or hufflepuff common room goes under the great hall. Really incredible ingenuity to be able to fit dungeon rooms in the dungeons but also have them be accessible and playable.

So it looks like there will be more dungeon modules and hopefully some empty dungeon spaces for the potion classroom and the other modules sold as sets"


That's awesome. You just confirmed what I was curious about. So you can fold up the potions class, and prob other sets in the future, and fit them in the Dungeons. Great Idea!

Gravatar
By in United States,

One of the better LEGO Harry Potter lineups from recent years

Gravatar
By in United Kingdom,

@ra226 said:
"Brick-built Buckbeak breaks my brain...

I love that rendition of Olivander's, though. I haven't followed closely, but have we ever had a bowler hat before? Love Barty's hat, makes me want to make a pair of Laurel & Hardy figs which should be pretty easy."


The bowler hat has been around since 2012.

Gravatar
By in Philippines,

We’re getting one of the Hobbits’ torsos through that Ollivander’s set. :)

I was hoping to get more of those unique wand boxes but there’s only one included unfortunately. Still, that wand shop and Madame Malkin’ s store look the finest of the current releases along with the Triwizard arrival.

Gravatar
By in Canada,

Gosh dang it, I actually want a Harry Potter set. The Durmstrang ship, while not exactly the best looking ship I have ever seen, is a boat. With some sails. Some VERY nice sails, that remind me of a Spanish galleon model my dad made. I want those sails.

Gravatar
By in United Kingdom,

From my witch unrelated HP side, I like the mandrake. Magical and or poisonous plants would be a good follow up to 10329-1 in the botanical theme.

Gravatar
By in Australia,

That ship is fantastic.

Gravatar
By in United States,

Those are some interesting wand pieces outside Kilgarrah’s wand shop!

Gravatar
By in United States,

76439 to me seems to be the absolute standout of this wave. Both storefronts are wonderfully detailed and have nice color palettes, and look especially nice in contrast to one another.

76435 is also interesting, but something about it just feels a little off. I think the front of the great hall (the courtyard area?) just feels a little too boxy for some reason. The base also feels just a little too flush; the bottom part seems like it should be jutting out just a little more. I'm guessing they're going to have more Hogwarts castle sets you can combine with this one to make a full castle? They've done that in the past, and it would be amazing to see that done on a bigger scale. Despite my complaints, all the details around the back seem wonderful.

76440 is also a set we've needed for a long time, and it looks really good imo. The brick-built cup deserves special attention.

Gravatar
By in Germany,

I like a lot of what I see, but the proportions on the Great Hall set somehow look off to me. Can't really pin it down on any detail in particular, but the final look just doesn't do it for me. Thankfully I have two of the earlier versions and I'm very happy with those.

Gravatar
By in United States,

Just enough time to get the funds in order!

Return to home page »