What's hot this week
Posted by Huwbot,
These are the sets that have been viewed the most this week:
| TW | LW | Set | Views | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 41838 Travel Moments | 3905 | ||
| 2 | 42172 McLaren P1 | 3702 | ||
| 3 | 8061 Gateway of the Squid | 3611 | ||
| 4 | 42177 Mercedes-Benz G 500 PROFESSIONAL Line | 2451 | ||
| 5 | 1 | ↓ | 21350 JAWS | 1660 |
| 6 | 910030 Snack Shack | 1510 | ||
| 7 | 7000 Baby Ankylosaurus | 1344 | ||
| 8 | 27 | ↑ | 75387 Boarding the Tantive IV | 1340 |
| 9 | 6281 Pirates Perilous Pitfall | 1306 | ||
| 10 | 10273 Haunted House | 1276 |
The total number of set detail pages viewed this week is 1,101,441, which is 26,066 more than last week.
19 likes
12 comments on this article
Why hasn’t a reveal article been made on 41838?
And 8061 is back again
@watcher21 said:
"And 8061 is back again"
Probably will keep popping up every now and then until 31139 retires.
Not a fan of the latest Ankylosaurus as it looks crap. But after seeing 7000, it’s an absolute masterpiece
@Maxbricks14 said:
"Why hasn’t a reveal article been made on 41838?"
Because LEGO hasn't revealed it yet?
@watcher21 said:
"And 8061 is back again"
Creatures with eight legs can hold onto something for a long time, if they want to.
@Glacier_Phoenix said:
" @Maxbricks14 said:
"Why hasn’t a reveal article been made on 41838?"
Because LEGO hasn't revealed it yet? "
But it’s got an image and it’s on Lego.com too.
@Binary_Code said:
" @watcher21 said:
"And 8061 is back again"
Probably will keep popping up every now and then until 31139 retires."
On Reddit I saw a post in r/Lego about someone asking what that mini build was. I thought everyone knew what it was?
Maybe it’s only here on Brickset.
@Reventon said:
"Not a fan of the latest Ankylosaurus as it looks crap. But after seeing 7000, it’s an absolute masterpiece "
You mean that because of it’s sand green parts don’t you?
Don’t you!?
@Maxbricks14 said:
" @Glacier_Phoenix said:
" @Maxbricks14 said:
"Why hasn’t a reveal article been made on 41838?"
Because LEGO hasn't revealed it yet? "
But it’s got an image and it’s on Lego.com too."
Not every single set gets an official reveal, especially not if they' big, expensive sets and/or part of an ongoing theme. 40161 , 40174 , and 40198 , for instance, didn't. I only have those three because I happened to find them on Lego.com.
@TheOtherMike said:
" @Maxbricks14 said:
" @Glacier_Phoenix said:
" @Maxbricks14 said:
"Why hasn’t a reveal article been made on 41838?"
Because LEGO hasn't revealed it yet? "
But it’s got an image and it’s on Lego.com too."
Not every single set gets an official reveal, especially not if they' big, expensive sets and/or part of an ongoing theme. 40161 , 40174 , and 40198 , for instance, didn't. I only have those three because I happened to find them on Lego.com."
But this one in particular is quite a major set, and you’d think Lego would want to showcase it?
@Maxbricks14 said:
" @TheOtherMike said:
" @Maxbricks14 said:
" @Glacier_Phoenix said:
" @Maxbricks14 said:
"Why hasn’t a reveal article been made on 41838?"
Because LEGO hasn't revealed it yet? "
But it’s got an image and it’s on Lego.com too."
Not every single set gets an official reveal, especially not if they' big, expensive sets and/or part of an ongoing theme. 40161 , 40174 , and 40198 , for instance, didn't. I only have those three because I happened to find them on Lego.com."
But this one in particular is quite a major set, and you’d think Lego would want to showcase it?"
The set doesn't even have a piece count listed here yet, And a search for it on Lego.com isn't coming up with anything for me, either by name or set number, so maybe there's still a forthcoming reveal. @Maxbricks14, are you still able to see it on Lego.com?