New trailer released for The LEGO Movie 2: The Second Part!

@That_Guy8 You can see him at around 2:01, as the shot pans down from the waterfall slide.

Ok, NOW I'm hyped.

Since the primary form we've seen Watevra Wa'nabi in is a horse, I wonder if she might have some secret family connection to Unikitty and Puppycorn. I also wonder whether the horse form will be the only form we see for her in sets.

The Duplo monster Batman fights is really cute. It's often really neat to see what kinds of wild and crazy Duplo builds people have managed to come up with outside of sets, since by using stuff like construction vehicle elements together with printed facial features and wacky colors there's a definite possibility for some much wackier and more elaborate creations than the kind you see in sets. There's rumored to be one actual Duplo set tied to The LEGO Movie 2, so my curiosity is growing for what that might turn out to be.

It's great to see the Unicastle and Puppycorn confirmed for at least a cameo appearance!

The "your worst nightmare" joke is hilarious and I'm amazed that I haven't heard that joke in more shows and cartoons considering what a cliche "I'm your worst nightmare" is and the really versatile potential it has for different goofy punchlines.

Overall not as many huge surprises or obvious new set teasers here as I was perhaps hoping for, but it was certainly a very good trailer that gives me great confidence in the caliber of writing and humor we can expect this time around!

Rex Dangervest is easily gonna be the highlight of this movie. He’s a mix of Han Solo, Indiana Jones, Owen Grady, and The Lone Ranger. IM IN. This is easily one of my top must see movies for 2019.

Also... DID THEY TURN THE BATCAVE INTO AN APOCOLYPSE BUNKER ?????? really hoping for an Mad Max style Batmobile!

@TheBrickPal: Additionally, I don't think there was ever any reason to think that the second movie would be ALL about that or that focusing on that would even make for a good movie. Same as how The Incredibles 2 wasn't all about the Underminer. In both cases, the "A new enemy approaches!" ending was more about what it added to each of those movies than about its sequel potential.

For The Incredibles, the Underminer's appearance and the Parr family suiting up to stop him helped create a "happy ending" beyond just defeating the bad guy by conveying that the family was going to keep fighting crime together and that it would create a lasting change in their family dynamic. If anything, the Incredibles 2 subverted this implied "happy ending" and new, shared sense of purpose by having that fight go horribly wrong, forcing them back into a life of struggling with the illusion of normalcy before the movie's actual main conflict kicks off.

With The LEGO Movie, the Duplo invasion was practically a gag ending that provided one last laugh after an otherwise calm, poignant, and heartfelt resolution to the main conflict. It also implied that this new shake-up to the status quo was going to have bigger and longer lasting repercussions than just a peaceful return to the free society that Wyldstyle had described before Lord Business's reign.

Perhaps more importantly, when the filmmakers announced that they were working on a sequel that would come out a few years after The LEGO Movie, that alone should have told us that the Duplo invasion wouldn't be the sole subject, because when one of a movie's major characters is a live-action child actor, then three to five years later there's no way they're still going to look close enough to the same age to convince audiences that no meaningful time has passed between the original and the sequel.

That's not a bad thing, though! After all, in a story where the state of the entire universe is defined by childhood creativity and family dynamics, way more new storytelling opportunities open up by presenting the family at different stages in their life than by keeping the "storytellers'" ages and family dynamics the same or similar.

Even before we had any details about the sequel besides that there would be one a few years after the first, one of the most exciting possibilities to me was the prospect of seeing how Finn's relationship to the LEGO world his imagination shaped would change as he got older and possibly moved closer to the "dark ages" that are such a big part of many AFOLs' life stories.

It seems like even beyond that, we're also going to see how Finn's sister's imaginative play evolved from the infancy that brought about the Duplo invasion (driven by impulsivity and perhaps difficulty understanding of the kind of more elaborate world and stories Finn was interested in crafting) to discovering her own interests that might conflict with Finn's changing interests in more complicated ways.

I'm really thrilled about the possibilities, much more so than I would have been with a story representing how an eight and a half year old deals with the chaos of a messy, destructive, or annoying toddler.

Sooooo, we just not gonna talk about the Giraffe Suit guy dancing with Superman then?