Two new Disney 100 sets revealed!
Posted by CapnRex101,
LEGO has officially announced two more Disney sets, celebrating the studio's 100th anniversary.
43215 The Enchanted Treehouse first emerged a couple of weeks ago, while 43221 100 Years of Disney Animation Icons has never been seen before and resembles DOTS, so I am glad that style has been preserved.
View images and pricing information below...
43215 The Enchanted Treehouse
- £149.99, $159.99 USD, €159.99, $209.99 CAD, $259.99 AUD
- Alice, Belle, Princess Jasmine, Mirabel, Moana, Mulan, Pocahontas, Raya, Tiana, Tinker Bell, Wendy, Anna, Elsa
Meet your favourite Disney heroines at The Enchanted Treehouse! This amazing LEGO | Disney set is ready for you to have a magical time exploring and going on endless adventures. Do some reading, take a canoe ride, dance, hone your warrior skills, search for hidden treasure – the list is endless! You can do anything you can imagine with 13 beloved characters in this incredible tree house!
Inspire kids aged 7 and up to new heights of imaginative play with this LEGO Disney The Enchanted Treehouse (43215) set. It has a 2-level tree house construction toy, waterfall, zip line, 13 LEGO mini-doll figures, plus lots of accessories and features to inspire play, including a cave hidden behind the waterfall and a secret staircase in the tree house. As they build, kids can enjoy an easy and intuitive adventure with the LEGO Builder app, zooming in and rotating models, and tracking progress.
This set sparks creative storytelling and helps grow kids’ confidence as they play with beloved characters. The set works for group play and can be added to other LEGO Disney sets (sold separately) for more fun.
This premium set is packed with characters, including Disney’s Mulan, Raya, Elsa, Moana, Tinker Bell, Alice, Wendy, Belle, Tiana, Anna, Pocahontas, Princess Jasmine and Mirabel, and makes a fun gift to impress Disney fans of any age.
- Open-ended fun – Give a Disney fan or any adventure-loving kid aged 7 and up a gift full of details to inspire the imagination with this LEGO Disney The Enchanted Treehouse (43215) set
- Unlimited play – The buildable toy set includes a 2-level tree house, a waterfall with slide and hidden cave, a zipline, hidden staircase, canoe, campfire and lots of other functions and accessories
- Screen heroines – Featuring LEGO mini-doll figures of Disney’s Mulan, Pocahontas, Raya, Moana, Tiana, Princess Jasmine, Mirabel, Elsa, Anna, Alice, Wendy, Tinker Bell and Belle for unlimited role-play fun
- A ‘wow’ gift for Disney Princess fans – Give this premium set as a creative treat for a child or group of kids aged 7+ that love well-known characters, adventure or building play
- Endless stories – The tree house model measures over 9.5 in. (25 cm) high, 14 in (36 cm) wide and 5 in. (13 cm) deep, and combines with the waterfall build to inspire hours of play
- A new way to build – Let the LEGO Builder app guide kids on an intuitive building adventure. They can save sets, track progress and zoom in and rotate models in 3D while they build
- Important life skills – With 13 LEGO mini-doll figures and 2 detailed builds, this Disney construction set fosters creative play, helping to build vital life skills through fun
43221 100 Years of Disney Animation Icons
- £49.99, $59.99 USD, €54.99, $79.99 CAD, $89.99 AUD
- Mickey Mouse
Show off your creativity and your favourite Disney characters! This imaginative LEGO Disney set lets you pick the characters you love and create a collage to display on your wall. It includes 72 icons, 12 of which can be built at once. You can also create another icon to set in a small desk frame and display – along with an exclusive Disney’s Mickey Mouse artist minifigure – wherever you like!
Captivate fans and kids aged 6 and up and inspire Disney decoration creativity with this LEGO Disney 100 Years of Disney Animation Icons (43221) set. The set features 12 8x8 plates, picture frame and hanger elements, and loads of tiles to build up to 12 icons at once, plus an exclusive Disney’s Mickey Mouse minifigure and building instructions with extra inspiration. As they build, kids can also enjoy an easy and intuitive adventure with the LEGO Builder app. They can zoom in and rotate models in 3D, save sets and track their progress.
This Disney wall art decor set helps boost kids’ creativity and ingenuity as they create and display favourite characters in picture form. It’s also great for group play and can be added to similar LEGO | Disney sets (sold separately) to expand the art display. This premium kit is packed with possibilities and makes a fun gift that everyone will be talking about.
- Creative joy – Give a fan or any kid aged 6 and up who loves Disney creations a gift to inspire the imagination with this LEGO Disney 100 Years of Disney Animation Icons (43221) set
- Unlimited fun – The set has 12 8x8 plates, picture frame elements, loads of tiles to create a full collection at once and an instruction booklet with 72 Disney designs sorted into 6 collections of 12
- Exclusive addition – This kit includes a Disney’s Mickey Mouse minifigure with a torso and legs decorated exclusively for this set, holding a brush and palette
- Unique Disney gift – Give this premium wall art set as a creative birthday present to kids, family or friends with a passion for Disney characters, art and design
- Disney decoration – The framed collage with hanger measures over 11 in. (28 cm) high and 12.5 in (32 cm) wide. It’s easy to swap icons in and out of this fun wall display to mix it up at any time
- A new way to build – Let the LEGO Builder app guide kids on an intuitive building adventure. They can save sets, track progress and zoom in and rotate models in 3D while they build
- Important life skills – With 72 icon designs included in the booklet, this Disney buildable kit fosters creative play, helping to encourage and build vital life skills through fun
The release date has yet to be confirmed, but we will update this article once we know.
Are you looking forward to these Disney sets? Let us know in the comments.
67 likes
54 comments on this article
In what world is 43215 $60 USD... BUT $260 IN AUSTRALIA?!!
I won't lie though, the icons look kind of cute. I might pick them, but what I really need to know is whether the bottom centre one in the last image is Genie or Perry the Platypus...
@RaiderOfTheLostBrick said:
"In what world is 43215 $60 USD... BUT $260 IN AUSTRALIA?!!
I won't lie though, the icons look kind of cute. I might pick them, but what I really need to know is whether the bottom centre one in the last image is Genie or Perry the Platypus..."
Its the sword in the stone.
@RaiderOfTheLostBrick said:
"In what world is 43215 $60 USD... BUT $260 IN AUSTRALIA?!!
I won't lie though, the icons look kind of cute. I might pick them, but what I really need to know is whether the bottom centre one in the last image is Genie or Perry the Platypus..."
That must be a typo in the USD, and should have read 159.99 USD.
Awwww I knew 43215 would be expensive but boy that's a lot. My daughter would love it though, a magic tree house with all the cool "princesses". Aaarggh to buy or not to buy that is the question :D
The icons is really cool too, and it can totally expand beyond the 72 examples, very Lego-y !
That's a lot of minidolls. Even some we haven't had 100 times in the Princesses range too! It's probably the most female characters in a set ever. The building itself looks nice, if a little washed out. Reminds me of Elves, which is always good!
If The Enchanted Treehouse were minifigures it would be an instant purchase, as they are minidolls it is an instant avoid.
Seems like Lego keep making bad decisions, The Little Mermaid set is based off of the live-action movie, not the classic animation, and the Treehouse seems like a continuum of the Disney Princesses themes instead of a set with universal appeal.
Kinda want to get that icons set just to make figment , assuming it has enough lavender parts
I think 43221 100 Years of Disney Animation Icons is a really cool idea! It doesn't fit in with my collection, so on the fence on whether I'll pick it up.
Well, the price certainly is premium. I wish the build was. The mindolls look great, but my daughter will just have to stick to Friends.
No interest in the round footed monsters, but the Animation Icons look pretty cute, so I shall definitely pick that one up. Maybe even 2 or 3!
Icons look great, and 72 designs to make is a nice bonus (plus should have ample colours for your own designs I imagine). That’s a win.
Lego lists release date as 1st June.
@johleth said:
" @RaiderOfTheLostBrick said:
"In what world is 43215 $60 USD... BUT $260 IN AUSTRALIA?!!
I won't lie though, the icons look kind of cute. I might pick them, but what I really need to know is whether the bottom centre one in the last image is Genie or Perry the Platypus..."
Its the sword in the stone."
In the anvil, even!
I would never get it though; you must be well-read in the way of disneys movies
Okay, first one is nice play set for girls.
So... do we expect now some kind of house filled with minifigures of: Peter Pan, Captain Hook, Aladin, Hunchback of Notre Dame, Mowgli and Baloo, Goofy with his son, Hercules?
You know, some great set with legendary male heroes. :)
The Enchanted Treehouse is perfect!
Did they change the style for minidoll's face? Looks kind of different.
@MegaBlocks: There is no such thing as "a set with universal appeal." You may not like minidolls, but there's a reason Friends celebrated its tenth anniversary last year, as people who are not you (such as myself, who's bought sets from every minidoll theme) like or even love them.
Unlimited fun*. *Limited to 12 at once.
Exclusive addition - yes, we've put a single exclusive minifigure into the set to convince you to buy it.
A new way to build - get your kids back on their ipads, at least until we stop supporting the app.
Important life skills – sign your child's life over to Disney.
I kinda like the design of 43215 but even with all those minidolls, how on god's green earth is that a £150 set?? Only just over 1000 pieces... absolutely daylight robbery. I'm sure it'll sell well though...
@RaiderOfTheLostBrick said:
"In what world is 43215 $60 USD... BUT $260 IN AUSTRALIA?!!
"
It's $160 , not $60, current exchange rates make €160 = $261 AUD , or $160 US = $238 AUD
Still overpriced, but I guess they do the Premium Disney rate for the amount of dolls in it.
@sirventricle said:
"I kinda like the design of 43215 but even with all those minidolls, how on god's green earth is that a £150 set?? Only just over 1000 pieces... absolutely daylight robbery. I'm sure it'll sell well though..."
Yeah just seen the piece count, 1016 according to New Elementary. That's some Disney Tax ??
@MegaBlocks said:
"If The Enchanted Treehouse were minifigures it would be an instant purchase, as they are minidolls it is an instant avoid.
Seems like Lego keep making bad decisions, The Little Mermaid set is based off of the live-action movie, not the classic animation, and the Treehouse seems like a continuum of the Disney Princesses themes instead of a set with universal appeal.]
I would wager that Disney required Lego to make the little mermaid set based on the movie."
@Waksplat said:
" @sirventricle said:
"I kinda like the design of 43215 but even with all those minidolls, how on god's green earth is that a £150 set?? Only just over 1000 pieces... absolutely daylight robbery. I'm sure it'll sell well though..."
Yeah just seen the piece count, 1016 according to New Elementary. That's some Disney Tax ??"
Seems "normal" for disney princess castles in the recent years :
43211 : Aurora's Castle $45 for 187 (24.1c ppp)
43206 : Cinderella and Prince Charming's Castle $90 for 365 (24.7c ppp)
43219 : Disney Princess Creative Castles $35 for 140 (25c ppp)
This set does have a much larger amount of pieces & characters.
Relative to the other sets it's cheaper in the sense of piece count/dolls, but yes the starting price is certainly much higher.
The top center tile on the legends of animation set looks like Feathers McGraw from WALLACE AND GROMIT.
I can’t unsee it to the extent that my brain can’t figure out who it is SUPPOSED to be.
ADDENDUM: oh, it’s Olaf from COLD LADY and COLD LADY 2
@RaiderOfTheLostBrick said:
"In what world is 43215 $60 USD... BUT $260 IN AUSTRALIA?!!
I won't lie though, the icons look kind of cute. I might pick them, but what I really need to know is whether the bottom centre one in the last image is Genie or Perry the Platypus..."
Bottom middle would be The Sword in the Stone.
@Ridgeheart said:
" @MegaBlocks said:
"If The Enchanted Treehouse were minifigures it would be an instant purchase, as they are minidolls it is an instant avoid.
Seems like Lego keep making bad decisions, The Little Mermaid set is based off of the live-action movie, not the classic animation, and the Treehouse seems like a continuum of the Disney Princesses themes instead of a set with universal appeal."
@Ridgeheart translates this as:
"I don't like this, and I am unable to envision a world where other people might. I am unable to empathise with the target audience, and what's worse, I don't see the problem with this. I assume that every set that exists should appeal to me and me alone, because that is what I define as 'universally appealing'; it ought to appeal to my personal universe of one.
I strongly imply that the live-action movie of the Little Mermaid is inferior to the version that I view through my nostalgia-goggles, and I might well be unaware that the original story is centuries old, in itself a retelling of a retelling of a retelling of a retelling; that the original Little Mermaid was green-skinned, that she died a horrible death at the end of the original story, and that her entire story may well have been an allegory for Hans Christian Andersen's own struggles with his sexual identity.
If I even bothered to read this ridiculous wall of text I will vehemently deny any and all of this, and though I wish awful Ridgeheart wouldn't single me out like this, I will remain unaware that I am but one of many people who would do well to remove their heads from their sphincters, and that I serve as nothing more but an exemplar. I will likely immediately block Ridgeheart's posts after this, and retreat to my echo-chamber, although I will take with me a tiny gnawing spark that might grow into something bigger. Some day, I might emerge from my echo-chamber a better, more open-minded, more balanced person, and my evolution will be complete."
I don't really mind these sets. They're not for me, but that's okay."
Hahaha, brilliant!!
SO true!
Amazing how many people think THEIR world view is the ONLY one!….
So, the "Icons" set is basically a pre-packaged version of the mosaic wall which is a popular feature at AFOL conventions? Hybridized with the "Brick Sketches" theme because some of the characters are several layers deep. Also, it looks like the first example of the "terminating the Dots theme, but integrating the tile/mosaic play-pattern into other themes" decision from a few months ago.
Apart from the hanging frame, you can probably replicate the experience by combining several Dots sets and drawing up your own plans. Hmm -- I sometimes run LEGO-based activities at a local science fiction convention, and if I adapted the idea with additional character designs (super heroes and Starfleet uniforms are also recognizable at low-res because of their bold color blocking), it would make a nicely quiet "quilting bee"-style activity.
That treehouse looks really good! It looks like 3 new characters make their minidoll debut. As others have said, if it were minifigs, more AFOLs would buy it. However, this is a set made for young girls. I love seeing the recolors as well...I miss Elves.
@RaiderOfTheLostBrick said:
"In what world is 43215 $60 USD... BUT $260 IN AUSTRALIA?!!
I won't lie though, the icons look kind of cute. I might pick them, but what I really need to know is whether the bottom centre one in the last image is Genie or Perry the Platypus..."
I think that bottom center in the last image is the Sword in the Stone.
The price on 43215 is a bit high. I'd argue it should be about $130, factoring in the number of minidolls and the presence of some larger molded pieces like the slide and rock pieces along with the cost of the Disney license.
I want the Animation Icons set! It’s great and very clever!
@Ridgeheart said:
" @MegaBlocks said:
"If The Enchanted Treehouse were minifigures it would be an instant purchase, as they are minidolls it is an instant avoid.
Seems like Lego keep making bad decisions, The Little Mermaid set is based off of the live-action movie, not the classic animation, and the Treehouse seems like a continuum of the Disney Princesses themes instead of a set with universal appeal."
@Ridgeheart translates this as:
"I don't like this, and I am unable to envision a world where other people might. I am unable to empathise with the target audience, and what's worse, I don't see the problem with this. I assume that every set that exists should appeal to me and me alone, because that is what I define as 'universally appealing'; it ought to appeal to my personal universe of one.
I strongly imply that the live-action movie of the Little Mermaid is inferior to the version that I view through my nostalgia-goggles, and I might well be unaware that the original story is centuries old, in itself a retelling of a retelling of a retelling of a retelling; that the original Little Mermaid was green-skinned, that she died a horrible death at the end of the original story, and that her entire story may well have been an allegory for Hans Christian Andersen's own struggles with his sexual identity.
If I even bothered to read this ridiculous wall of text I will vehemently deny any and all of this, and though I wish awful Ridgeheart wouldn't single me out like this, I will remain unaware that I am but one of many people who would do well to remove their heads from their sphincters, and that I serve as nothing more but an exemplar. I will likely immediately block Ridgeheart's posts after this, and retreat to my echo-chamber, although I will take with me a tiny gnawing spark that might grow into something bigger. Some day, I might emerge from my echo-chamber a better, more open-minded, more balanced person, and my evolution will be complete."
I don't really mind these sets. They're not for me, but that's okay."
Genius
Back when I saw the leaked image of 43215 The Enchanted Treehouse, I thought there was about a 50% chance that it was fake because surely no set would actually have *that many* princesses.
Nothing I would buy, but I'm sure the instructions for 43221 will have some interesting ideas.
@Ridgeheart said:
" @Ridgeheart translates this as:
I don't like this, and I am unable to envision a world where other people might. I am unable to empathise with the target audience, ...."
I translate this as, "I can't actually address any of your criticisms, so I am just going to resort to a childish ad hominem lecture directed towards someone I know nothing about, and provide a perfect example of why the block feature now exists on Brickset"
I wish I could understand what happened to the discourse on this site. Is it the explosion of Lego fans during the last three years? The general drop in civility online? Is it really that hard for people to disagree without being pointlessly nasty?
It's amazing the variety of recognizable things the quarter-circle tiles and other tiles can create. Very cool. The princess battle pack looks pretty great, too, but I guess we'll have to see if the kiddos want to save up that much money for it.
My major problem with the Enchanted Treehouse is--where's the tree?
Other "treehouse" sets generally have at least a vague indication of the tree that's integral to the eponymous structure. And because this one is enchanted, building a suitable tree around it requires IMO colors not usually supplied in such other treehouse sets as Pooh's house, or the giant Ideas treehouse, or the Ewok Village. I suppose I would have to consult Bricklink for appropriate recolors of the pieces used in those other sets. (Elves might be a good source? Actually, this starts to sound like fun. Perhaps I will buy the set after all!)
The Icons set, while not particularly original, does look very enjoyable. That, for certain, joins my wantlist.
@Ridgeheart said:
" @MegaBlocks said:
"If The Enchanted Treehouse were minifigures it would be an instant purchase, as they are minidolls it is an instant avoid.
I don't really mind these sets. They're not for me, but that's okay."
And that's why I'll be avoiding it.
Minidolls have no compatibility with any other Lego themes. I'd happily buy a set with minifigures and criticise those who were disappointed that they weren't minidolls."
I’m thinking of getting the Icons set and only building the Pixar characters. If I have a couple leftover squares, I may add Wallace & Gromit. If I have only one, or 3+, I’ll probably see if I can do a convincing Darth Mickey.
Is 43221 using flesh-toned tiles (like minifigs) rather than tan (like BrickHeadz)?
@MLF said:
"
I wish I could understand what happened to the discourse on this site. Is it the explosion of Lego fans during the last three years? The general drop in civility online? Is it really that hard for people to disagree without being pointlessly nasty?"
I'm thinking there must be some other history between them. The original comment seemed essentially to say, "I like the ideas behind the sets, but the specific choices like using minidolls or source material make them unappealing." I don't understand the mental leap that takes that comment as an assumed stance for all AFOL.
Personally, I am frustrated with the unnecessary minifig in the Animation icons. There is no ladder or scaffolding, so it's not like I can pretend it's a play set of Mickey painting art on a billboard. Rather, it is clearly an add-on to get minifig collectors interested in buying the set.
"72 Disney designs sorted into 6 collections of 12"
Now granted, you could also make your own custom designs, but I'm curious what all of these 72 designs are. Just about all the samples are pulled from Micky Mouse cartoons and Disney Princess films, with a handful of their other theatrical animations thrown in. Sword in the Stone being there gives me hope they've got a few deep cuts. I hope Pixar and their television series get some love too. If they've got official designs for Bill Cipher and Amity Blight I'm sold!
@MLF said:
"Nothing I would buy, but I'm sure the instructions for 43221 will have some interesting ideas.
@Ridgeheart said:
" @Ridgeheart translates this as:
I don't like this, and I am unable to envision a world where other people might. I am unable to empathise with the target audience, ...."
I translate this as, "I can't actually address any of your criticisms, so I am just going to resort to a childish ad hominem lecture directed towards someone I know nothing about, and provide a perfect example of why the block feature now exists on Brickset"
I wish I could understand what happened to the discourse on this site. Is it the explosion of Lego fans during the last three years? The general drop in civility online? Is it really that hard for people to disagree without being pointlessly nasty?"
Who is nasty? Not Ridgeheart.
I am tired of people using Lego comments to insult groups of people that don't look or act like them. You can dislike a set but stop disparaging large groups of people while doing it. That is what megablocks and the like are doing. Gate keeping so that Lego is only for them and those like them.
You won't buy these sets because of minidolls.
I won't buy these sets because I can't sell my one remaining kidney to afford them.
We are not the same.
@GSR_MataNui said:
""72 Disney designs sorted into 6 collections of 12"
Now granted, you could also make your own custom designs, but I'm curious what all of these 72 designs are. Just about all the samples are pulled from Micky Mouse cartoons and Disney Princess films, with a handful of their other theatrical animations thrown in. Sword in the Stone being there gives me hope they've got a few deep cuts. I hope Pixar and their television series get some love too. If they've got official designs for Bill Cipher and Amity Blight I'm sold! "
Sword in the Stone you say? I wonder if anything from Black Cauldron, Rescuers, and / or Artistocats would be doable. Not sure what they would be, but it would be nice to spread the love.
Also, some red-white-blue stripes with a 53 in front would do well for Herbie / The Love Bug.
@dcs34 said:
"Is 43221 using flesh-toned tiles (like minifigs) rather than tan (like BrickHeadz)?"
Yes, that color has been in more sets recently, especially after 10297: Boutique Hotel and 31131: Downtown Noodle Shop had walls in that color as well.
The treehouse brings the memory of Elves alive, it’s bittersweet, makes me miss Elves even more!
The comment to the first reveal of the treehouse, calling it “a princess battlepack” still gives me joy.
I won’t buy it as I have no use for the washed out colours, but I’m quite sure my nieces would go into a state of pure ecstatic joy if it happened to fall into their hands!
@Briczk said:
"Okay, first one is nice play set for girls.
So... do we expect now some kind of house filled with minifigures of: Peter Pan, Captain Hook, Aladin, Hunchback of Notre Dame, Mowgli and Baloo, Goofy with his son, Hercules?
You know, some great set with legendary male heroes. :)"
I was thinking along the same lines. When was the last time we had a LEGO set with 13 male figures but no female ones? I imagine that if such a set were launched today, there would be an outcry. I suppose to paraphrase Orwell ‘All LEGO figures are equal but some are more equal than others.’
Logging in for the first time in a long time to say @Ridgeheart you’re a real one
@zander ah yes, because those two scenarios are historically, socially, or ethically comparable… you anti-feminists have been crying about female supremacy for decades now and I’m still waiting
i would actually want the enchanted forest one if they were figs and not minidolls, i would be considering getting it. i hate the minidolls style and i'd kill for a lot of these characters in minifig form (including anna and elsa, they only have their frozen 1 outfits in fig form). it's really a shame
@Zander:
Name one minifig-based theme that has gender parity, or that is weighted more in favor of female minifigs. For purposes of this exercise, Cuusoo/Ideas shall be treated as one theme, any variant of Ghostbusters as one theme, and Dimensions as one theme.
Look back to the 90’s, and most non-Town sub-themes had one single female (if that), and she was usually restricted to the most expensive set in that wave. CMF launched with a 7:1 gender ratio, and has only in the last few years managed to _occassionally_ reach a 1:1 ratio for an individual series (excluding Looney Tunes and Muppets, which backslid almost to the same ratio as S1-2. With the German soccer wave, there wasn’t even a single female in the group.
Besides, this is minidolls. Minidoll themes simply flip the gender disparity in reverse. Oh, and 3425 (and 3425-2) is the set you’re looking for. 22 minifigs, all male. 6075/375-2 has 14 male soldiers. 9365, 13 males.
I will buy the art one in a heartbeat.
The other one is pretty cool too, and even though I’m more of a minifig fan it’s nice to see so many characters in one set.
@PurpleDave said:
"Besides, this is minidolls. Minidoll themes simply flip the gender disparity in reverse. Oh, and 3425 (and 3425-2) is the set you’re looking for. 22 minifigs, all male. 6075/375-2 has 14 male soldiers. 9365, 13 males."
What makes those minifigures all male? Classic smiley faces can be male or female, and there is typically nothing on the torsos that indicates they must be male only. Assigning gender to those figures as all male is down to personal and societal biases, in that "they are male jobs so the figures must be male". Now LEGO puts male/female specifics on faces or torsos, differences are more obvious but back then there should not have been any reason to say this is definitely male or female, it is all down to bias of the observer.
Having all females in a Disney Princess set makes sense due to the license. Disney Princess concentrates on female only characters, it is a Disney property that markets female characters to (mainly) girls. There is nothing LEGO can do about gender balance within the Disney Princess theme, aside from not doing Disney Princess.
@MBUK:
Historically, European-style soldiers from that era were 100% male, but then you’re got people like Joan of Arc. The heads were all basic smileys at the time, so I can concede that point on the Yellow Castle. The Soccer sets, however, feature facial hair on some of the minifigs, and a complete lack of female-eyes at a time when that was a universal signal for “female minifig”. They’re also all players on a national soccer team, which doesn’t have a mixed-gender division. Additionally, any real players featured on the box were all male (remember, at this point in history, the USWNT was the sole women’s team that was competitive, thanks to Title IX in the US making soccer appealing as a girl’s sport). I’m gonna have to stand by the other three sets being 100% male.