LEGO Ideas 21362 Mineral Collection announced!
Posted by CapnRex101,
LEGO Ideas sets are being announced at an unprecedented rate, as mere days after 21361 Gremlins: Gizmo was revealed, here is the press release for 21362 Mineral Collection!
21362 Mineral Collection
880 pieces, rated 18+
$59.99 / £54.99 / €59.99
Available at LEGO.com from 1st October and for pre-order now
Showcase the vibrant colours of minerals with the LEGO Ideas Mineral Collection (21362) building set for adults. A wonderful gift for rock collectors and nature lovers, this collectable set features brick-built models of 6 minerals and buildable display shelf units to create eye-catching living room decor.
Use clever building techniques and transparent LEGO bricks to create models of golden pyrite, purple amethyst, blue fluorite, watermelon tourmaline, reddish-pink rhodochrosite and tangerine quartz.
Assemble the 3 freestanding shelving units and attach your creations to the shelves. Arrange the units as you wish and swap the minerals to different shelves to change up your display.
Here is the original Ideas submission, created by DDF72, for comparison with the official model:
Are you happy with the minerals and how they are presented in this set? Let us know in the comments and via our poll.
93 likes
99 comments on this article
Jesus Christ Marie! They're Minerals!
Perfect execution and... not overpriced? That Disney tax is out of control! This looks wonderful.
Needs a Rock Raiders minifig.
I have had "doorbust the f'ing lego store" on my calendar for October 1 for months, with no idea why I put it there. Now I know :)
@EtudeTheBadger said:
"Needs a Rock Raiders minifig."
I feel like if I ever get these and put them on display I’m going to have to dig out one of those old rock monsters from that theme to have with them
As this contains no recognizable IP, I cannot allow myself to buy it—out of principle of course.
:)
They had to change some of the minerals:(
I'm not sure how accurate either rendition is but I prefer the amethyst of the original submission - the dark bluish grey surround it now has looks a bit like a overbearing frame and it detracts from the other samples in my opinion.
Looks nice, but for me this would mainly be a transparent parts pack
This is possibly one of the only "objects" sets where the model is cheaper than the real thing. But to me, they don't look great compared to the real thing.
It is a shame that neither the original designer nor LEGO thought of including tiles with the names of the minerals on them.
18+ version of 11040 Magical Transparent Box
These are some crystal gems. They might just save the day.
@EtudeTheBadger said:
"Needs a Rock Raiders minifig."
Well I know what I'm doing next time I find one in a bin buy.
I voted for this set, I was delighted when it hit 10k, even more pleased when it was selected, and am now quite thoroughly over the moon at its final form. Here’s hoping I can pick it up at some point.
I like that it includes shelving.
@EtudeTheBadger said:
"Needs a Rock Raiders minifig."
An energy crystal has been found.
Maybe I’m being too harsh but I think the level of accuracy is below what Lego is capable of producing these days, and the gems looked better in the original submission. It’s also clearly intended as a display piece, but like someone else commented, omits the name plaques for some reason which would have gone a long way into making this more presentable.
This has got to be the dullest set ever...
That’s a quartz no from me.
@damien said:
"This has got to be the dullest set ever..."
"I love collecting rocks, but I don't like to go outside so now I collect plastic on demand rocks."
I mean to some degree I understand the demand and popularity for botanicals, I feel this is a attempt at feeling how warm the water is to expanding this theme.
I can't wrap my head around how the gold is being constructed. Both frontal cubes are new pieces?
I got a rock.
Wow! A ruri no houseki Lego set - I thought that anime would be too niche to get anything...
@ZeroGravitas said:
"Wow! A ruri no houseki Lego set - I thought that anime would be too niche to get anything..."
Haha! My thoughts exactly!
(Does lack a Nagi minifig though....I bet her shapes would be too challenging for the moulding machines.....)
OT: looks pretty decent, both in execution and price! I do like the original design of the minerals a bit more, but they will have had their reasons to change it, and at least didn't mess it up this time.
But most of it I like that this for once is what Ideas should be all about. Not just another IP, not a variation of stuff that Lego could make themselves. but something truly original.
Very nice set, and great use of the many transparent bricks that exist.
You know, I'm not so keen on minerals but this looks kind of decent. However, I have a LOT of transparent pieces lying around, so I can probably build stuff like this from my collection.
For the first time in my life, I feel that a LEGO set is actually boring.
@FlatSixLego said:
"I can't wrap my head around how the gold is being constructed. Both frontal cubes are new pieces?"
They are Minecraft heads.
For the price, they are a bit sparse looking to me.
Ah great, another overpriced $100 Ideas set and... Wait, it's only $60? In this economy???
Okay.... really don't see the point in this. Plastic Flowers with Botanicals I get as its something that has a temporary existence rendered in a permanent medium... But making a sculpture of a rock? Admittedly if you wanted to buy real world examples of these minerals it'd cost you more... But I don't get any appeal over the real thing.
I like it! I'll pick one up when I see it out in the wild.
We need Bert and his plethora of geology jokes.
Now excuse me, I've got to listen to some rock music...
:-)
I don't know about the minerals but the stands look great. I think I may copy them.
Looks brilliant. Stunning display set. No pointless minifigures, no pointless play features. Perfect.
I'm withholding judgment on this set until my geologist brother can weigh in.
@iwybs said:
"I'm withholding judgment on this set until my geologist brother can weigh in."
"Solid foundations. Many-faceted builds. Brilliant display. It rocks me to my very core."
If this was a display piece at Brickfair, I'd think it's pretty neat.
As a product, very bland.
@FlatSixLego said:
" @damien said:
"This has got to be the dullest set ever..."
"I love collecting rocks, but I don't like to go outside so now I collect plastic on demand rocks."
I mean to some degree I understand the demand and popularity for botanicals, I feel this is a attempt at feeling how warm the water is to expanding this theme.
I can't wrap my head around how the gold is being constructed. Both frontal cubes are new pieces?"
I think they are minecraft heads.
I didn’t realise one could swap the minerals to different shelves to change up ones display.
Then I read this:
“swap the minerals to different shelves to change up your display“
Nice.
@FlatSixLego said:
" @damien said:
"This has got to be the dullest set ever..."
"I love collecting rocks, but I don't like to go outside so now I collect plastic on demand rocks."
I mean to some degree I understand the demand and popularity for botanicals, I feel this is a attempt at feeling how warm the water is to expanding this theme.
I can't wrap my head around how the gold is being constructed. Both frontal cubes are new pieces?"
*Fool's gold (pyrite) - doubly so fool's gold because it's not even pyrite, it's plastic
Huge amount of play features in this set: there are 720 combinations of putting the six different pieces of rock on the six places available for them. And if you go crazy and totally outside the box, you can put them completely elsewhere and then the possibilities are endless...
They've improved on the original, but it's still a set that I will pass on.
A souless set.
@HOBBES said:
"Huge amount of play features in this set: there are 720 combinations of putting the six different pieces of rock on the six places available for them. And if you go crazy and totally outside the box, you can put them completely elsewhere and then the possibilities are endless..."
Brilliant. You should apply to join the LEGO copywriting team.
The pyrite, amethyst geode, and tangerine quartz look pretty much like what they're supposed to be.
The rhodochrosite is shaped right, but the color is a bit off - it should be more pinkish. I think if Lego did a trans red core faced with trans pink tiles, that would get closer to the actual mineral's color.
The blue fluorite is blue, but it doesn't look much like typical fluorite. Fluorite usually has a cubic habit, so this should be shaped more like the pyrite and rhodochrosite. Fluorite can be octahedral, so I guess this is supposed to be a massive octahedral sample.
The "watermelon" tourmaline is tourmaline-shaped, but it sure isn't watermelon. That variety is red or pink in the center with green edges, like an actual watermelon. This one is yellow or orange at the core, with colorless edges.
@Somnium said:
"A souless set. "
This seems cruel to say about any Lego set but especially so about one created by a fellow fan. Somebody put hard work into representing one of their interests in Lego just for someone like you to call it "soulless".
@yellowcastle said:
"I got a rock."
You blockhead!
@AustinPowers said:"
We need Bert and his plethora of geology jokes.
Now excuse me, I've got to listen to some rock music...
:-) "
Bert was in another set. And while I like this, I don't have the space for it, so 10334 will have to do me for my rock music needs. (Seriously, I tried out the "hide your smartphone and play music" feature by playing Chuck Berry's Greatest Hits.)
Looks great. Love the windows on the shelving.
@Crux said:
" @iwybs said:
"I'm withholding judgment on this set until my geologist brother can weigh in."
"Solid foundations. Many-faceted builds. Brilliant display. It rocks me to my very core.""
They definitely mined the depths of creativity for this one, that much is crystal clear.
I preferred the geode in the original submission (at least, that's what I thought it was) but otherwise I think this is very successful--and a reasonable price as well! (Also a great transparent parts pack, if I can ever persuade myself to disassemble it!)
@danieltheo said:
"I'm not sure how accurate either rendition is but I prefer the amethyst of the original submission - the dark bluish grey surround it now has looks a bit like a overbearing frame and it detracts from the other samples in my opinion."
I don't know if it is more accurate than the submission, but it looks to me like they were trying to mimic the minifig scale geode part, Bricklink ID 49656pb02.
Hank will be very happy
Love this set and I like that the geode mimics the actual LEGO brick, but I wish we also got an up-scaled version of the classic crystal piece here!
@Lyichir said:
" @Somnium said:
"A souless set. "
This seems cruel to say about any Lego set but especially so about one created by a fellow fan. Somebody put hard work into representing one of their interests in Lego just for someone like you to call it "soulless"."
Agreed, it is very cruel and saying so is a very harsh way to critique a set that could express severe disappointment and dislike, even.
This set is soulless.
@tedgarb said:
"I have had "doorbust the f'ing lego store" on my calendar for October 1 for months, with no idea why I put it there. Now I know :)"
I want on to my calendar and realized that New ninjago has been around for longer than Old ninjago, pre-redesign in s8!
@GBP_Chris said:
"This set is soulless."
Still not as soulless as as how the Jazz Quartett ended up. Not even close. At least this set rocks!
I'd bite if it had a Power Miners or Rock Raiders connection.
@GBP_Chris said:
" @Lyichir said:
" @Somnium said:
"A souless set. "
This seems cruel to say about any Lego set but especially so about one created by a fellow fan. Somebody put hard work into representing one of their interests in Lego just for someone like you to call it "soulless"."
Agreed, it is very cruel and saying so is a very harsh way to critique a set that could express severe disappointment and dislike, even.
This set is soulless."
I thought maybe I could appeal to people's better nature and suggest voicing their critiques in a way that didn't insult the work and creativity of their fellow builders, but maybe the truly soulless ones are the Lego fans who don't have any empathy or consideration for other people's passion even if it isn't subject matter they personally share an interest in.
Peak. I'm surprised the poll has a majority of "No, it doesn't interest me'.
I'm sorry, but I'm feeling that these are pretty underwhelming. The blue fluorite looks good, and the purple amethyst geode is okay, but the other builds just seem rather bland to me. It's just some stacked transparent bricks for the most part. IMO it doesn't have the same appeal as many of the botanical flower sets.
I think a mineral collection is fun, but I have no desire for a Lego made one, sorry. :(
It’s pretty crystal clear that this set rocks!
Rocks!
If it had a single chrome crystal I'd buy 15 of these sets, but you're not getting any of my money lego. Missed opportunity.
I like this set a lot, only one thing I would change. Instead of having shelving, they should've made some of them bigger. And while we're at it I'd buy a much bigger version of amethyst, rhodochrosite and fluorite.
@damien said:
"This has got to be the dullest set ever..."
The pyrite is actually quite shiny.
@Maxbricks14 said:
"Peak. I'm surprised the poll has a majority of "No, it doesn't interest me'."
I am very surprised by that, too. Although, I selected on the poll "yes, buying it, if it is discounted". This is a beautiful set. Very well done! I was impressed by the orginal and this official set from TLG is more so impressive. (I'm thinking of the Vader quote as I write this.)
@Lyichir said:
" @GBP_Chris said:
" @Lyichir said:
" @Somnium said:
"A souless set. "
This seems cruel to say about any Lego set but especially so about one created by a fellow fan. Somebody put hard work into representing one of their interests in Lego just for someone like you to call it "soulless"."
Agreed, it is very cruel and saying so is a very harsh way to critique a set that could express severe disappointment and dislike, even.
This set is soulless."
I thought maybe I could appeal to people's better nature and suggest voicing their critiques in a way that didn't insult the work and creativity of their fellow builders, but maybe the truly soulless ones are the Lego fans who don't have any empathy or consideration for other people's passion even if it isn't subject matter they personally share an interest in. "
I think it's just a misunderstanding. In some AFOL communities, minifigs are considered the soul of a set and this set unfortunately excludes them.
@gunther_schnitzel said:
"I didn’t realise one could swap the minerals to different shelves to change up ones display.
Then I read this:
“swap the minerals to different shelves to change up your display“
Nice."
I didn't realize that this set used clever building techniques and transparent Lego bricks to create models.
Then I read this:
'Use clever building techniques and transparent LEGO bricks to create models'
Nice.
@alLEGOry_HJB2810 said:
" @gunther_schnitzel said:
"I didn’t realise one could swap the minerals to different shelves to change up ones display.
Then I read this:
“swap the minerals to different shelves to change up your display“
Nice."
I didn't realize that this set used clever building techniques and transparent Lego bricks to create models.
Then I read this:
'Use clever building techniques and transparent LEGO bricks to create models'
Nice."
Nice.
@yellowcastle said:
"I got a rock."
Damnit! Beat me to it.
@gunther_schnitzel said:
" @alLEGOry_HJB2810 said:
" @gunther_schnitzel said:
"I didn’t realise one could swap the minerals to different shelves to change up ones display.
Then I read this:
“swap the minerals to different shelves to change up your display“
Nice."
I didn't realize that this set used clever building techniques and transparent Lego bricks to create models.
Then I read this:
'Use clever building techniques and transparent LEGO bricks to create models'
Nice."
Nice."
Nice.
@Lyichir said:
" @GBP_Chris said:
" @Lyichir said:
" @Somnium said:
"A souless set. "
This seems cruel to say about any Lego set but especially so about one created by a fellow fan. Somebody put hard work into representing one of their interests in Lego just for someone like you to call it "soulless"."
Agreed, it is very cruel and saying so is a very harsh way to critique a set that could express severe disappointment and dislike, even.
This set is soulless."
I thought maybe I could appeal to people's better nature and suggest voicing their critiques in a way that didn't insult the work and creativity of their fellow builders, but maybe the truly soulless ones are the Lego fans who don't have any empathy or consideration for other people's passion even if it isn't subject matter they personally share an interest in. "
Hi! Welcome to Brickset. You must be new here.
@CC said:
" @danieltheo said:
"I'm not sure how accurate either rendition is but I prefer the amethyst of the original submission - the dark bluish grey surround it now has looks a bit like a overbearing frame and it detracts from the other samples in my opinion."
I don't know if it is more accurate than the submission, but it looks to me like they were trying to mimic the minifig scale geode part, Bricklink ID 49656pb02.
"
@GoldenNinja3000 said:
"Love this set and I like that the geode mimics the actual LEGO brick, but I wish we also got an up-scaled version of the classic crystal piece here! "
Wait...that geode is supposed to be a Mimic? Sold!
@Norikins said:
" @FlatSixLego said:
"I can't wrap my head around how the gold is being constructed. Both frontal cubes are new pieces?"
They are Minecraft heads."
Specifically, they are Minecraft animal heads, with the overhanging chin, and the wide base at the neck.
Oh dear... that's the 5th excellent set under £55 coming on Oct 1st that I'll have a lot of trouble waiting for offers! 21362, 40820, 40809, 10374 and 72046 and thats even before the Winter Village set gets announced. I hope there are some very good GWPs for October!
I actually really want this, it looks great.
Although I completely agree with the comments upthread. It needs a rock monster, a couple of Rock Raider minifigs (Power Miner figures in a pinch) or both.
I might not *love* them for display pieces, but they will look pretty good built into my lego mountain near all the mining equipment . I really wish they would produce a mining truck to minifigure scale (caterpillar 797!)
@gearwheel said:
"The pyrite, amethyst geode, and tangerine quartz look pretty much like what they're supposed to be.
The rhodochrosite is shaped right, but the color is a bit off - it should be more pinkish. I think if Lego did a trans red core faced with trans pink tiles, that would get closer to the actual mineral's color.
The blue fluorite is blue, but it doesn't look much like typical fluorite. Fluorite usually has a cubic habit, so this should be shaped more like the pyrite and rhodochrosite. Fluorite can be octahedral, so I guess this is supposed to be a massive octahedral sample.
The "watermelon" tourmaline is tourmaline-shaped, but it sure isn't watermelon. That variety is red or pink in the center with green edges, like an actual watermelon. This one is yellow or orange at the core, with colorless edges."
This. If, at least, Lego would have made a small plaque (preferably without errors) for each pieces, giving the name and composition then this set would have a fairly good educational value.
Finally a set highlighting my favorite bricks, beautiful transparent pieces & painted gold. I even like the stand even though I don't like brown, it looks really good.
@EtudeTheBadger said:
"Needs a Rock Raiders minifig."
Yeah.
Imo The original submission was WAY nicer in colorsa
I do WANT to like this set, but it's just not quite there for me.
The Pyrite looks fantastic. If nothing else, I might have to pick up a few of those golden mob heads to create some sort of Pyrite Golem at some point.
The Rhodochrosite and Tangerine Quartz look good. Not much to say other than that.
The Amethyst Geode is... eh. Going for the shape of the minifig-scale piece is cute and looks better than the Ideas submission, but it's just not a shape that screams "geode" to me. There's more rock than crystal and there are no pics of the back and it's just a bunch of cheese slopes. If you can swap out the opaque plates/brinks in there with some transparent ones and an off-brand light brick or something, then maybe it'd be okay.
The Watermelon Tourmaline is bad. I can see they tried for a "raw" appearance, but it is not working. Neither are the trans yellow plates over the opaque green SNOT bricks.
The Blue Fluorite is... well it's okay. But I have to admit that green and purple fluorite are my favorite crystals, so having their inclusion missed for the blue variety is a little painful. Though on a second look, it uses opaque green at the base and has a darker chunk that certainly looks purple, so maybe I shouldn't complain too much. The light blue should certainly glow nicely under a blacklight (or some blue LEDs) like the real thing! So perhaps I truly can't fault them on the choice.
The shelves are cute. The choice of nesting them or displaying them separately is a nice choice for a set like this as it gives more options for display. They're also parts-thin enough that I feel like they don't affect the price as much as some of the "18+" sets do with their bases.
Hmm, maybe I DO already like the set. I might have to look to see if I could design my own scaled-up power crystal (or see if someone else has done so) to replace the Tourmaline. But I can't see myself picking this up without at least a small discount or a good GWP to reach and there's the new Halloween stuff still waiting for an excuse in line first (and the Dreamzzz wave that got delayed here in NA).
@Jewels_Hardstone said:
"The light blue should certainly glow nicely under a blacklight (or some blue LEDs) like the real thing! So perhaps I truly can't fault them on the choice."
Trans-light-blue looks fluorescent, but it’s not. Trans-medium-blue doesn’t look fluorescent, but the official internal name for it was trans-fluorescent-blue (or some variant thereof).
@ohrmazd said:
" @Lyichir said:
" @GBP_Chris said:
" @Lyichir said:
" @Somnium said:
"A souless set. "
This seems cruel to say about any Lego set but especially so about one created by a fellow fan. Somebody put hard work into representing one of their interests in Lego just for someone like you to call it "soulless"."
Agreed, it is very cruel and saying so is a very harsh way to critique a set that could express severe disappointment and dislike, even.
This set is soulless."
I thought maybe I could appeal to people's better nature and suggest voicing their critiques in a way that didn't insult the work and creativity of their fellow builders, but maybe the truly soulless ones are the Lego fans who don't have any empathy or consideration for other people's passion even if it isn't subject matter they personally share an interest in. "
Hi! Welcome to Brickset. You must be new here."
Nice.
@PurpleDave said:
"Trans-light-blue looks fluorescent, but it’s not. Trans-medium-blue doesn’t look fluorescent, but the official internal name for it was trans-fluorescent-blue (or some variant thereof)."
Huh, I just tested what I've got next to my bed and you're right, trans-light blue doesn't fluoresce under UV. That kinda sucks.
It does look like there might be some white bricks as a backing, which WOULD fluoresce and the frosted slopes might help catch some of that light, but it's still disappointing.
I quite like this but I'm not sure I like it enough to buy it... but since I'm always saying I want to see more unique, non-IP sets from Ideas, I feel like I ought to buy it on principle :)
Im actually genuinely excited for this, though likely in the minority. Used to be really into collecting gems as a child.
Would sure go well with a UCS Rock Raiders set or a nice big M Tron truck.
This would make a perfect purchase-with-gift...
@Jewels_Hardstone said:
" @PurpleDave said:
"Trans-light-blue looks fluorescent, but it’s not. Trans-medium-blue doesn’t look fluorescent, but the official internal name for it was trans-fluorescent-blue (or some variant thereof)."
Huh, I just tested what I've got next to my bed and you're right, trans-light blue doesn't fluoresce under UV. That kinda sucks.
It does look like there might be some white bricks as a backing, which WOULD fluoresce and the frosted slopes might help catch some of that light, but it's still disappointing. "
I don't recall if white ABS fluoresces, either. With ABS, it's really hit and miss (presumably the same holds true for MABS). For instance, red ABS does glow. It looks almost exactly the same under UV light as it does under white, except I know someone who has a few red 1x2 bricks that have a flame pattern under UV. When Bionicle first came out, I found two distinct batches of old brown parts. One was a very dark shade of purple under UV, and I can't remember what the other color was. I've also got whole minifigs where parts in one color react while other parts in the same color don't (most notably Jawson from Space Police III, but even some of my S1 Spacemen react differently from each other).
Ooh shiny
@MrBedhead said:
"Looks nice, but for me this would mainly be a transparent parts pack"
I have to slightly correct myself here. This would actually look really cool with a quality lighting kit.
@StyleCounselor said:
" @ohrmazd said:
" @Lyichir said:
" @GBP_Chris said:
" @Lyichir said:
" @Somnium said:
"A souless set. "
This seems cruel to say about any Lego set but especially so about one created by a fellow fan. Somebody put hard work into representing one of their interests in Lego just for someone like you to call it "soulless"."
Agreed, it is very cruel and saying so is a very harsh way to critique a set that could express severe disappointment and dislike, even.
This set is soulless."
I thought maybe I could appeal to people's better nature and suggest voicing their critiques in a way that didn't insult the work and creativity of their fellow builders, but maybe the truly soulless ones are the Lego fans who don't have any empathy or consideration for other people's passion even if it isn't subject matter they personally share an interest in. "
Hi! Welcome to Brickset. You must be new here."
Nice."
How very dare you.
@Crux said:
" @StyleCounselor said:
" @ohrmazd said:
" @Lyichir said:
" @GBP_Chris said:
" @Lyichir said:
" @Somnium said:
"A souless set. "
This seems cruel to say about any Lego set but especially so about one created by a fellow fan. Somebody put hard work into representing one of their interests in Lego just for someone like you to call it "soulless"."
Agreed, it is very cruel and saying so is a very harsh way to critique a set that could express severe disappointment and dislike, even.
This set is soulless."
I thought maybe I could appeal to people's better nature and suggest voicing their critiques in a way that didn't insult the work and creativity of their fellow builders, but maybe the truly soulless ones are the Lego fans who don't have any empathy or consideration for other people's passion even if it isn't subject matter they personally share an interest in. "
Hi! Welcome to Brickset. You must be new here."
Nice."
How very dare you."
Strange voices are sayin'
Oooh, what did they say?
Things I can't understand.
It's a cruel, cruel summer.
@StyleCounselor said:
" @ohrmazd said:
" @Lyichir said:
" @GBP_Chris said:
" @Lyichir said:
" @Somnium said:
"A souless set. "
This seems cruel to say about any Lego set but especially so about one created by a fellow fan. Somebody put hard work into representing one of their interests in Lego just for someone like you to call it "soulless"."
Agreed, it is very cruel and saying so is a very harsh way to critique a set that could express severe disappointment and dislike, even.
This set is soulless."
I thought maybe I could appeal to people's better nature and suggest voicing their critiques in a way that didn't insult the work and creativity of their fellow builders, but maybe the truly soulless ones are the Lego fans who don't have any empathy or consideration for other people's passion even if it isn't subject matter they personally share an interest in. "
Hi! Welcome to Brickset. You must be new here."
Nice."
Mean, actually, that's kind of the point.
Love this one much more then the new death star
Dull. Subject is dull Build looks dull. Aesthetic looks dull. Dull
Not for me, but I have a very good friend who is geologist
@taalrob said:
"Love this one much more then the new death star"
This is actually what was left of Alderaan after the Death Star was through with it.
Now this is a great display piece.