LEGO Star Wars Imperial Remnant AT-AT with INT-4 official images!
Posted by CapnRex101,
The Mandalorian and Grogu was finally released last week, featuring the prototype AT-AT walker originally seen in Star Wars Rebels and inspired by Joe Johnston and Ralph McQuarrie's sketches of the AT-AT for The Empire Strikes Back.
75454 Imperial Remnant AT-AT with INT-4 contains 1453 pieces and it will be released on August 1st, costing £139.99, $159.99 or €159.99. There are seven figures included, with the Imperial Remnant Snowtrooper and its new helmet notable among them.
View high resolution images after the break...
114 likes
71 comments on this article
Weird. In the Legends continuity (aka the true continuity), prototype AT-ATs were first used much earlier, during the Clone Wars.
I like it. I just don't know why we need to have Mando and Grogu in every single set.
Not as overpriced as some new SW sets, especially for one with pretty big dimensions, not bad. Pretty good set overall tbh.
That said, how many AT-ATs do we need, and why won't they give us an AT-ACT?
Say no to Kenner mini-rigs.
@sunko13 said:
"I like it. I just don't know why we need to have Mando and Grogu in every single set."
Because Grogu sells. That's what they're convinced of.
This is as close as we're getting to a minifig scale Jedi: fallen Order set, isn't it? :(
This is kinda neat - cheaper than the previous one, and with more pieces? Looks to be similar in size too... And it comes with a whole extra ship! Especially including the new helmets... this looks to be a really nice success! The cockpit sticker looks a little flat is my main criticism, but I know the front is a lot less dimensional than the normal AT-AT anyway.
@jkb said:
" @sunko13 said:
"I like it. I just don't know why we need to have Mando and Grogu in every single set."
Because Grogu sells. That's what they're convinced of."
Well, they are the main characters from this movie, and typically the lead characters appear in most LEGO sets tied to a specific movie (see Harry Potter, for instance).
Also, who doesn't like little Gizmo, ehm, Grogu...?
@EtudeTheBadger said:
"Weird. In the Legends continuity (aka the true continuity), prototype AT-ATs were first used much earlier, during the Clone Wars."
Bruh, I know it's a tangent but the old-EU was always ready to be jetisoned at a moments notice, look at the Prequel Trilogy stomping over the original Clone Wars and Boba Fett's origin; then The Clone Wars animated series messing with the lore of Mandalorians. Disney terminating the old EU and letting it rest, was a more gracious thing to it than George Lucas had ever given it with his willingness to bulldoze the EU at any time. Now Legends gets to stand on its own, and I wouldn't ever call it the "true timeline," especially seeing how many Legends authors like James Luceno and Timothy Zahn were brought into Disney Canon as well, I can't throw rocks at either era seeing how much of the same DNA both share. Really the only timeline I can call "true" is the theatrical film & TV series canon (excluding Holiday Specials, Droids & Ewoks cartoons and movies from that), and everything else is supplemental to that.
With that said... LEGO's hesitance to touch the EU has always frustrated me. Hasbro tosses out Kyle Katarn or all the KOTOR characters on occasion, LEGO has always hesitated to do the same for some reason. I wouldn't mind seeing the Legends characters in a once yearly set, replacing where Rebuild the Galaxy had been as a sort of "Star Wars infinities" subtheme.
This is actually a masterpiece. It's just about the best playscale AT-AT they've ever done, second only to 75288 from 2020. Even the price is reasonable. Can't wait to see the reviews!
The sticker as front windows kills it. Sad.
@sunko13, Mando and Grogu are very important components of this scene in their eponymous movie.
@alLEGOry_HJB2810, the AT-ACT was in a movie ten years ago and this is in a movie today.
@EtudeTheBadger said:
"Weird. In the Legends continuity (aka the true continuity), prototype AT-ATs were first used much earlier, during the Clone Wars."
Well since this story is set in a post-Empire time when a network of warlords is retaining power through existing assets (which is why so many of the troops look not as pristine as they usually do), this still could be decades old and from that era.
Also, this design being inspired by concept art doesn’t necessarily mean it is a concept model in the story and could just be a different model than the ESB and ROTJ ones.
@sunko13 said:
"I like it. I just don't know why we need to have Mando and Grogu in every single set."
Suspect it’s because a) the movie is based around them, being the main title characters and b) they’re heavily featured in this scene
@GotMeBrickedUp said:
" @sunko13 said:
"I like it. I just don't know why we need to have Mando and Grogu in every single set."
Suspect it’s because a) the movie is based around them, being the main title characters and b) they’re heavily featured in this scene"
I think the main reason is LEGO's philosophy that you already in each set need the action that it's about. A vehicle chasing needs someone to chase, a icecream truck needs a customer, an AT-AT vehicle needs a good guy to fire at.
That being said, I have round 15 Din Djardins in various forms now,... I'd also love to see some other figures.
@FlatSixLego said:
"That being said, I have round 15 Din Djardins in various forms now,... I'd also love to see some other figures."
I think the only one I've ended up with is wearing a festive scarf, although I did make my own with a Jango torso and an erased-and-sharpied helmet back when the show was new and exciting.
@sunko13 said:
"I like it. I just don't know why we need to have Mando and Grogu in every single set."
Because not everyone can afford every set. The kid's parents may have to pick and choose. Therefore, the "heros" are in each. Think about how many Clone Wars Ahsokas were in the old Clone Wars sets.
At least Lego gets this one right... errr... maybe.
@alLEGOry_HJB2810 said:
"That said, how many AT-ATs do we need, and why won't they give us an AT-ACT?"
Because it's one of the most famous designs from Stars Wars ever, as a toyline there essentially needs to be at least one on shelves at any given time. Combine this with how small of a shelf-life toys have (it's been getting smaller and smaller every year), new products are needed to design these niches semi-frequently.
You're not expected to purchase every release of a staple design.
We see them being used in Rebels and the Jedi series
Is INT-4 the little flying doodad, or is it the name of a character? Or both, I suppose is possible.
(Questions I don't have to ask about most franchises...)
5 o'clock shadow troopers!
@xboxtravis7992 said:
" @EtudeTheBadger said:
"Weird. In the Legends continuity (aka the true continuity), prototype AT-ATs were first used much earlier, during the Clone Wars."
Bruh, I know it's a tangent but the old-EU was always ready to be jetisoned at a moments notice, look at the Prequel Trilogy stomping over the original Clone Wars and Boba Fett's origin; then The Clone Wars animated series messing with the lore of Mandalorians. Disney terminating the old EU and letting it rest, was a more gracious thing to it than George Lucas had ever given it with his willingness to bulldoze the EU at any time. Now Legends gets to stand on its own, and I wouldn't ever call it the "true timeline," especially seeing how many Legends authors like James Luceno and Timothy Zahn were brought into Disney Canon as well, I can't throw rocks at either era seeing how much of the same DNA both share. Really the only timeline I can call "true" is the theatrical film & TV series canon (excluding Holiday Specials, Droids & Ewoks cartoons and movies from that), and everything else is supplemental to that.
With that said... LEGO's hesitance to touch the EU has always frustrated me. Hasbro tosses out Kyle Katarn or all the KOTOR characters on occasion, LEGO has always hesitated to do the same for some reason. I wouldn't mind seeing the Legends characters in a once yearly set, replacing where Rebuild the Galaxy had been as a sort of "Star Wars infinities" subtheme."
Bruh, George Lucas jetisoned his own canon all the time, the PTs overwrote most the details in the OT. In the original script for TESB Luke meets Anakin's spirit on Dagobah as Darth Vader was different person. Leia being his sister was just added in ROTJ too.
somehow just looks really uninteresting to me?
@Djhorn said:
"Well since this story is set in a post-Empire time when a network of warlords is retaining power through existing assets (which is why so many of the troops look not as pristine as they usually do), this still could be decades old and from that era.
Also, this design being inspired by concept art doesn’t necessarily mean it is a concept model in the story and could just be a different model than the ESB and ROTJ ones. "
Nope, Wookieepedia makes it abundantly clear that the prototype's first deployment was against the Rebel Alliance.
@iwybs said:
" @alLEGOry_HJB2810 , the AT-ACT was in a movie ten years ago and this is in a movie today."
I still have faith...
Rogue One is the best SW movie, just sayin'.
@Nuclearxpotato said:
" @alLEGOry_HJB2810 said:
"That said, how many AT-ATs do we need, and why won't they give us an AT-ACT?"
Because it's one of the most famous designs from Stars Wars ever, as a toyline there essentially needs to be at least one on shelves at any given time. Combine this with how small of a shelf-life toys have (it's been getting smaller and smaller every year), new products are needed to design these niches semi-frequently.
You're not expected to purchase every release of a staple design."
Fair enough.
I just don't get why, with all the AT-AT versions they've been making, they somehow missed the coolest one :(
@sunko13 said:
"I like it. I just don't know why we need to have Mando and Grogu in every single set."
They're not. 75460.
@Andrusi said:
"Is INT-4 the little flying doodad, or is it the name of a character? Or both, I suppose is possible.
(Questions I don't have to ask about most franchises...)"
It's the "little flying doodad." Based on Kenner's mini-rig from 1980 or 1981.
I love it, for a reason I can't really understand... that said, where is that all-terrain mouse droid ?
On the back of the box, above the INT-4, there seems to be some kind of filename displayed:
"LP13_70_5 21763508_1 MA BOTTOM"
I wonder if it will be printed on the real boxes.
@alLEGOry_HJB2810 said:
" @iwybs said:
" @alLEGOry_HJB2810 , the AT-ACT was in a movie ten years ago and this is in a movie today."
I still have faith...
Rogue One is the best SW movie, just sayin'.
@Nuclearxpotato said:
" @alLEGOry_HJB2810 said:
"That said, how many AT-ATs do we need, and why won't they give us an AT-ACT?"
Because it's one of the most famous designs from Stars Wars ever, as a toyline there essentially needs to be at least one on shelves at any given time. Combine this with how small of a shelf-life toys have (it's been getting smaller and smaller every year), new products are needed to design these niches semi-frequently.
You're not expected to purchase every release of a staple design."
Fair enough.
I just don't get why, with all the AT-AT versions they've been making, they somehow missed the coolest one :(
"
What’s the coolest one?
@EtudeTheBadger said:
" @Djhorn said:
"Well since this story is set in a post-Empire time when a network of warlords is retaining power through existing assets (which is why so many of the troops look not as pristine as they usually do), this still could be decades old and from that era.
Also, this design being inspired by concept art doesn’t necessarily mean it is a concept model in the story and could just be a different model than the ESB and ROTJ ones. "
Nope, Wookieepedia makes it abundantly clear that the prototype's first deployment was against the Rebel Alliance."
See, supplementary things like that get changed all the time too. It's easy enough for someone to introduce the AT-AT into a Clone Wars story and change the details of anything that came from a Cross-Section book or a Visual Dictionary with that earlier appearance. It was the Star Wars: Republic comic with the battle on Jabiim that brought the AT-AT to the Clone Wars in Legends to begin with, although not really anything else had suggested their presence before elsewhere although Jabiim was kept consistently as a planet where repulsorlift craft wouldn't consistently work forcing the use of walkers (even Empire at War played with that, forcing more reliance on treaded and walking vehicles if you fought on that planet).
I kind of like the AT-AT being an Imperial exclusive design though, its height and instability but imposing look all scream "TARKIN DOCTRINE" in a way that the squat AT-TE doesn't. So Disney Canon so far keeping it an Imperial vehicle exclusively is not a choice I can complain about.
@sunko13 said:
"I like it. I just don't know why we need to have Mando and Grogu in every single set."
I mean, isn’t it just because their movie is currently in theaters?
It looks reasonably priced, it is something that the remnants of the Empire would dig up to use as the actual gear got eliminated for them.
@FlatSixLego said:
" @GotMeBrickedUp said:
" @sunko13 said:
"I like it. I just don't know why we need to have Mando and Grogu in every single set."
Suspect it’s because a) the movie is based around them, being the main title characters and b) they’re heavily featured in this scene"
I think the main reason is LEGO's philosophy that you already in each set need the action that it's about. A vehicle chasing needs someone to chase, a icecream truck needs a customer, an AT-AT vehicle needs a good guy to fire at.
That being said, I have round 15 Din Djardins in various forms now,... I'd also love to see some other figures."
Attack of the Mando Clones!
@xboxtravis7992 said:
" @EtudeTheBadger said:
" @Djhorn said:
"Well since this story is set in a post-Empire time when a network of warlords is retaining power through existing assets (which is why so many of the troops look not as pristine as they usually do), this still could be decades old and from that era.
Also, this design being inspired by concept art doesn’t necessarily mean it is a concept model in the story and could just be a different model than the ESB and ROTJ ones. "
Nope, Wookieepedia makes it abundantly clear that the prototype's first deployment was against the Rebel Alliance."
See, supplementary things like that get changed all the time too. It's easy enough for someone to introduce the AT-AT into a Clone Wars story and change the details of anything that came from a Cross-Section book or a Visual Dictionary with that earlier appearance. It was the Star Wars: Republic comic with the battle on Jabiim that brought the AT-AT to the Clone Wars in Legends to begin with, although not really anything else had suggested their presence before elsewhere although Jabiim was kept consistently as a planet where repulsorlift craft wouldn't consistently work forcing the use of walkers (even Empire at War played with that, forcing more reliance on treaded and walking vehicles if you fought on that planet).
I kind of like the AT-AT being an Imperial exclusive design though, its height and instability but imposing look all scream "TARKIN DOCTRINE" in a way that the squat AT-TE doesn't. So Disney Canon so far keeping it an Imperial vehicle exclusively is not a choice I can complain about. "
Empire at War mentioned as well that old Clone Wars comic.
@Denmark_Dragon said: "somehow just looks really uninteresting to me?"
I'm with you on that. For us who don't follow the Mandalorian franchise it's just a skinnier, less iconic variant of a vehicle done better dozens of times already. My first thought was of that Gary Larson drawing of a street scene where everything has those weird tall and skinny proportions, with the caption: "Far Side Light - not particularly funny, but much healthier".
The highlight for me would be the Warlord in his flying file cabinet.
@sunko13 said:
"I like it. I just don't know why we need to have Mando and Grogu in every single set."
Probably because it's their movie lol
@sunko13 said:
"I like it. I just don't know why we need to have Mando and Grogu in every single set."
Next thing you're going to ask is why Spider-Man is in every Spider-Man set!
That new AT-AT Driver looks awesome; probably the best version we’ve had.
@xboxtravis7992 said:
" @EtudeTheBadger said:
" @Djhorn said:
"Well since this story is set in a post-Empire time when a network of warlords is retaining power through existing assets (which is why so many of the troops look not as pristine as they usually do), this still could be decades old and from that era.
Also, this design being inspired by concept art doesn’t necessarily mean it is a concept model in the story and could just be a different model than the ESB and ROTJ ones. "
Nope, Wookieepedia makes it abundantly clear that the prototype's first deployment was against the Rebel Alliance."
See, supplementary things like that get changed all the time too. It's easy enough for someone to introduce the AT-AT into a Clone Wars story and change the details of anything that came from a Cross-Section book or a Visual Dictionary with that earlier appearance. It was the Star Wars: Republic comic with the battle on Jabiim that brought the AT-AT to the Clone Wars in Legends to begin with, although not really anything else had suggested their presence before elsewhere although Jabiim was kept consistently as a planet where repulsorlift craft wouldn't consistently work forcing the use of walkers (even Empire at War played with that, forcing more reliance on treaded and walking vehicles if you fought on that planet).
I kind of like the AT-AT being an Imperial exclusive design though, its height and instability but imposing look all scream "TARKIN DOCTRINE" in a way that the squat AT-TE doesn't. So Disney Canon so far keeping it an Imperial vehicle exclusively is not a choice I can complain about. "
Currently the earliest usage of the AT-AT prototype is 18 BBY. They're used during the invasion of Mon Cala. But that could always change.
I’m entirely and completely in favour of the main characters of a thing being in as many kits for that thing as feasible, largely because there are kids out there — and most Star Wars sets are still meant to be at least a little bit for kids — who will only get one set. Or no sets, and be begging spare minifigs from friends with richer parents.
(Also, I saw how many of the Rogue One wave you’d have to get to assemble the team and was extremely unimpressed.)
The canon argument taking place in the comments reminds me of the glory days of online Trek fandom in the late 90s and early 2000s; punctilious fights about foreheads and all.
Good times!
@Hiratha said:
"(Also, I saw how many of the Rogue One wave you’d have to get to assemble the team and was extremely unimpressed.)"
It seems like the way it goes is that for movies with an ensemble cast you've got to buy just about every set in the wave to get everyone, and when there's only one lead (or one and an accessory-sized second) you get a copy in nearly every set. Which does make sense.
So much grey... again :(
@RogueWhistler said:
" @Hiratha said:
"(Also, I saw how many of the Rogue One wave you’d have to get to assemble the team and was extremely unimpressed.)"
It seems like the way it goes is that for movies with an ensemble cast you've got to buy just about every set in the wave to get everyone, and when there's only one lead (or one and an accessory-sized second) you get a copy in nearly every set. Which does make sense."
Baze and Chirrut, at least, should have been in the same set.
I like that very much
I love this. Ill be buying this and the Imperial Shuttle. I'm glad both aren't downsizes too.
I just compare this set side by side with the Republic TinyTank and...there is no comparison
They really need this movie to succeed, even if it's just merch sales, huh
@LusiferSam said:
"Say no to Kenner mini-rigs."
Boooooooooo!!
We want more Kenner mini-rigs!
I am not into this set, but will try to build me that int-4. Need a cap-2 as well!
Maybe it's just emphasized by the perfectly straight legs in that first picture, but those Technic liftarms on the inside of the legs really bother me...
A Mandalorian and an AT-AT... I can't help but think of the Legends story Where Boba Fett was able to hijack one and use it to destroy an Imperial garrison.
@xboxtravis7992 said:
"With that said... LEGO's hesitance to touch the EU has always frustrated me. Hasbro tosses out Kyle Katarn or all the KOTOR characters on occasion, LEGO has always hesitated to do the same for some reason. I wouldn't mind seeing the Legends characters in a once yearly set, replacing where Rebuild the Galaxy had been as a sort of "Star Wars infinities" subtheme."
I would *love* that. My dream set has long been Mara Jade's Z-95, with Corran Horn's X-Wing in second place. I also wouldn't say no to a Moldy Crow or Raven's Claw.
@Nuclearxpotato said:" @alLEGOry_HJB2810 said:"That said, how many AT-ATs do we need, and why won't they give us an AT-ACT?"
Because it's one of the most famous designs from Stars Wars ever, as a toyline there essentially needs to be at least one on shelves at any given time. Combine this with how small of a shelf-life toys have (it's been getting smaller and smaller every year), new products are needed to design these niches semi-frequently.
You're not expected to purchase every release of a staple design."
Doesn't mean you *can't,* though. I have every minifig-scale Y-Wing (not counting the one in 75365).
@Oeuf0platieN said:
"I love it, for a reason I can't really understand... that said, where is that all-terrain mouse droid ?"
Disassembled by Grogu.
It’s kind of sad to see a character get a generic name like “Imperial Remnant Warlord”, even if he does apparently have a fairly minor role. I wonder if the rest of the Shadow Council, should they be so fortunate as to get figures, will get the same treatment and give us another Knights of Ren situation. Of course excluding Gideon, Hux, and Pellaeon, since they were lucky enough to have been established before and namedropped in the Mando season three episode where the group made its debut.
@Kre_O said:
" @xboxtravis7992 said:
" @EtudeTheBadger said:
"Weird. In the Legends continuity (aka the true continuity), prototype AT-ATs were first used much earlier, during the Clone Wars."
Bruh, I know it's a tangent but the old-EU was always ready to be jetisoned at a moments notice, look at the Prequel Trilogy stomping over the original Clone Wars and Boba Fett's origin; then The Clone Wars animated series messing with the lore of Mandalorians. Disney terminating the old EU and letting it rest, was a more gracious thing to it than George Lucas had ever given it with his willingness to bulldoze the EU at any time. Now Legends gets to stand on its own, and I wouldn't ever call it the "true timeline," especially seeing how many Legends authors like James Luceno and Timothy Zahn were brought into Disney Canon as well, I can't throw rocks at either era seeing how much of the same DNA both share. Really the only timeline I can call "true" is the theatrical film & TV series canon (excluding Holiday Specials, Droids & Ewoks cartoons and movies from that), and everything else is supplemental to that.
With that said... LEGO's hesitance to touch the EU has always frustrated me. Hasbro tosses out Kyle Katarn or all the KOTOR characters on occasion, LEGO has always hesitated to do the same for some reason. I wouldn't mind seeing the Legends characters in a once yearly set, replacing where Rebuild the Galaxy had been as a sort of "Star Wars infinities" subtheme."
Bruh, George Lucas jetisoned his own canon all the time, the PTs overwrote most the details in the OT. In the original script for TESB Luke meets Anakin's spirit on Dagobah as Darth Vader was different person. Leia being his sister was just added in ROTJ too. "
Broheim.
Bro-dude.
Brotherman.
Brohimator.
Oh, bruddah.
@Brickodillo said:
" @LusiferSam said:
"Say no to Kenner mini-rigs."
Boooooooooo!!
We want more Kenner mini-rigs!
I am not into this set, but will try to build me that int-4. Need a cap-2 as well!"
I thought that flying cardboard box looked familiar.
They didn't quite get the angle correct though.
Was LEGO drunk when they priced this? 1400 pieces, 6 minifigs…all for $160? That’s a really good deal for SW.
@Vindicare said:
"Was LEGO drunk when they priced this? 1400 pieces, 6 minifigs…all for $160? That’s a really good deal for SW. "
Shhhhhhh They're always listening :)
Whoever says the sticker for the cockpit is alright clearly doesn’t collect Lego since too long.
@Hiratha said:
" @alLEGOry_HJB2810 said:
" @iwybs said:
" @alLEGOry_HJB2810 , the AT-ACT was in a movie ten years ago and this is in a movie today."
I still have faith...
Rogue One is the best SW movie, just sayin'.
@Nuclearxpotato said:
" @alLEGOry_HJB2810 said:
"That said, how many AT-ATs do we need, and why won't they give us an AT-ACT?"
Because it's one of the most famous designs from Stars Wars ever, as a toyline there essentially needs to be at least one on shelves at any given time. Combine this with how small of a shelf-life toys have (it's been getting smaller and smaller every year), new products are needed to design these niches semi-frequently.
You're not expected to purchase every release of a staple design."
Fair enough.
I just don't get why, with all the AT-AT versions they've been making, they somehow missed the coolest one :(
"
What’s the coolest one?"
Well I think it's the AT-ACT from Rogue One. Best vehicle from the best SW movie.
What’s with cheaping out on the cladding for the inner side of the legs? Like, seriously Lego?
@yamaki said:
"Whoever says the sticker for the cockpit is alright clearly doesn’t collect Lego since too long."
Don't try to speak for me. I've been playing with Lego since 1973, and I don't hate stickers.
@alLEGOry_HJB2810 said:
" @Hiratha said:
" @alLEGOry_HJB2810 said:
" @iwybs said:
" @alLEGOry_HJB2810 , the AT-ACT was in a movie ten years ago and this is in a movie today."
I still have faith...
Rogue One is the best SW movie, just sayin'.
@Nuclearxpotato said:
" @alLEGOry_HJB2810 said:
"That said, how many AT-ATs do we need, and why won't they give us an AT-ACT?"
Because it's one of the most famous designs from Stars Wars ever, as a toyline there essentially needs to be at least one on shelves at any given time. Combine this with how small of a shelf-life toys have (it's been getting smaller and smaller every year), new products are needed to design these niches semi-frequently.
You're not expected to purchase every release of a staple design."
Fair enough.
I just don't get why, with all the AT-AT versions they've been making, they somehow missed the coolest one :(
"
What’s the coolest one?"
Well I think it's the AT-ACT from Rogue One. Best vehicle from the best SW movie."
And, it's easy to shoot apart.
Imagine if the blasters had no effect.
@TheOtherMike said:
" @xboxtravis7992 said:
"With that said... LEGO's hesitance to touch the EU has always frustrated me. Hasbro tosses out Kyle Katarn or all the KOTOR characters on occasion, LEGO has always hesitated to do the same for some reason. I wouldn't mind seeing the Legends characters in a once yearly set, replacing where Rebuild the Galaxy had been as a sort of "Star Wars infinities" subtheme."
I would *love* that. My dream set has long been Mara Jade's Z-95, with Corran Horn's X-Wing in second place. I also wouldn't say no to a Moldy Crow or Raven's Claw."
The release of LSW sets with Kyle Katarn could make me behave financially irresponsible (did you read that, Lego?)
@BigDaddy89 said:
" @TheOtherMike said:
" @xboxtravis7992 said:
"With that said... LEGO's hesitance to touch the EU has always frustrated me. Hasbro tosses out Kyle Katarn or all the KOTOR characters on occasion, LEGO has always hesitated to do the same for some reason. I wouldn't mind seeing the Legends characters in a once yearly set, replacing where Rebuild the Galaxy had been as a sort of "Star Wars infinities" subtheme."
I would *love* that. My dream set has long been Mara Jade's Z-95, with Corran Horn's X-Wing in second place. I also wouldn't say no to a Moldy Crow or Raven's Claw."
The release of LSW sets with Kyle Katarn could make me behave financially irresponsible (did you read that, Lego?)"
Same here, especially if they also threw in a Jan Ors.
Whoa, they're making Mini-Rigs!
That would be a fun thing to have in various kits or sold individually.
The best AT-AT was in 75298 - it can balance on its rear legs!
@LusiferSam said:
"Say no to Kenner mini-rigs."
Why? They already in the Lego Star Wars Skywalee Saga videgame too
Did the article initially give the U.S. price as $139.99?
Or did I read the U.K. price?
Or is my brain just scrambled...?
@560heliport said:
"Did the article initially give the U.S. price as $139.99?
Or did I read the U.K. price?
Or is my brain just scrambled...?"
$159.99usd
You could have a scrambled brain.
Your cognitive system is overloaded, mental fog or attentional dysregulation.
Possibly your thoughts won’t organize, attention won’t hold, and memory keeps misfiling things.
Take more Vitamin B12, D, sleep more, exercise more.
If those don't work, starting drinking while building lego to focus more ;)
Great price for the piece count and size, and seems like a nice design...
Canon and anti-Disney-Star Wars discussion, kinda pathetic.
I should get this one when it hits the 20% discount at least.