21308 Adventure Time revealed!

Posted by ,
Adventure Time

Adventure Time

©2017 LEGO Group

Hot off the LEGO Ideas blog:

"We simply can’t contain ourselves anymore! We are extremely excited to be able to share with you official details of the upcoming LEGO Ideas 21308 Adventure Time set. In fact, we are so excited that we are giving you all a peek at the official product image well in advance of the 1st of January, 2017 official launch of this set.

Here is the official product description:

Build LEGO brick versions of eight of your favorite Adventure Time characters and role-play scenes from the awesome Cartoon Network show. This set includes Finn, Jake, Princess Bubblegum, Lady Rainicorn, Marceline, BMO, Gunter and Ice King. Use the included accessories to create your own stories and make every day a fun adventure!"

Fan designer, Ludovic, shares his experiences:

"Originally designed by LEGO Ideas member Ludovic Piraud, better known to some in the fan community as aBetterMonkey, Ludovic experienced watching Adventure Time as "a good way to escape the routine after a hard day at work and to recharge the batteries".

"The appeal for adult viewers like me I think comes from how it taps into the nostalgia of childhood play fantasies where imagination goes wild. As does playing with LEGO bricks, as a matter of fact" Ludovic goes on to tell about his interest in Adventure Time.

When asked how it felt once he learned his project had gained 10,000 supporters and later was selected to become one of the next official LEGO Ideas sets, Ludovic explained "It felt unreal. I didn't think at first that what started as a fun little challenging pet project would receive so much support so fast. I was even afraid at some point that I would not have the time to submit the last update before the 10000th vote hit! That was really thrilling and I started to think that I may have a chance to tell my kids one day "See this LEGO set? Your dad made it!". Now that it's passed the LEGO review we know it's going to happen and that makes me very, very happy."

--

"21308 Adventure Time contains 495-bricks and will be available to purchase on the 1st of January, 2017 for a recommended retail price of USD 44.99.

Keep an eye on the LEGO Ideas blog for more details, closer to the launch date."

66 comments on this article

Gravatar
By in United States,

Black sausage arms? Time to hit Bricklink...

Gravatar
By in United States,

Fun set. I'm surprised they stuck with the original project and made all these characters, rather than having one or two of them and a vehicle or scenery or something. Plus they didn't just down-scale everything and re-use the Jake, Finn or BMO minifigs from Dimensions. Good on TLG!

Gravatar
By in United States,

Why can't LEGO change joint colors? That kind of ruins the point of getting this set for me.

Gravatar
By in Ireland,

Cute! I don't really "get" this show, but this is a nice set for fans and for kids to play with.

Gravatar
By in United States,

@Broken Cheese Slope: I think it has something to do with different colors of legos being more brittle, or less suitable for some of the more high-stress connections like those joints. I remember way back with the Bionicle Mahri, the neon green sholder pieces, every single one I had, have broken. I haven't had an issue with any other color, just the neon green. So it could be something like that, but I'm not a scientist, so it's just my guess. Either that or the other colors would cost too much money?

Gravatar
By in Canada,

A little shame this set doesn't include Fiona.

Gravatar
By in United Kingdom,

I love this concept; it's new and fresh! I have no interest in the show however these characters look really cool and funky! One thing that puts me off is the price relative to the models. The set looks so expensive but I guess given it's 495 pieces it makes sense being priced at USD 49.99. Still a day one purchase for me!?

I find it hard for kids to play with these though given only the arms move and the way they are built they could easily break, I guess LEGO did their part on product testing. It doesn't concern me though as they'll be for display! :)

Gravatar
By in United States,

I predict another BBT ho hum for this set.

Gravatar
By in Australia,

Oh my glob! Love this set, can't wait.

Gravatar
By in United States,

This will probably be the first Ideas set that I do not purchase. Having never seen the show, (I watch alot of TV BTW, including much of Adult Swim), this set might be a little too niche. Its a great story behind the designer and how he can't wait to tell his children he made the set... I'm very happy for him :)

Gravatar
By in New Zealand,

Ugly set with the tiniest of niche markets. Can't see this selling at all. It beggars belief that it made it through to being a product. I can only think it's here because somebody said "Hey, we've got the licence so, y'know, we may as well. Whatevs..."

Gravatar
By in United States,

@kipper147: The lime green joints issue with 2007 Bionicle sets had nothing to do with certain colors being inherently more brittle — there was just a bad batch of joints that year that didn't cool properly after being molded, and they happened to be lime (Bright Yellowish Green). It could have just as easily happened with any other color.

Certain parts are "color-locked", such as certain types of Technic pins and gears. They may have been available in other colors in the past, but are only available to designers of current sets in one or two colors each, mostly for ease of telling them apart. But it could also just be a matter of budget — designers choosing to spend their recolor budget on more basic parts that are likely to be used more often, or on decorative parts like the crystals on the Ice King's crown, rather than on joint pieces that are used rarely, often mostly covered up anyway, and neutral-colored by default.

Personally, I don't think this model really loses much from having the joint pieces in the usual grey. On most of them it's not really even that noticeable at a glance — the only one where it is super noticeable on the main picture is Ice King, because it has the back side of the joints facing the viewer.

@Adzbadboy: I agree, brick-built figures are pretty clever, and something that not too many people think about as an option for sets, but they're great for characters who have distinctive shapes. I'm not really an Adventure Time (though it seems like the kind of thing I'd enjoy if I gave it a chance), but I am a fan of Steven Universe, another Cartoon Network show. I think brick-built figures could probably do a much better job recreating the vastly different body types of that show's characters than minifigures ever could.

@rainstorm26: Was the Big Bang Theory set not popular/successful? I seem to remember a LOT of excitement for that one, in spite of how much some people dislike that show. I think something to bear in mind about Ideas sets is that they're generally at least somewhat more niche than regular LEGO sets — if they weren't, then LEGO could probably realize how big an audience there is for them without needing fans to point it out to them. And anything niche is likely to be at least a bit divisive.

How many people thought LEGO Minecraft was a stupid idea, after all? But that didn't stop the sets (both the original Ideas set and the later expansions to the theme) from being wildly successful.

@Block-n-Roll: "Tiniest of niche markets"? How so? I've seen a LOT of Adventure Time merchandise on shelves, and they keep putting out more so SOMEBODY must be buying it. Likewise, the show's been running for seven seasons, been nominated for dozens of awards, and won over a dozen of them, so there's no doubt it's popular and successful. It's earned lots of critical acclaim as well. It's obviously no media and merchandising behemoth like Batman, Star Wars, or SpongeBob SquarePants, but it's hardly obscure or unpopular. Again, people expressed the same sort of disbelief about LEGO Minecraft and we've all seen how that turned out…

Gravatar
By in United States,

I certainly have zero interest in this set, but I suppose fans of it will be interested. Brick Built figures always seem more display than play though, so I wonder what the reception will be once this is released. Brick Built figures are really the only way to represent these characters, though. But maybe it will be a huge success. As a Lego fan I never want to see a set fail, as I feel any failure affects Lego overall. But I'd like to see other sets represented over this.

Gravatar
By in United States,

Not at all interested in this set, but it seems like a dream come true for Lego/AT fanatics. A few of those specialty face pieces seem great for some MOCs.

Gravatar
By in Canada,

My kids and I love Adventure Time, but I think I'll skip this set. I'd rather see this released as a treehouse set with AT minifigs. The blocky oversized figures look like something my kids could come up with on their own.

Gravatar
By in United States,

Neat set, I won't be buying this as I am saving my cash for two Rogue One sets.

Gravatar
By in United States,

This set seems pretty redundant now that we've seen what we're getting for Adventure Time in Lego Dimensions. The minifigures and builds are much more appealing than these brick-figures.

Gravatar
By in United States,

Aaaugh! Where did the Lich King, Lumpy Space Princess and Flame Princess disappear to? And little surprises from the Ideas set like Snail, Ricardio and Tree Trunks? Boo!

And agreed on grey arm joints being used on all the characters. (and black arms on BMO.) Deal breaker.

Gravatar
By in United Kingdom,

I will only buy this because it's an ideas set and I have all the others. The set itself does nothing for me, it's got to be the worse one yet.

Gravatar
By in United States,

@Aanchir I think the "obscure" label AT has been labeled with (I've seen it called that in other articles pertaining to this set ad well) stems from its lack of exposure outside the U.S. I don't think it's even available to watch in some countries.

Gravatar
By in Belgium,

Erm. No. That is all.

Gravatar
By in United States,

I probably won't get this, but the couple episodes I saw of the show were pretty funny.

Gravatar
By in United States,

Oh no... Not that show...

Gravatar
By in Brazil,

Much better execution than the Dimensions minifigs.

Gravatar
By in United Kingdom,

Safe to assume the show, and therefore the set, are like Marmite... The characterful builds are awesome but I'm still dreaming of what that Cateham 7 is going to look like!

Gravatar
By in United Kingdom,

Big fan of the show (which given the amount of merchandise that is available for it, is far from the 'niche' show that a few people claim - though I think they are using that term as an insult because they don't like it) but I'm not totally sold on the set.

Perhaps once I see it on the shelf I might change my mind.

Gravatar
By in Poland,

This would be better as few 2 packs.
I don't care for every fig I see.

Gravatar
By in Australia,

No Lemongrab ... UNACCEPTABLE!

Gravatar
By in New Zealand,

@natro220 I don't know about Europe, but Adventure Time is huge in Asia and the Pacific. It really is Cartoon Network's flagship show.

Love the subtle changes made to the original submission, especially Jake's muzzle (looks so much better than the minifig version) and Unikitty tails for Lady Rainicorn's mane! The designs are also simplistic enough to easily reverse engineer cut characters like Lemongrab and Flame Princess. And at least the grey Mixels joints are less noticeable than on the Rio mascot.

Gravatar
By in United States,

I'm sure there's no trans-clear stand to enable Marceline to hover, but I'll get this set anyway. It's mathematical.

Gravatar
By in United States,

I'm a fan of the show and it doesn't even have characters that it should, Lumpy Space Princess, and it just too small for the cost. I rather spend the money on the Beetles set.

Gravatar
By in Canada,

Lumpy Space Princess is the biggest casualty here by far, but it's acceptable. Still a day one buy for me! Interesting that so many commenters here aren't fans

Gravatar
By in Australia,

I'm with 13arm13 and thisisteekay, no Lemongrab or LSP? What the shell, man?
And to all those peeps hating on AT, you play with Lego yet don't watch awesomely absurd nostalgia inducing toons? You guys don't like fun!

Gravatar
By in United States,

I tried linking Adventure Time but it is not for me, so I won't be getting this set; but I am happy for all Adventure Time fans out there. I am though, a Big Bang Theory fan and grabbed the Ideas set as soon as I laid eyes on it... actually, that is the set that brought be back from my Dark Ages.

I will be getting the Dimensions' Adventure Time set because... well, minifigures :-)

Gravatar
By in United States,

I really like this set! I'm glad to see these figures are brick-built, I feel bad every time I get a set with a minifig because I know I'll never use it. However, something seems off about it. It's hard to believe this is nearly 500 parts, and I certainly wouldn't want to spend $45 on it, but I might change my mind when I see it in person

Gravatar
By in Australia,

Wow, what an ugly piece of junk. I thought brick-built figures were a thing of the distant past.

Gravatar
By in United States,

I tried to watch this cartoon with my daughter a few times and found we lost interest after only a couple minutes due to the weird, random, and tangential nature of the show. Although at this point seeing an upcoming set that I won't purchase is a bit of a relief since Lego is already making too many sets I want and can't afford. Can't wait for the Yellow Submarine though!

Gravatar
By in Germany,

@Aanchir: what, this show was nominated for awards, and even won some? Wtf? I have tried a few minutes on Youtube (the show is not available on free tv over here, thank god I might ad), and found it more than unbearable. Total utter crap. Showed it to my kids (4 and 8) and even they didn't like it the least.

And the set itself looks just as horrible. Freakish nightmare inducing figures. Who on earth thinks this is appropriate stuff for kids? Yuck! Shame on you Lego, especially considering the many great ideas projects that were rejected in recent times - for this! *fuming*

Gravatar
By in Canada,

I personally just don't see the appeal at least not yet. Sometimes seeing it in person can change ones mind. Part of my problem as others have mentioned is that I have no connection to the characters as I have never watched the show.

Gravatar
By in United States,

The show is extremely successful, so I'm sure they'll sell plenty. Some people will prefer the minifigs from LEGO Dimensions, but I think the brick-built characters capture their unique appearances better. I only hope this sells well enough that we can get a followup with some of the missing characters. (LSP and Flame Princess for sure, but there are so many others who would be great to see in brick form.)

Day one purchase for me.

Gravatar
By in United Kingdom,

The most artless, witless pile of dreck I have seen in years. A sin in LEGO, compounded by the painful thought that it didn't even spring from the submitter's own imagination but is based on some feeble corporate cartoon show that tries far too hard to be whacky.

The only possible redeeming feature of this sneckfest is that I can show it to Organ Bank Nº1 (who will be five years old next week) and honestly say to him: "you can do better than this guy."

"LEGO IDEAS" has now joined "Military Intelligence" at the top of the Contradictory Names League.

Gravatar
By in United States,

The grey ball joints are really starting to upset me.

Gravatar
By in United States,

Haters gunna hate.

Gravatar
By in New Zealand,

I know, right? Going though the comments it's really unclear whether people are being serious.

Gravatar
By in Germany,

I think those like myself who really hate this set (plus the fact that many other great Ideas sets in the review phase were rejected instead) are dead serious about their comments.

I guess the main reason for controversy is the fact that this is a show that seems to be
a) very successful in a few (admittedly important) markets like the US and some in Asia
b) almost unknown in many other markets, like Europe or the rest of the world
c) for those that have not known it for long and just tried it out, highly controversial

My personal opinion is that it is an awful show, not suitable for children at all. I can't fathom why anyone would find such utter crap the least bit appealing.
Same with this set. Of course it has to be attributed to the source material, but honestly, don't these characters look completely freakish and ghastly? Yesterday my wife happened to see the set pic on this page and she also immediately said "what on earth is that horrible thing?". Absoletely ghastly.

Perhaps it's because we are accustomed to more "traditional" kids tv shows. I mean even other "strange" stuff like Spongebob seems like Emmy-worthy material in comparison.

Gravatar
By in United Kingdom,

For anyone complaining that this set has a niche market; you are wrong. Adventure time actually has a massive following with fans of all ages. Just because you haven't seen it, doesn't mean it can't be popular.. Why can people not just accept this particular set isn't for them and let the intended market enjoy it instead of bashing it? I don't watch the show but I know of it and appreciate its a great representation of the source material and am pleased for the designer and all fans that are excited about it

Gravatar
By in United Kingdom,

@ T-Lars 06:28, brix 09:48,

You have the wrong end of the stick: it matters not whether we are fans of the show, but whether or not we are fans of the set.

I've analysed the previous fifty comments and noted the following:
Positive about show: 7
Negative about show: 6

However, when we look for opinions of the set itself, we have these figures:
Positive about aesthetics: 6
Negative about aesthetics: 12
Complaints of incompleteness: 7

In summary, we are not fans of the set.

Gravatar
By in Germany,

@brix: re: Why can people not just accept this particular set isn't for them and let the intended market enjoy it instead of bashing it?

I hate this set not just because I hate the show itself, but because this is a Lego Ideas set, where Lego has taken a conscious decision to manufacture this set instead of one of the other great ideas that were rejected during the review phase - for no apparent good reason.
No I see this shitty pile of crap and have to think all the time "why, Lego, why did you produce this nightmare set and got rid of those really good ones?" Still makes me mad now, just thinking about it.

THAT is the difference - for me. If it were just a new Lego line I don't care for, like Nexo Knights or Minecraft, I would just ignore it like I do with those themes. But here I was hoping for another great ideas set, and we got this instead. :-(

Gravatar
By in United Kingdom,

I've tried to bite my tongue (digitally) up until now but this thread has made me ashamed. Not ashamed to be a 37 year old Adventure Time fan, but ashamed to be a Lego fan alongside people who have nothing better to do than tear apart something they don't even care for in the first place.

My better half and myself have both watched and loved Adventure Time almost since it started. It's not something that can truly be enjoyed or even understood in 5 minute snippets on YouTube, or even just from watching the odd episode. It's a huge canvas with different characters that bring many different things to the show. It may look like a simple, daft kids show, but it's far from that. It's a show with heart and soul, that teaches kids (and adults) about life and death in a respectful way without talking down to them or over complicating things. Finn, the "last human" grows in real time. He gets a year older in the show each year, he suffers loss, heartache and betrayal, but has hope, happiness and is surrounded by the best of friends (mainly his brother Jake, who's parent adopted Finn as a baby but have died before the show started). Finn goes through the same motions we all did when he first falls in love and then has his heart broken, only difference being that he had a talking dog and walking games console to help him through it.

BMO, the simple looking games console, is such a fascinating character, who is neither male nor female but can identify as both, something many children go through these days. It's also heavily implied that two of the main female characters were once in a relationship together, but it's handled with such care that it's not rammed down peoples throats like a PSA, and no one in the show cares. Just like children they don't see colour, race, creed or sexuality. They care for each other as people (not all human), which is something a lot of adults could learn to do in this current hate filled political climate.

I could go on and on and on about how amazing AT is and how I am certainly going to show it to my future children when they are old enough so that they are taught decent morals and humanity in a way that appeals to them. The episode "Simon And Marcy" won awards for a reason, it's heartbreaking, exciting, scary and fun all at the same time (Spoilers: It explains the back story of the show's main antagonist and why he is like he is, set during the nuclear war the ruined earth and turned it into what you see in the future of Adventure time - Yes, AT is set in a post-apocalyptic future!)

Ultimately, if you don't like AT (or anything else) then it's simple: don't click the damn link and don't post pointless comments. Spend that time and energy on posting positive things about sets that do interest you, or at the very least post constructive criticism about sets you don't like in themes you do like! I can't stand The Big Bang Theory, so I ignored the posts, but I really hope that the fans of that show get a kick out of the BBT set as much as I do from Star Wars, Simpsons and Ghostbusters sets.

I'm still undecided on if I will get this new set. I love the show, and I quite like the look of the brick built figures for the most part, I'm just not sure they justify the price (probably 39.99-44.99 here in the UK at a guess).

Apologies for this turning into a rant, it just upsets me when people put so much effort into hating things that other people love. Ultimately, Lego is a children's toy and we are all adults who aren't afraid to let our inner child loose buying Lego.

In the immortal words of BMO him/herself:
"When bad things happen, I know you want to believe they are a joke, But sometimes life is scary and dark. That is why we must find the light."

Gravatar
By in United Kingdom,

Oh, and one more thing: remember, if you don't like this set then another one will come along soon that you probably do like. This isn't the last ever Lego set. It's not even the last ever Ideas set and probably won't be the last AT set. Ignore it, move along and wait for the next set that does excite you. People don't HAVE to buy every Lego set, Ideas or otherwise. If you feel you do then you are collecting not for the love of the brick, but because some OCD compels you to do so.

Gravatar
By in United Kingdom,

^"don't waste your time posting comments"
Wow you need to listen to your own advice.
Assault on hoth 2.0

Gravatar
By in Germany,

@midnighter1979: I always try to keep an open mind. And if you love AT, so be it. By now I have forced myself to watch the first seven episodes in order to find out if my first impression was wrong. Sorry to say but I still think that show is the crappiest piece of shite I have ever watched. And what you describe only confirms my initial suspicion that this show is completely unsuitable for children, at least smaller ones. One of mine said she got nightmares from what she had seen. Perhaps it was the German translation.

Gravatar
By in United Kingdom,

@AustonPowers I understand that maybe it just isn't to your taste, and like many cartoons it isn't suitable for younger children in some places (but then it's no scarier than Star Wars, Indiana Jones, Goonies or many other things I watched as a child). Like many shows it takes time to find it's feet and I don't think saying it's "the crappiest piece of shite" is very constructive in the slightest.

I'm disappointed that this is what Lego fandom has lowered itself to. I thought Transformers fandom was bad in the early 2000's, and even the Lego sub-reddit isn't this bad.

Enjoy your time hating things you don't care about guys, I'm going to enjoy my time with the things I do care about. As the terrible events in Nice have shown, life's too short.

Gravatar
By in United Kingdom,

^oh don't bring Nice into this. One minute silence begins now.

Gravatar
By in United Kingdom,

Wow, there's some real narcissism going on in here. Don't like it? Don't buy it. And let other people who do like it enjoy it.

Simple.

Gravatar
By in Spain,

@SigmundBjorn We have the right to complain about this utter crap, as several good Ideas sets have been rejected instead of this abomination, which is based on a show meant for kids but not suitable for them due to the innapropiate content, that makes you wonder where our good childhood have gone.
To sum up, I won't be buying this sh*t and try not to cry seeing it on shelves.

Gravatar
By in Germany,

@Drawback: thank you, my thoughts exactly.
@SigmundBjorn: what Drawback said.

Gravatar
By in Denmark,

I fully agree with SigmundBjorn, there are way too many narcissist haters on this otherwise excellent site.

This is a fan site - not a hate site.

Gravatar
By in Spain,

@bok2 So what, can't we say we dislike certain sets just because some people are offended and feel like having to defend this dull and lame set? No, thanks, we shall complain if we think LEGO products are bad, especially Ideas ones, if it wasn't due to the reason that this dumb set will appear instead of ones that would probably give far more playability than this one.
Personally, I don't like Adventure Time, I admit it, but even if it were another series I liked, I would still be dissapointed and furious, because LEGO can do much better than this.

@AustinPowers You're welcome mate, we shall keep strong against injustice :)

Edit: we're not saying you can't buy it, do as you wish if you want to burn money and support this type of sets from happening again in the future, we're expressing our dissapointment and anger with LEGO.

Gravatar
By in United States,

Easy must buy! Adventure Time is a ton of fun and a HUGE hit with kids. I'm loving all the "niche" comments by totally out-of-touch grown ups here. LOL.

Gravatar
By in Germany,

@cinemajay: you may think the US is the only market that counts, but it's a fact that over here in Germany it IS a niche, because practically no one watches/knows that show. There is no AT merchandise in shops, there is no huge AT fanbase. So much for out-of-touch. We have enough really good and highly popular kids tv shows over here, perhaps the tv stations just don't see the need for something like AT.

@bok2: Of course this is a fan site. But even as a Lego fan, do we have to love everything Lego puts out? I usually don't even comment on other Lego products I don't like, I just ignore them.
The fact that makes me (and I guess quite a few others) so very angry about this set is that it is a Lego ideas set, a line of sets with very few hand-picked subjects. And seeing all the comments that came about on this very site when the results of the various review phases were posted a while ago when it was shown what was rejected, I think there are many others (who don't want to comment) who are angry about Lego's choice. Especially as the subject matter is clearly quite controversial.
Just because it is a hit in the US doesn't mean it is a quality show. Come to think of it, a US show getting US awards doesn't mean anything anyway, especially if some of these awards are basically from within the industry, more or less giving the awards to themselves.
The fact that AT is almost completely unknown in other parts of the world shows that it is absolutely nothing of universal appeal. (Similar with many of the superhero sets, of which many don't even sell over here when they are heavily discounted). Believe it or not, not everything that is popular across the pond is popular over here also. And vice versa. And of course it doesn't have to or even should be. How boring would the world be if we all liked/loved the same things?

All that said, I will rest my case, ignore this set, and just remain unhappy that so many other great ideas that made it to 10.000 (and were feasible) were rejected for this.

Gravatar
By in {Unknown country},

@Drawback
"We have the right to complain about this utter crap, as several good Ideas sets have been rejected instead of this abomination,"

But... that's not how Ideas works. This set hasn't affected whether any others get accepted/rejected.

"which is based on a show meant for kids but not suitable for them due to the innapropiate content,"

Completely disagree with you.

Gravatar
By in Germany,

@Rebuild: I didn't want to comment on this subject anymore, but I have to reply to your false statement:

"But... that's not how Ideas works. This set hasn't affected whether any others get accepted/rejected."

Of course this set has affected the others in its review phase. Lego decided to reject the other seven projects instead of the AT one. Sure, some wouldn't have seen the light of day anyway, like Rivendell because of its immense size. But others like Indominus Rex, The Marshmallow Man, or Lego Physics could have indeed been chosen instead. Especially the latter would have really been something in the spirit of Lego ideas: no IP, a fresh idea, and something that Lego as yet has never done. Like the maze before.

And about the inappropriate content, we have to agree to disagree. I agree with Drawback, after having seen several episodes and witnessed the effects they have on children firsthand. Perhaps the French or English language version miraculously manages to not only completely change the ghastly dialogue but also the disturbing imagery that haunts kids even days after they have had to endure it. Honestly, what kind of human being can watch such stuff without having your stomach churned? It's completely ghastly. I'd really rather watch a horror movie, at least then the imagery matches the subject matter. AT from what you describe is supposed to be a kids tv series, but I have never seen anything as horrid that was called a kids tv series. Perhaps we have been watching two completely different shows, but from those Lego figures I guess it really is the same show.

By the way, I wanted to find out if my opinion was totally off, so I openly asked friends and colleagues what they thought of it. I didn't tell them my opinion beforehand obviously. After they had seen it, each and every one of them said they either absolutely hated it or didn't understand how anyone could find something like that appealing. Just for the record.

I never thought there could be a Lego set I hate. But really this is the first set I absolutely HATE. Everything about it.
I normally have no problem with Lego sets no matter what the subject matter or theme. The ones I don't like I just ignore, like it should be. But every time I see this one, I immediately get a hate reaction. I know you might think this is idiotic, but I really and honestly feel that way. And I stand by it. It is of course only my personal opinion, as is yours, but I have as much right to my opinion as you have to yours.
The big difference with this subject matter is just that I can't wrap my head around why anyone could find this even the least bit appealing, especially as a program suitable for kids. I really can't. I can with almost everything else, at least see some kind of possible redeeming features, but not with AT, sorry.

Perhaps you can tell me, what you or your kinds find appealing about it?
The freakish looking, nightmare inducing disfigured characters?
The incongruous and adult-oriented dialogue?
The fast-paced cuts and jumps in the story?
The unexplained twists for no apparent reason that make it hard to find a coherent plot?
The cheap looking animation?

Anything else?

No wonder with programs like these many kids nowadays have a hard time concentrating on something and show strange behavioral patterns that psychiologists around the world have been researching in recent years. Perhaps they should simply watch AT to find the answer.

Gravatar
By in Mexico,

Eh... The characters look kinda blocky to me (especially Finn), but the parts here are nice. Healthy selection of miscellaneous parts, like Unikitty tails and mixel joints, with good old fashioned System thrown in. However, the blocky style doesn't quite suit the characters here. Most, like BMO, Rainicorn, or Gunther, look pretty neat, but the more humanoid ones aren't as good. I'll have to check out other reviews on this to see if it suits me. For now, I'll wait for the Dimensions packs minifigures instead ^_^

Return to home page »