LEGO Disney 43302 Main Street, U.S.A. revealed!

I don't want it, and this one is going to fly off the shelves. Perfect.

While this might have little international appeal, the architecture does look nice without the price. And those boaters look wonderful too, shame that the band around the crown is not coloured.

Whilst PPP seems normal, it doesn't feel a substantial set for the price. But why do I always say that with Disney sets? (Particularly when Shrek seems very well priced).

$550 is insane. I'll just stick with 31141 Main Street.

Okay, the character shirts are Mickey Mouse, Stitch, Flounder, classic Stormtrooper, some version of Spiderman, Claw Alien, and Ray the firefly.

This is right up my alley, and I would love to have it and modify it for my town as enclosed buildings sans baseplates... if it wasn't four hundred bucks! I can't possibly afford that, so I guess it will stay only a dream.

@leetshoe said:
"I wish they did not use an open back"

that is one of the few positive aspects of this for me. But otherwise, very little of interest here.

I only want to know one thing: Was Boone Langston involved with the design of this; and did he include the fire truck build as a nod to his Bricklink Designer firetruck set??
Looks like an exact mini!

Did they mess up on the Crystal Arcade Pearl Gold roof trim?

Right hand side seems differently spaced...

As a model it feels oddly simplistic given the price and subject matter. There are some nice details, but when compared to something like Disney Castle it falls kind of flat as a model.

I ended up getting the Disney Princess Market Adventure (and the similar standalone builds) to function as a kind of makeshift Main Street USA. Looks like I made the right choice.

Feels like an overpriced mickey mouse ears battle pack! How many different ways can LEGO create a specialized mouse ears part and hide it in this set?

Nothing really wow about this set, other than the high price.

This seems like a great companion to 71044, and is well done for the subject matter. I think this will make a lot of Disney enthusiasts happy, particularly grandparents who have a memory there and are watching their grandchildren play with it.

I think most of my Disney needs were satisfied by the 100th Anniversary sets a couple of years ago. Might still get Winnie the Pooh but no plans to get this.

I knew the builds wouldn’t be what I would ideally want, but I did hope I’d like them more than I do. They aren’t bad - just not iconic enough for me to care about and underdetailed to make me care.

I do like the quartet and the various mouse ear hats and pieces, but will wait to try to get any u til the prices drop a bit

Wow, such anniversary set! Will be discounted before November.
This set has 0 charm and this stupid black box only makes it worse. Just compare it to 71044 Disney Train and station.

+ few nice torsos
+ new hats?
+ no closed back to make price lower

- price
- flat
- 0 charm
- dull

I was expecting something more like 75978 Diagon Alley where I would have both sides of the street. So this is going to take quite a bit of work to improve.

The amount of the detail for the set is impressive, with a lot of sticker and small pieces representing all the store stock. I do like the figure selection. Building selection isn't too bad, I wasn't expecting the Fire Dept and would have preferred a food vender. I think I would have preferred multiple sets with each building being separate and a little larger. Higher price total, but could have spaced it out more.

I only want the Stitch, Alien, Stormtrooper and Spiderman torsos

It has some neat features. I might be able to get inspired for my own modular ideas from this. But at $400, I will have to pass.

And not that Brickset users are the end all be all, but 76% say no they will not be buying it. The crazy thing is the other 24% that might buy it plus the people who aren't on Brickset buying it will likely hit their metric and it will be a success.

Hogsmeade Village had my expectations tempered for what this would be, but this is fairly awful. Architecture detail, colours, depth and the chosen “buildings”. I’m disappointed, but also relieved that my wallet is safe. If this was anyway decent, I’d have had to buy it and mod it. Outside of the minifigs, there’s nothing to work with here.

What is the guy with Stitch shirt holding?

Finally I can recreate this epic scene from the Friends tv-show.

@CC said:
"What is the guy with Stitch shirt holding?"

A churro?

It looks great, but priced like Disney.

I want the churro piece!

I'd say I want a minifig-scale Haunted Mansion, but this lowers my expectations for such a hypothetical set.

Praise Disney parks employees, who eventually have a proper reward for their hard job as they now appear in Lego Minifigures catalog.

a Potemkin village (true to Lego City fashion)

@WokePope said:
"MOST IMPORTANT QUESTION - Is the straw boater hat in LEGO new and how can I get 20 of them"

Yes, and it will most likely end up on OPAB. The Mickey ears balloon top and Minnie Mouse ears accessory should be IP-locked, so those will be harder to obtain.

@GrizBe said:
" @WokePope said:
"Looks VERY small for both the price and piece count."

I don't think Piece count is a good metric for judging a sets value anymore given how many sets seem to inflate that count with single stud pieces/tiles/accessories etc. Wish they'd put a weight on the sets so we could judge price per gram or something. "

unless you’re talking baseplates, electronics, or exclusive molds that they need to pay off from sales of that set alone, quantity has much more bearing on cost to produce than weight does.

@chief7575 said:
"Feels like an overpriced mickey mouse ears battle pack! How many different ways can LEGO create a specialized mouse ears part and hide it in this set?"

Hidden Mickeys are a tradition, you know.

@blueduck37 said:
"I've been to all. They all have shopping districts at the front, but they aren't all themed around an American Main Street (except Hong Kong), because Asia has no context for that. Shanghai for instance has "Mickey Avenue". The one in Tokyo (World Bazaar!) is also very different in style."

Fair enough. That whole front district does seem like it should serve a similar purpose in every Disney park, but they don’t all need to look the same.

@jjr_2009 said:
"…Mickey ears…"

Missed those. Nobody’s wearing them!

Eh. I'll get one eventually, but this one is not one I'm going to make a special trip to the Lego store for. Besides, there's already a pricey set I have my eye on for June that's more appealing.

Those themed shirts on the minifigs are so cool!

Very interesting use of the Pirate Spidey torso (SH1105)

I like it. Great selection of minifigs, new parts…FINALLY Mickey Ears. New color parts. Builds look good.

I feel like we were spoiled by Diagon Alley though. That to me feels like a great $400 set. I’m even hesitant to get Hogsmeade because it’s the same price, but doesn’t feel quite as substantial. This feels like that buildings wise. All the accessories & prints are awesome, but the Main Street feels a bit lacking… they had a great format in DA, 4 16x32 buildings, arrange as you like.

It’s visually appealing to me and I think it’ll make a nice backdrop on a shelf (I am impressed by the length as seen in the lifestyle image with the person), but $400 for what’s essentially a facade seems overpriced.

Nice set.
Full interior etc, would have made it even more expensive.

@GusG said:
"at least 100$ too much"

Without minifigs, then that -100$ would be reasonable.

Rock.mid.gif

Side note, I absolutely LOVE how they did the churro build

Love the Barber Shop quartet--Disneyland has some of the best musical groups just wandering around anywhere. I remember in high school, being there with the band, and rather than going on rides, a group of us just sat there listening to a small jazz combo for half an hour. Last time I went, there was a percussion group dressed as the army men from Toy Story who were also fantastic.

The minifigures are bland and boring in my opinion.

I definitely want some of those torsos.

I am so glad that I have 71044. At least that was a good one. Yet still not a strong seller or LEGO wouldn't have discounted it so much back in the day, when I bought it for 230 Euro from LEGO online.

I mean, price per piece isn't that bad for the IP, and the set looks pretty good...but no depth to it at that price doesn't make it a day-one purchase unless you're a big Disney fan.

I would like to have this but doubt it would go down to $300, at which point I would bite.

Looks great. The buildings are fine for the purpose of this set. It's not meant to be a Modular or anything like that.

It's the same style as the recent Harry Potter buildings.

It's low on my list, but I think it's a good set and the price is fine.

Some of the figures remind me of good old goalpost-head:

https://reddwarf.fandom.com/wiki/Rimmer%27s_New_Officer%27s_Club?file=Officer-Rimmer.png

Looks like the cheap movie props for building facades. Sorry, but the minifigures and Disney references don't make up for this mediocrity. Would have been better to expand the large Diagon Alley with more shops of the other street side.

WOW that is flat. It almost makes Hogsmeade look more tempting to buy instead...almost.

@PurpleDave said:
" @GrizBe said:
" @WokePope said:
"Looks VERY small for both the price and piece count."

I don't think Piece count is a good metric for judging a sets value anymore given how many sets seem to inflate that count with single stud pieces/tiles/accessories etc. Wish they'd put a weight on the sets so we could judge price per gram or something. "

unless you’re talking baseplates, electronics, or exclusive molds that they need to pay off from sales of that set alone, quantity has much more bearing on cost to produce than weight does."

Fair enough... unfortunately there doesn't seem to be a universal measure for value for money with Lego anymore... unless we implement some kind of math formula along the lines of Value = (Peice Count / Weight) + Tech + Rarity , all / £Cost.

Reminds me of the real Disney main streets, lots of interesting shop fronts, but just one big generic shop inside.
Mind you, Shanghai Disneyland has the shortest Main Street ever. Didn't seem right..
Anyway, as for this set.. I like it 8o)

I like it but maybe could’ve done without the fire station and truck in lieu of another building. I don’t find it an iconic enough feature for the parks.

Oh, and Walt needs a cigarette in his hand to make it truly realistic lol….

Looks great! Just like Diagon Alley, but the buildings look nicer. Very nice.

Really like this. Unfortunately, it's well outside of my Lego budget.

I'm guessing the Dapper Dans don't want Fop?

The fact that the buildings don’t really have depth, will work pretty good in cabinets. Especially if you want a Disney parade in front of it.
And then you can add the mini versions of those disney castles as a backdrop to make it even more disney park.
I think the set works. The idea of having a rather dull street full of merchandise as a set is pretty ridiculous of course, but sure why not!
I even think that this set will probably sell very well. Imagine you can have your own sigfig enjoying the disney main street. That is as if you’re always in Disneyland.

@GrizBe said:
"Fair enough... unfortunately there doesn't seem to be a universal measure for value for money with Lego anymore... unless we implement some kind of math formula along the lines of Value = (Peice Count / Weight) + Tech + Rarity , all / £Cost."

I don’t rely too heavily on any metric, but I do pay attention to PPP more than anything else. I know that, nominally, coming in under $0.10/pc is a good thing, assuming I like the set and/or minifigs (I don’t sort sets that I buy for parts/minifigs, so I have a more realistic idea of how much I actually use the parts from those sets, and it’s a lot less than most people probably expect). I know that large parts like baseplates throw the math off, and dinosaurs _really_ throw it off. One-off designs (like dinosaurs) have to pay off their mold over the production life of the set they were created for, or we don’t get those parts. Electronics drive PPP up as well.

That’s all stuff that has to drive prices up. Then there’s stuff where I’m certain they’re using the Disney park strategy, where they raise the price with the intention of curbing demand. CMFs are a great example of this, as they jumped from $2 to $5 fairly quickly, and then haven’t budged since. Most AFOLs are no longer buying up whole cases in one purchase, which means the demand is more stable over the life of that series. I’m pretty sure SW is treated this way as well. I was told that SW UCS is the only large D2C line that they _know_ will have high demand on day of release, where every other theme they’re basically just guessing how many to stock to each store in advance. I was 11th in line for the UCS MF2 when the store manager had to work to convince them to send him one dozen copies for the VIP launch. And I was again in line on the day some UCS set released at the same time as the Muppets CMF wave, and again when the Renegade II launched, and the lines of people waiting to buy those UCS sets _right_now_ is just unreal.

That UCS MF2? If they’d sent enough, that store could have sold at least 30 copies (limit 1) within an hour of opening. Lower all the prices to $0.10/pc, and anything remotely armybuilder in nature is going to get bought by the armful. Higher prices mean little Timmy’s mom doesn’t burn some customer service rep’s ear off, outraged that she stopped by after picking him up from school, only to find out AFOLs had bought everything.

So most times when I see a set that seems wildly overpriced, I can usually figure out what caused the price hike. Not for the Hoopty, though. That never made any sense. And when I see people gushing over $0.05-$0.08/pc, I can usually look it over and determine that I wouldn’t get much value out of that set in spite of the absurdly low PPP. Besides, I also build a lot of MOCs, and I don’t recycle them into my collection. That will humble anyone who rails against sets costing too much.

@Lyichir said:
" @Joshua_Eisenman said:
"I want the churro piece!"

I think the churro is just brick-built out of common parts—a tan technic pin-axle, white technic pin bushing, white 2-length bar with stop ring, and white 1x1 round plate with through hole."
You’re totally right! I only saw it in one picture and my mind didn’t comprehend what it saw, so it said "hey look, a new piece!"

@badwolf630 said:
"It should have been the Monorail instead of this.
Monorail!
Monorail!
"

I hear those things are awfully loud!

looks pretty good. I think the fire station doesn't look as good as the 2 other buildings. indoor may also actually look better than the outdoor. looks like a 250 to 300€ set though

@AustinPowers said:
"I am so glad that I have 71044 . At least that was a good one. Yet still not a strong seller or LEGO wouldn't have discounted it so much back in the day, when I bought it for 230 Euro from LEGO online. "

That's just the thing. I really wanted 71044 . But buying it at MRSP in Canada would have been proof enough that I had gone insane and should be sent to the asylum. I would have been happy to buy one at EUR 230 (that would have been CAD$100 less than the then Canadian MRSP). (Mind you, I've done some transactions in the past where the people in white coats must have been very near!)

This sort of behaviour is becoming quite normal now: a customer wants a set but not at the stated price (i.e. very nice but not $XXX nice). As always in capitalism, Lego's game is to extract the most money for its products and the consumers' game is to acquire as much product for the least amount of money. That said, sometimes selling 7 items at $9 will net you a bigger amount (sales) than 5 items at $12 (as an example). There exists a point where the same strategy can be optimised for profits as well (sales is one thing - mostly for market shares - but profits is what really matters). Lego does not need to do this as it revels in making some of its products limited or rare to create a sense of value.

As for this set, I'm not the target market so I'll leave it at that. My only gripe so far in 2026 is: Lego is now making nearly a thousand sets per year and in the last two years, I could not see one recolour useful for my mocs. At least now, I have significantly more chances to eventually get one useful recolour with so many different sets produced.

What's the story with the gap above the windows on the right side of the fire station? Weird!
That's not a bug, it's a feature; because it shows on the 'blueprint' on the back of the box.

I wanted to like this but sooooo many stickers. I like the Minifigs but not enough to spend $400 for them.

@GrizBe said:
"Well just showed this to a friend of mine whose an absolute Disney fanatic, and her response was 'Is that it?'... Oh dear. Seems even the core fans are disappointed by this attempt. "

Good point. I have been thinking the same thing, myself. "Main Street, U.S.A.," as they're called in Disneyland and in Walt Disney World's Magic Kingdom, is more impressive and substantial than what is shown here. I recognize the three buildings, easily, but there ought to be more at that price point, anyway.

As others have pointed it, it might supplement 71044 Disney Train Station well, but it doesn't appear the scale is the same.

That being said, I like the Easter eggs that I'm spotting already; for example, the lit lamp in the center window of the firehouse.

It looks boring.

A nice and expensive set that nobody wanted or asked for...

I like this. It’s got a good western vibe to it if minifigs were replaced with cowboys.

Where are all the pieces? This looks like a 2700-3000 piece set that should be going for the corresponding price point...

¿Donde se han ido todas las piezas?. Ni con dos juegos completas esos edificios...

Was super excited when I saw the headline. But what a disappointment! Terrible design!!

@riversarl said:
"I do like the microbuilds of Disney attractions on the top floor of the shops. I can make out (from left to right):

- Possible Matterhorn Bobsleds?
- Monorail
- Disney steamboat
- Hollywood Tower of Terror
- Another monorail (people mover?)
- Space Mountain
- Haunted Mansion
- Big Thunder Mountain
- Cinderella's Castle
- Disneyland Railway steam train
- It's a Small World
- Splash Mountain

Very cute! I wish these came in an advent calendar instead :P"

You missed the entire first floor. Some of them include "props" from the films instead of settings. I've got Beauty & the Beast's rose, Cinderella's Gus, Up's house, Wall-E, and I'm not really sure what the treehouse is from.

I don't know about this. It's kind of nice, but I don't know if I $400 like it...

I'd only start to maybe consider this at 4x VIP points.

C'mon Lego, give us the Disney monorail.

This CLEARLY was designed to be a bestseller in Lego shops in disney parks.

Is that Ted Lasso with an ice cream? Perhaps he's come to recruit the barbershop quartet in a match?

This would go well as backdrop buildings for the 71044 Disney Train and Station, but on its own missing something.

The medium nougat besides the cool yellow really irks me, which is weird as 10312 Jazz Club and 41379 Heartlake City restaurant also use it, and I love it there, especially in the latter. Maybe it's the green windows?

The composition is also off, with one large section of buildings, and one much smaller.

@HOBBES said:
"What's the story with the gap above the windows on the right side of the fire station? Weird!
That's not a bug, it's a feature; because it shows on the 'blueprint' on the back of the box."

I don’t think it’s a gap, I think it might be clear 1x2 plates.

@StyleCounselor said:
" @jhoya said:
" @WokePope said:
"Looks VERY small for both the price and piece count. Not a winner in my book. Minifigs are fine but nothing particularly exciting for so many unique prints.

Good group for recreating Disney Adult madness in your LEGO town, though. WATCH as the grown humans line up for hours and drop thousands of dollars on limited-edition pins and assorted junk so they can go back to their hotel and do their unboxing videos!"

Buddy, most of us are adults who have an obsessive hobby revolving around plastic toys. Let’s not throw stones "

I logged in just to like this comment. ;)"

Me too! While not a Disney fan, I think it is time AFOLs accept that Disney (including Star Wars) sets come with a licensing fee that increases the price tag to what is, perhaps an uncomfortable level. If looking for value stick with Creator.

Wasn't really interested in the set, but that is underwhelming for $400. That's a $200-$250 set at best and it doesn't even look finished.

@Sprinter said:
" @StyleCounselor said:
" @jhoya said:
" @WokePope said:
"Looks VERY small for both the price and piece count. Not a winner in my book. Minifigs are fine but nothing particularly exciting for so many unique prints.

Good group for recreating Disney Adult madness in your LEGO town, though. WATCH as the grown humans line up for hours and drop thousands of dollars on limited-edition pins and assorted junk so they can go back to their hotel and do their unboxing videos!"

Buddy, most of us are adults who have an obsessive hobby revolving around plastic toys. Let’s not throw stones "

I logged in just to like this comment. ;)"

Me too! While not a Disney fan, I think it is time AFOLs accept that Disney (including Star Wars) sets come with a licensing fee that increases the price tag to what is, perhaps an uncomfortable level. If looking for value stick with Creator. "

City and Friends can also provide good value.

@TheOtherMike Already went into the whole rarity, and electronics etc points with @PurpleDave somewhat.

Think while most people use PPP as a metric for value, as said when alot of sets are using single stud pieces its not that great of a value for alot of people. Nore, as various points have mentioned with piece rarity, complexity of moulding etc. is weight a better alternative.

You'd think as a lego fan group we'd be able to pool our minds together to find some way or working out value for money that combined everything. And short of having to have some kind of formula with weight divided by piece count, adding some kind rarity and tech and dividing it by cost, i really can't think of a better solution that would be accepted or backed up by figures.

@GBP_Chris, @Tc99m, & Seconding @TheOtherMike re: am wheelchair user and unlikely to drop dead any time soon.

Also, personally I appreciated that they didn’t decide wheelchair users shouldn’t cosplay as/wear shirts for superheroes. Because that is occasionally a thing. Despite approximately zero cosplayers having actual superpowers.

@PurpleDave said:
" @riversarl said:
"I do like the microbuilds of Disney attractions on the top floor of the shops. I can make out (from left to right):

- Possible Matterhorn Bobsleds?
- Monorail
- Disney steamboat
- Hollywood Tower of Terror
- Another monorail (people mover?)
- Space Mountain
- Haunted Mansion
- Big Thunder Mountain
- Cinderella's Castle
- Disneyland Railway steam train
- It's a Small World
- Splash Mountain

Very cute! I wish these came in an advent calendar instead :P"

You missed the entire first floor. Some of them include "props" from the films instead of settings. I've got Beauty & the Beast's rose, Cinderella's Gus, Up's house, Wall-E, and I'm not really sure what the treehouse is from."

Swiss Family Robinson or Tarzan are my best guesses.

@Graysmith said:
"They should've done this as an ongoing series of sets with one building in each set instead. Looking at the real location there's easily 10 shops/buildings that could be their own standalone sets, including the cinema, train station and city hall. That could've allowed for more substantial buildings and make them more obtainable ($100-150 per set a la Winter Village) for the more casual fan who just wants maybe just one or two of the buildings."

Except the real Main Street is a bunch of storefronts hiding a handful of actual stores. Like, you walk in the door of one storefront, browse your way to the other end of the store, and exit three storefronts down the row. The exteriors are all illusion and sneaky wordplay. Take out the fire station and that’s basically what you have. _One_ Main Street store hiding behind a series of facades. Meijer does (did?) this with some of their stores, where part of the storefront is made to look like a downtown shopping district, but it’s all just one giant store behind them.

Sometimes it baffles me how LEGO can go from Minas Tirith on one day and then the Great Wall of Main Street the next. It's like they don't consult with any actual fans out there when developing these sets.

Sometimes it baffles me how LEGO can go from Minas Tirith on one day and then the Great Wall of Main Street the next. It's like they don't consult with any actual fans out there when developing these sets.

@TheOtherMike said:
"Yeah, I count four new molds, the balloon top, the mouse ears with bow, the mouse ears without bow, and the... honestly I'm not sure what that pink piece on the girl next to the girl Mickey is handing the balloon to is supposed to be. Is it a set of balloon ears?"

There are three different elements of the Minnie Mouse ears. The girl is wearing classic red/black, the woman next to her is wearing pink/trans-pink, and inside the store you can also find a grey/silver version. But they’ll all be from the same mold. The fourth new mold present here is the straw boater hat, which has zero Mickey ears.

Nice sticker collection! Ahahah! It's unfortunate because the set looks very good...

@Crux said:
" @Hiratha said:
" @GBP_Chris, @Tc99m, & Seconding @TheOtherMike re: am wheelchair user and unlikely to drop dead any time soon.

Also, personally I appreciated that they didn’t decide wheelchair users shouldn’t cosplay as/wear shirts for superheroes. Because that is occasionally a thing. Despite approximately zero cosplayers having actual superpowers."

Conversely, some superheroes have disabilities. Sun-Spider has EDS, and sometimes webslings from her wheelchair. Charles Xavier led the X-Men from his solid gold hoverchair for decades, although people weren't really wondering "what happened to that guy's legs?", moreso "how does he affort a gold hoverchair and a mansion on a teacher's salary?". I like to believe MODOK and Xavier are on the same gold-hoverchair-afficionado mailing-list.

Hawkeye chooses to use a bow. It's not technically a disability, but it is a crippling handicap."

Sun-Spider, as it happens, has my disability. Or condition, I suppose, since expression is so variable, but hers is fairly similar. I’m very fond of her and her appearance in the Spider-Verse CMF range had me unbearably smug. Zebras ftw.

Hawkeye is sometimes deaf but they’re very inconsistent about it. Because (american) comics. Consistency is for other mediums and nations.

Man, Human Torch really busted himself up.

I think the set is... fine. I like the exteriors and the minifigures, but the interiors are lacking and it's too overpriced.

@GrizBe said:
" @TheOtherMike Already went into the whole rarity, and electronics etc points with @PurpleDave somewhat.

Think while most people use PPP as a metric for value, as said when alot of sets are using single stud pieces its not that great of a value for alot of people. Nore, as various points have mentioned with piece rarity, complexity of moulding etc. is weight a better alternative.

You'd think as a lego fan group we'd be able to pool our minds together to find some way or working out value for money that combined everything. And short of having to have some kind of formula with weight divided by piece count, adding some kind rarity and tech and dividing it by cost, i really can't think of a better solution that would be accepted or backed up by figures. "

To echo @PurpleDave, there is no objective metric of value that everyone will agree on. Ultimately, it comes down to "Do I think this set is a good value *for me?*"

@PurpleDave said:" @TheOtherMike said:"Yeah, I count four new molds, the balloon top, the mouse ears with bow, the mouse ears without bow, and the... honestly I'm not sure what that pink piece on the girl next to the girl Mickey is handing the balloon to is supposed to be. Is it a set of balloon ears?"

There are three different elements of the Minnie Mouse ears. The girl is wearing classic red/black, the woman next to her is wearing pink/trans-pink, and inside the store you can also find a grey/silver version. But they’ll all be from the same mold. The fourth new mold present here is the straw boater hat, which has zero Mickey ears."

I should have clarified that I meant four new molds *with mouse ears.* Wonder if any of those will find any use outside of future Disney Park sets...

@hazatronic said:
"Did they mess up on the Crystal Arcade Pearl Gold roof trim?

Right hand side seems differently spaced..."

Came here to say it.

Another one of these "too much to pay in one go, would've been better if the buildings could be bought separately" sets (similar to 76457 Hogsmeade Village). At essentially $470 here it's way too much for me, especially as I really only care about the toy shop part - it seems like just right to be converted to a 16x16 mini-modular (while two could make a full-size one). Not too interested in the fire station as I already have the 10197 Fire Brigade (and I guess many who has 10263 Winter Village Fire Station would think the same) and the Crystal Arcade part is just a total mess.

@GrizBe said:
" @Crux said:
"Hawkeye chooses to use a bow. It's not technically a disability, but it is a crippling handicap."

Actually, Hawkeye was depicted as deaf and needing hearing aids in the comics. Well, at least during the 80's...

Not to mention other superheroes with disabilities such as DareDevil (Blind), Oracle (wheelchair), Doctor Strange (nerve damaged hands) and many others."

I could be pedantic and say it's Hawkeye (Barton) who's deaf, but not Hawkeye (Bishop) - and I'd be right, but at what cost? You're right, Barton's reasonably consistently portrayed as having a hearing-aid. Most importantly, in the Aja/Fraction run that also gave us Pizza Dog. I feel it was integrated pretty well there.

Daredevil surely isn't blind! You must have him confused with blind lawyer, Matt Murdock. It's okay, it happens all the time.

@Crux said:
" @GrizBe said:
" @Crux said:
"Hawkeye chooses to use a bow. It's not technically a disability, but it is a crippling handicap."

Actually, Hawkeye was depicted as deaf and needing hearing aids in the comics. Well, at least during the 80's...

Not to mention other superheroes with disabilities such as DareDevil (Blind), Oracle (wheelchair), Doctor Strange (nerve damaged hands) and many others."

I could be pedantic and say it's Hawkeye (Barton) who's deaf, but not Hawkeye (Bishop) - and I'd be right, but at what cost? You're right, Barton's reasonably consistently portrayed as having a hearing-aid. Most importantly, in the Aja/Fraction run that also gave us Pizza Dog. I feel it was integrated pretty well there.

Daredevil surely isn't blind! You must have him confused with blind lawyer, Matt Murdock. It's okay, it happens all the time."

And some people think that Superman and Clark Kent look alike, but that's ridiculous. Kent wears glasses.

Not gonna lie getting REALLY tired of inclusive lego sets not really this one I just noticed it but also giving all the death slice storm troopers diffrent races but not giving C-3PO a dual molded leg is infuriating

... That Wall-E is really cute

@Good_Username said:
"Not gonna lie getting REALLY tired of inclusive lego sets not really this one I just noticed it but also giving all the death slice storm troopers diffrent races but not giving C-3PO a dual molded leg is infuriating

... That Wall-E is really cute"

Why are you telling us about your crippling insecurities? None of us can fix this, and I don't even want to try. Maybe take this stupid, soulcrushingly basic complaint to Truth Social, where it belongs. There's a better than average chance that the Orange Goblin will actually pick it up during his next rage-truthing all-nighter, and he might declare war on Denmark over it.

Or he might send ICE over to Disneyland. Even odds, really.

@Crux said:
" @Good_Username said:
"Not gonna lie getting REALLY tired of inclusive lego sets not really this one I just noticed it but also giving all the death slice storm troopers diffrent races but not giving C-3PO a dual molded leg is infuriating

... That Wall-E is really cute"

Why are you telling us about your crippling insecurities? None of us can fix this, and I don't even want to try. Maybe take this stupid, soulcrushingly basic complaint to Truth Social, where it belongs. There's a better than average chance that the Orange Goblin will actually pick it up during his next rage-truthing all-nighter, and he might declare war on Denmark over it.

Or he might send ICE over to Disneyland. Even odds, really."

There's already ice in Disneyland, courtesy of Elsa... oh, that's not what you meant, is it?

@leetshoe said:
"I wish they did not use an open back"

Then it would cost twice as much.