1st photo for 76349 has blue arms for Spidey, very weird!

I like the Spider-Man figs with the arm printing. Very nice.

Marvel is on a roll this year, we finally get arm printed Spiderman with dual molded legs at the same time!

Other than that the sets themselves are okay, like I'm not really sure who the target audience for the portable figure is. And on a side note why is the dude mogging us in one of the real life images? The gray building looks like it barely survived a bombing, and it's interior seems non-existent if Lego is not even providing a picture of it. The truck is the only fun looking one of the three.

The Spider-Man Hero figure is really cool.

They should've skipped tarantula in the building set and made spiderman the only repeat.

A chonky 6-wheeled tank-like vehicle? I’m in.

I believe the building is supposed to be an empty building being renovated but why did they decide for that? It looks so bland and boring.

Love the Hot Dog cart.

Fun fact: Boomerang has been one of Peter Parker's roommates. He was an objectively bad roomie, but he was also objectively awesome at "Call of Duty: Latveria".

I like Boomerang. These days he's mostly low-life comic relief, but he's a surprisingly loyal friend to Spider-Man (when he's not trying to kill him).

76346 isn't at all what I'm looking for, but it looks a lot better than I expected.

Isn't that Vehicle A Tan colour in that trailer?
Why have Lego done it in dark blue?

Also Where's the Punisher?

…okay, I do kind of like the big chunky van. Always appreciate a tank that actually has a bit of heft to it

All three are very good.
Nice buildable action figures for the kids (parents you can find much cheaper obviously Spiderman figures for you kids to play with that are good quality too).
Good lookin' chunky tank/truck.
And city apartment building to knock down with cool figures all around.
Good stuff.
Parents just wait for that 20% Amazon to bring it to a fairer price.

Well, I'm not surprised that 'other' Marvel hero from the latest trailers isn't in any of these, but I do really want one of him...

I like the prisoner transport too.

I bet the hulk set has some major inaccuracies in it too. But I don't mind, I'd never be buying it anyway

The chonky tanky van thing is pretty cool. If I see it on a deep enough discount, maybe.

The buildable figure looks okay apart from the head (and it only looks passable in one of the shots), but where they got that price from I've no idea.

The other sets don't look that appealing to me but the tanky thing is kinda cool.

Tarantula being a repeat fig is so weird, surely he’s not that important to the movie and could have easily been some other character.

@ACubeInABox said:
"I can't believe we finally got soviet bloc apartment: the LEGO set. A bit odd that it comes through the Marvel line instead of the Icons line, but I can overlook that.

Also, the hot dog vendor on the back of the box is breaking LEGO physics, I wonder what's up with that lol"

If you're referring to her hand, the wall piece she is holding is the concave portion of a panel so it actually works.

@BLProductions said:
"Bland, boring, overpriced, Marvel is dead, etc. etc.

That Spiderman figure 76346 has too much poseability for a LEGO set... waiting for the lawsuit from Hasbro or whoever has the action figure license."
Have you seen the average post 2024 big Ninjago Mech? If they haven’t got a lawsuit from the action figure thing they never will.

@LuccaTalksYT said:
" @BLProductions said:
"Bland, boring, overpriced, Marvel is dead, etc. etc.

That Spiderman figure 76346 has too much poseability for a LEGO set... waiting for the lawsuit from Hasbro or whoever has the action figure license."
Have you seen the average post 2024 big Ninjago Mech? If they haven’t got a lawsuit from the action figure thing they never will. "
Ninjago mechs are mechanical suits designed to interact with characters from LEGO's own IP; they are not the characters themselves. They also, historically, tend to be missing at least one key joint that hinders poseability. This Spiderman thing is, in essence, a buildable action figure: it has all the useful joints and is a depiction of a third-party licensed character, a license I believe Hasbro holds for action figures (though that may be just Star Wars at this point). Note how LEGO has carefully called it a "Hero" figure. That said, I wasn't being all that serious - LEGO has made numerous action-figure-adjacent sets in the past (see the SW buildable figures, for example).

In other words, what @PurpleDave said.

On one hand, want to get my hands on that building just because of it's functionality, but I might wait until it's on sale. Turn that $90 into a $60 or $70, then we can talk.

I assume “TAS 134” on the DODC vehicle refers to The Amazing Spider-Man issue 134. What’s so special about that issue?

Push the axle from behind to pop the walls off, or observe quantum tunneling at a macro scale!

I think the exploding building set is more a minifig pack than an actual set. If you think that way, it’s probably better to purchase on a discount. I’m glad that all the main characters here are nicely detailed with leg prints. Spider-Man has a new torso but I still have those better ones with leg prints from 10 years ago for comparison. The contents of this wave may not reflect the actual story of the film, so maybe there will be better sets next year, if the movie pulls in huge numbers at the worldwide box office.

@PDelahanty said:
"I assume “TAS 134” on the DODC vehicle refers to The Amazing Spider-Man issue 134. What’s so special about that issue?"

The first appearance of Tarantula!

I'm sorry, but I feel like they aren't even trying with these Marvel sets.

I just learnt today that there are two different supervillains named Tarantula, with the other one from DC and appeared in the Lego Batman Movie sets.

@Pekingduckman said:
"I just learnt today that there are two different supervillains named Tarantula, with the other one from DC and appeared in the Lego Batman Movie sets."
And there is also the Black Tarantula. That’s a different Spider-man villain/character

@Pekingduckman: Yes...but no, DC's Tarantula was a hero, as of the 'Golden-Age' version. The modern one is villain (or rather, villainess).

@legoavenger14: Punisher...is complicated...I'm guessing it has do w/these set not being '18+'.

Does the Prison Transport give anyone else Insomniac Spider-Man vibes? Weren’t those exact vehicles a set piece at the start of Spider-Man: Miles Morales?

Interested when it's discounted. The truck would pair nicely with the Space Marine collectable minifig

@CapnRex101 said:
" @PurpleDave said:
"This is in reference to the dusty old myth that Hasbro complained about a series of minifig 3-packs stepping on their rights as the action figure license holder, and forced TLG to stop making minifig-only sets."

What makes you say that is a myth?"

We’ve been over this at least one time before. Firstly, because I remember reading an interview where a set designer debunked it. Secondly, because they still kept making polybag minifigs, and while these have mostly been some form of giveaway (May 4th GWPs, magazine gifts, etc.), a few have been available for direct purchase (specifically, I remember piles of 5002938 being pegged at TRU, with no associated giveaway).

We also know that, going back at least 15 years to 7959, they figured out that minifigs sell sets. People complain about minifigs being paywalled behind expensive sets all the time, and again if those same minifigs later wind up in inexpensive sets (as recently happened with a certain Captain Rex minifig), but it’s always Hasbro that gets the blame. Unfortunately, I can’t remember where I read that interview (nor when we last discussed this), but you’ve got inside contacts who you could ask, don’t you?

@PDelahanty said:
"I assume “TAS 134” on the DODC vehicle refers to The Amazing Spider-Man issue 134. What’s so special about that issue?"

It’s when Tarantula, the prisoner in the vehicle, first appears. One of the trailers for the film has a slow-mo shot deliberately homaging its cover:
https://marvel.fandom.com/wiki/Amazing_Spider-Man_Vol_1_134

"Spider-Man, Hulk, Boomerang, Tarantula, Scorpion, Hotdog Vendor"
The last one has the coolest superhero name ever!

@behemothjosh said:
"If you ever try to build a city with only marvel sets, there will be more spidermans than non-super citizens."

The same could be said for Harry Potter sets.

@Yooha said:
""Spider-Man, Hulk, Boomerang, Tarantula, Scorpion, Hotdog Vendor"
The last one has the coolest superhero name ever!"

I dunno, it’s pretty hard to beat Teenage Negasonic Warhead. Unless it’s in an actual fight. Apparently the print version went down like a sack of grain her first time in combat, which is why Fox had to work a deal with Disney (mod TNW’s power set in exchange for being allowed to use Ego in GotG2) so they could make her as powerful as her name suggests in the first Deadpool film.

@PurpleDave said:
" @Yooha said:
""Spider-Man, Hulk, Boomerang, Tarantula, Scorpion, Hotdog Vendor"
The last one has the coolest superhero name ever!"

I dunno, it’s pretty hard to beat Teenage Negasonic Warhead. Unless it’s in an actual fight. Apparently the print version went down like a sack of grain her first time in combat, which is why Fox had to work a deal with Disney (mod TNW’s power set in exchange for being allowed to use Ego in GotG2) so they could make her as powerful as her name suggests in the first Deadpool film."

For some reason I had thought the deal was for the Skrulls, not Ego, but the timeline of that wouldn't make sense. Still, I'm not sure why Fox would have gotten Ego, when he's been in more Thor comics than Fantastic Four ones.

@Crux said:
" @ToysFromTheAttic said:
" @behemothjosh said:
"If you ever try to build a city with only marvel sets, there will be more spidermans than non-super citizens."

The same could be said for Harry Potter sets. "

I disagree. There are very few spider-people in the Harry Potter franchise."

What, Aragog's not people?

The APC looks cool, the building is something that can be used as an abandoned section.

@RogueWhistler said:
" @PurpleDave said:
" @Yooha said:
""Spider-Man, Hulk, Boomerang, Tarantula, Scorpion, Hotdog Vendor"
The last one has the coolest superhero name ever!"

I dunno, it’s pretty hard to beat Teenage Negasonic Warhead. Unless it’s in an actual fight. Apparently the print version went down like a sack of grain her first time in combat, which is why Fox had to work a deal with Disney (mod TNW’s power set in exchange for being allowed to use Ego in GotG2) so they could make her as powerful as her name suggests in the first Deadpool film."

For some reason I had thought the deal was for the Skrulls, not Ego, but the timeline of that wouldn't make sense. Still, I'm not sure why Fox would have gotten Ego, when he's been in more Thor comics than Fantastic Four ones."

It’s based on a few things. Both Fox and Marvel had film rights to Scarlet Witch and Quicksilver. Fox claimed them because they’re mutants, all of which got bundled in with the X-Men deal. Marvel also claimed access to them because they were longtime members of the Avengers. Ultimately, they agreed to share the two characters, but Marvel couldn’t call them Mutants and Fox couldn’t call them Avengers.

Gunn apparently thought they had Ego under the MCU, because he built GotG2 around the character and would have had to scrap the entire plot if Fox hadn’t approached Marvel about tweaking NSW’s power set. There are so many characters and they sold so much of the film rights that figuring out exactly who owned which character was enough to give you an aneurism. Any character who debuted in an X-title, whether mutant or not, could fall under the Fox X-Men deal, as would any character who’s actually a mutant in the comics. But the same logic works in reverse, and you could potentially have three studios claiming access to a single character depending on the character’s publication history.

@RogueWhistler said:
" @Crux said:
" @ToysFromTheAttic said:
" @behemothjosh said:
"If you ever try to build a city with only marvel sets, there will be more spidermans than non-super citizens."

The same could be said for Harry Potter sets. "

I disagree. There are very few spider-people in the Harry Potter franchise."

What, Aragog's not people?"

Aragog in his surly teenage years: 71021-9

@King_J said:
"Finally! My favorite Marvel hero in Lego form: Hot Dog Vendor!"

Played by Stan Lee in one movie or another...

@PurpleDave said:
" @RogueWhistler said:
" @Crux said:
" @ToysFromTheAttic said:
" @behemothjosh said:
"If you ever try to build a city with only marvel sets, there will be more spidermans than non-super citizens."

The same could be said for Harry Potter sets. "

I disagree. There are very few spider-people in the Harry Potter franchise."

What, Aragog's not people?"

Aragog in his surly teenage years: 71021-9"

Proved my point. :-)

@PurpleDave said:
" @LuccaTalksYT said:
" @BLProductions said:
"Bland, boring, overpriced, Marvel is dead, etc. etc.

That Spiderman figure 76346 has too much poseability for a LEGO set... waiting for the lawsuit from Hasbro or whoever has the action figure license."
Have you seen the average post 2024 big Ninjago Mech? If they haven’t got a lawsuit from the action figure thing they never will."

Ninjago is a fully in-house theme. There’s nobody with an action figure license to sue them. This is in reference to the dusty old myth that Hasbro complained about a series of minifig 3-packs stepping on their rights as the action figure license holder, and forced TLG to stop making minifig-only sets."

“Myth” is an accurate terminology for it. It didn’t stop LEGO from making Buildable Figures for licensed themes in 2012 and 2015-2018. However, Ninjago Titan Mechs aren’t the only examples of great articulation. Despite their less than stellar looks, the 2022 Marvel Figures had decent articulation and could provoke such a reaction from the action figure producing license holders, more certainly than minifigs, and alas they did not.

The Spider-Man vs. Hulk set is genuinely pathetic

@LuccaTalksYT said:
"“Myth” is an accurate terminology for it. It didn’t stop LEGO from making Buildable Figures for licensed themes in 2012 and 2015-2018. However, Ninjago Titan Mechs aren’t the only examples of great articulation. Despite their less than stellar looks, the 2022 Marvel Figures had decent articulation and could provoke such a reaction from the action figure producing license holders, more certainly than minifigs, and alas they did not."

The logic was basically that it’s a construction toy if you have to build it, and an action figure if you don’t. Most minifigs require at least a little assembly, but a few lines have shippe with them preassembled, like watches, Nintendo cases, and mining magnets. But CMFs and polybags don’t, and they’ve never done the former, but the latter used to be a staple for May 4th, and they still do magazine gifts. And further muddying the waters, Hasbro has done construtable action figures and podracers. So the line between construction toy and action figure is messy.

@ACubeInABox said:
"I can't believe we finally got soviet bloc apartment: the LEGO set. A bit odd that it comes through the Marvel line instead of the Icons line, but I can overlook that.

Also, the hot dog vendor on the back of the box is breaking LEGO physics, I wonder what's up with that lol"

The wall panels are "inside-out", so the two halves of her hand are on either side of the thin part.

Oh, right. Did we do the obligatory "HARGLBLARGH THE LEGOES AND THE MILLITTARRY VEHACALS"-bit already?

Terrible sets to a terrible theme! Had to be said at least by 1! Waste of Plastic all together!

@RogueWhistler said:
" @Crux said:
" @ToysFromTheAttic said:
" @behemothjosh said:
"If you ever try to build a city with only marvel sets, there will be more spidermans than non-super citizens."

The same could be said for Harry Potter sets. "

I disagree. There are very few spider-people in the Harry Potter franchise."

What, Aragog's not people?"

Yes. The answer is yes.

Is the hot dog vendor's hair a new Lego element? I don't recall seeing it before.