Harry Potter golden Minifigures revealed!
Posted by Huw,2021 marks the 20th anniversary of the first Harry Potter sets so to celebrate, this summer's releases will each contain a golden minifigure, which have just been revealed on Instagram.
The six figures -- Harry Potter, Voldemort, Ron Weasley, Hermione Granger, Severus Snape and Quirinus Quirrell -- also come with a gold minifigure plate and wand.
151 likes

100 comments on this article
Quirrell seems an odd choice to be one of the six
There are a lot of other characters I personally would have preferred.
...Quirrell? Not Dumbledore?
Seems like an odd choice to have the professor who didn't even outlast book 1 instead of the one who was a guiding figure for Harry through the entire series, but okay I guess.
These figures aren't particularly interesting to me, but I'll reserve judgement until I see the summer sets themselves.
I would've preferred replicas of the classic Lego Harry Potter Minifigures. These gold Minifigures aren't that exciting to me but I could definitely see its appeal to other people.
I'm not a fan of Lego continuing to celebrate Harry Potter considering recent things with the author, but I'll leave it at that. I won't be personally supporting it anyway, and that's all I'll say on the matter because this isn't the forum for it.
Quirrel definitely is a weird choice over Dumbledore though.
I would be surprised if they don't end up making a Dumbledore. I can see it being a lot like what happened with Wu this year. The 4 ninja (these 6 characters) revealed first then Wu (Dumbledore) revealed later in a bigger set.
I’m not a big HP fan, never have been. But I’m pleased that there will be more gold minifigure parts for MOCing. Their rarity, though, could mean the parts are expensive on the secondary market.
I'm more excited for those golden plates.
Also shame the figures are not based on first Lego ones.
Golden Dumbledore sure to be a VIP or GWP polybag in the summer, or much like Golden Master Wu with Ninjago Gardens, a golden Dumbledore could be reserved for a large D2C later in the year
Gold figures? Yay...it’s the 90s!
I'm not a big fan of Harry Potter, but if I remember correctly then Quirrell may have been Lego's very first double sided head in existence. So from an HP standpoint he may not be consequential, but from a Leo standpoint a game-changer.
Man, it's been 20 years since I collected my first LEGO Harry Potter sets as well as LEGO Creator Harry Potter: https://brickset.com/sets/ownedby-LegoSonicBoy/theme-Harry-Potter
I still don't know exactly what promo got me the McGonagall and Dobby minifigs. I know it was a promo because there was also an old light grey baseplate that was cut to an arbitrary size, as well as a Harry Potter logo sticker across multiple tiles.
Seems a little odd to be celebrating 20 years of a theme that had a six-year period with no sets at all.
Did quirrell predate Zam wesel?
Does it really count as a 20th anniversary even though the theme hasn't actually been on shelves for, what, half of those years? At least the Star Wars and Ninjago ones felt like they'd earnt it from actually doing the time, feels very much like hopping on the bandwagon for the sake of it.
What's surprising is that these are NOT a repeat of Mr. Gold in that every set has one. But honestly, I'd kinda prefer the way they did it for Star Wars. Perfect replicas of the early HP figs.
@ohrmazd said:
"Did quirrell predate Zam wesel? "
Yes, Harry Potter & The Philosopher's Stone and it's tie-in Lego sets were released in 2001, Attack of the Clones and it's sets in 2002
@Minifig_Jez said:
"Quirrell seems an odd choice to be one of the six
There are a lot of other characters I personally would have preferred."
Quirrell was the first minifig with a double sided head, so maybe it has to do with that?
@Minifig_Jez:
In terms of the overall theme, Quirrell doesn’t make a lot of sense over Dumnledore, McGonagall, Draco, or several other characters. In terms of the 20th anniversary, he was the main villain of the first movie.
@Bhahouighf:
Yeah, I don’t think gold-in-the-dark is a thing, though...
@CaptainRogers:
He was. That was the first time that a double-sided head was truly unavoidable, since the character had a double-sided head and showed both faces at the same time. For most others, they could have just as easily packed two heads with different single-sided print.
@CaptainRogers:
HP1 was released in 2001. Ep2 followed half a year later in 2002. We probably didn’t even know what a Clawdite was when the Quirrell minifig hit shelves.
Seriously LEGO? If you're gonna celebrate 20 years of Harry Potter, a line that has been on a complete hiatus from 2011 until 2018, you should give the same treatment to Bionicle, which also launched 20 years ago in 2001. And I argue Bionicle has had a much bigger impact on LEGO as a whole than the original line of Harry Potter sets did.
@Minifig_Jez said:
"Quirrell seems an odd choice to be one of the six
There are a lot of other characters I personally would have preferred."
Heu.... this is for the 20 anniversary of philosopher's stone, and Quirrell is one of the most important character in this book and movie because of the end :/
Any guesses on what the sets are based on the backdrops?
@LeeGoPieces said:
"I'm not a fan of Lego continuing to celebrate Harry Potter considering recent things with the author, but I'll leave it at that. I won't be personally supporting it anyway, and that's all I'll say on the matter because this isn't the forum for it.
Quirrel definitely is a weird choice over Dumbledore though."
Lego has made it clear they are associated with warner bros and not jk rowling
thanks to jalc_45 for telling me that
I definitely want those golden minifigure plates. Kinda "meh" on the figures themselves. With the recent Ninjago wave, at least there is an in-story explanation for the gold ninjas. Maybe they will be useful for Sovereign MOCs from the MCU?
As long as these are simply pearl gold aka warm gold instead of metallic or chrome gold, I can't be bothered with these figs at all.
@AustinPowers Couldn’t agree more.
The golden figs is kind of a lame idea.
How do you get them?
Are the old hair pieces even in production anymore?
I'm a big Harry Potter fan and I think these are pretty cool but I'm also not hot to get them because a gold minifig doesn't make a lot of sense to me, particularly if they will just be in random sets that you have no idea if the gold fig is included or not. I don't participate in lotteries.
Picking Quirrel instead of Dumbledore, Sirius Black, Ginny Weasly, Remus Lupin or even Draco Malfoy is a pretty bonehead move.
it should have been dumbledore not quirrel
@graymattr said:
"I'm a big Harry Potter fan and I think these are pretty cool but I'm also not hot to get them because a gold minifig doesn't make a lot of sense to me, particularly if they will just be in random sets that you have no idea if the gold fig is included or not. I don't participate in lotteries.
Picking Quirrel instead of Dumbledore, Sirius Black, Ginny Weasly, Remus Lupin or even Draco Malfoy is a pretty bonehead move."
Each minifig will come in their respective sets. For example, let's say Harry will be in set X. Each set X on shelves will have the golden Harry in it. It's not a lottery
Dumbledore will likely be a promotional giveaway through S @H .
These aren't really "must have" for me, but I'm sure the sets they come in will be. I'll end up having them all by default. The golden wands are the most exciting part, imho.
I was right! I wrote a long 3-comment series last year on why I predicted HP would get anniversary minifigs in sets. Sadly I don't remember which article it was on, but those three comments were some of the last. I will update if I find out which article it was.
Edit: Found it! It wasn't last year, but time seems to pass so slowly these days... See the end of third comment for my minifig predictions.
https://brickset.com/article/57357/ninjago-concept-artwork- (2009-2015) Include parentheses in url.
@Orange_Jooze said:
"Any guesses on what the sets are based on the backdrops?"
At least some of the backdrops can be identified. The flooring behind Harry originates from the second floor girls' bathroom and the door behind Hermione is the entrance to the third floor corridor.
Honestly, I find these golden minifigures quite uncreative. They work nicely for NINJAGO but reproducing original Harry Potter minifigures would have been more appropriate than these golden designs in my opinion, recalling the Star Wars twentieth anniversary range.
@CapnRex101 said:
" @Orange_Jooze said:
"Any guesses on what the sets are based on the backdrops?"
At least some of the backdrops can be identified. The flooring behind Harry originates from the second floor girls' bathroom and the door behind Hermione is the entrance to the third floor corridor.
Honestly, I find these golden minifigures quite uncreative. They work nicely for NINJAGO but reproducing original Harry Potter minifigures would have been more appropriate than these golden designs in my opinion, recalling the Star Wars twentieth anniversary range."
I don’t see it, but ooo, hints! There also seems to be a whole paragraph quoted I can’t see in your post. Edit- can see your full post now.
I don’t agree with everyone saying that Quirrel is the “odd one out” in this line-up, whilst to me, the book/movie 4-7 Voldemort is the one they should’ve replaced with Dumbledore. The other figures are all based on book/movie 1 (Except maybe Snape, who could pass for the other movies as well)
@TomKazutara said:
"Where is the 20 years Bionicle celebrations ?"
As much as I would have loved to have seen Bionicle instead, I think as far as marketability goes Potter is the bigger audience. Lego knows Bionicle only brings in existing Lego fans, and a subset at that (i.e. usually a late-20's to mid teen's age range of people who remember the original line fondly). Whereas Potter is something that can be marketed to much wider audiences, I know plenty of people who are not "AFOL's" in the same sense we are on this site in that they don't live and breathe Lego and Lego news, but they own lots of Harry Potter sets because they love the franchise.
Of course, the Potter franchise has been stirred into the author controversy these last few years, and there is a growing anti-Potter sentiment (someone admitting they are a Potter fan in some circles online is a way to ensure they get bombarded with comments saying stuff like "Anti-Potter League Dear God Read Another Book Already" or something along those lines). Not to mention the franchise's own story efforts to continue like Fantastic Beasts 2 have been painful to watch and got embroiled in casting controversies too. Personally, my nostalgia for Potter is pretty strong since the height of their popularity was at a key point in my childhood (the same era Bionicle, the Star Wars Prequels, etc. were all at their peak too) so the franchise still is something I enjoy but the franchise has lost its luster these last few years in particular. Despite this, there are clear real-world benefits that came from peak Potter fandom, West Coast Railways in the UK for example was able to use Olton Hall (the engine used to represent the Hogwarts Express) to help fund their other steam railway efforts, and now make passive income from the lease agreement they have with Warner Bros. to display the locomotive at the Potter Studio Tour. I.E. actual historical preservation groups have been "Midas touched" by being lucky enough to be associated with Potter in some form or another.
This is a shame because when the Lego theme re-launched with that spectacular launch wave right before Fantastic Beasts 2 had come out, Cursed Child was still fresh in theaters and the author wasn't yet caught up in controversy, I was off a fresh visit to Universal Studios Hollywood where I got to walk the streets of Hogsmeade, and it had been the most excited for Harry Potter I had been in years. I wish Potter fandom could have stayed in that zone, instead of degrading to well whatever moment we are in now (and a lot of that has to do with the author's own choices). The Lego sets still remain a highlight though.
Well, time to spend a foolish amount of money to get them all XD
Why not Quirrell? That character's a huge part of minifigure history. We may not have double-sided heads without him!
@Minifig_Jez said:
"Quirrell seems an odd choice to be one of the six
There are a lot of other characters I personally would have preferred."
They were the first six HP minifigures released as part of the original sets.
Personally I never cared for HP or HP sets but you know who else is having their 20-year anniversary this year? That's right, the Lord of the Rings films and sets. So while I can't fully appreciate the HP reissues, I do applaud LEGO's intention, and even more so that it gives me some hope that some 20th anniversary reissues will happen in the LotR universe as well.
Seriously, AFOL’s are the biggest bunch of whiners on the planet!!!
The first dozen-odd comments here are all negative to extremely negative!
I’m not even a Harry Potter fan, but seeing 20th anniversary gold minifigs on gold baseplates has gotten my attention & interest: I think they are cool collectables! If you buy a set with 1 and don’t like it, please send them my way!
Big, old "no thanks".
I'll still buy the sets as Lego has done quite well designing HP sets but golden minifigs don't appeal to me. I'd sell them straight away if I had an easy means to do so.
I don’t see why they didn’t do Dumbledore
more interested in sets, bc I just love fun builds and need more hp sets in my life :>>> I never had any old sets as this was my dark ages time...
as for gold minifigs... shiny is shiny and I like it X"D
This sure makes us Ninjago fans feel special
@lemish34 said:
"The first dozen-odd comments here are all negative to extremely negative!"
Nope. Mine was 6th and while I said I wasn’t into HP and was concerned about the possible price, I was pleased there were more gold parts for MOCing.
@lemish34 said:
"I’m not even a Harry Potter fan, but seeing 20th anniversary gold minifigs on gold baseplates has gotten my attention & interest..."
Post 7 expressed pleasure at the prospect of gold baseplates.
**moderator deleted thread**
Def agree that these are an odd decision for how to commemorate the line lol. Though gold minifig parts are interesting... hopefully they won't be too expensive on the aftermarket. Ironically the only harry potter sets I have are from 2001-2002, it would have been kinda nice to see those again like with SW. (The ninjago gold figures I think work, it doesn't feel out of place at all, even Golden Wu)
Other than display, I don't see a use for these.
Quirrel makes sense if we consider him to be also Voldy but he doesn’t make sense alongside Voldemort.
No gold Draco? His father will be hearing about this!
Perhaps we could refrain from repeating the discussion concerning J. K. Rowling and focus upon the minifigures. Any subsequent off-topic comments will be removed.
Thank you!
I think a better choice would've been minifigures made to look like how the characters appear in the artwork of the book covers. That would've been interesting to see, would provide a new variant of the cast, and be a neat little way to celebrate the theme being around for so long.
The golden turbin is nice. And the minifigure stands...
Gotta admit, as cool as these look, I'd have preferred they did the same as the Star Wars anniversary figures
I wouldn't buy these if they were sold separately, but if they are included in the Harry Potter sets, I'll probably be getting them.
@Ldnruggerlad said:
" @Minifig_Jez said:
"Quirrell seems an odd choice to be one of the six
There are a lot of other characters I personally would have preferred."
They were the first six HP minifigures released as part of the original sets."
Dumbledore was also in the 2001 sets, in Hagrid's Hut and the Castle sets, unless the 2001 sets came out in two waves, which I don't think they did. - So I'm not sure these six can be called the first six.
The other explanation (which many have pointed out above) that Quirrell was the first minifig with a double sided head, makes more sense as a reason why he's included.
I'm just hoping this means an official reveal of the sets is going to happen soon. Gold figures are an interesting idea for this and they look well above-average (they had to recolor all the parts in gold this time around, it's not like Ninjago where they reuse the same hood piece). I agree with some people that remakes of the old figures would've been cool, though, and I usually prefer the newer ones vastly so that kind of says something.
@Milo_Hilo_26 said:
"Lego has made it clear they are associated with warner bros and not jk rowling
thanks to jalc_45 for telling me that"
I'll try not to get into politics but this is worth noting, the last time I can name a set taking directly from the books was the Peeves figure from the original Hogwarts Castle.
@Trigger_ said:
"I'm just hoping this means an official reveal of the sets is going to happen soon. Gold figures are an interesting idea for this and they look well above-average (they had to recolor all the parts in gold this time around, it's not like Ninjago where they reuse the same hood piece). I agree with some people that remakes of the old figures would've been cool, though, and I usually prefer the newer ones vastly so that kind of says something.
@Milo_Hilo_26 said:
"Lego has made it clear they are associated with warner bros and not jk rowling
thanks to jalc_45 for telling me that"
I'll try not to get into politics but this is worth noting, the last time I can name a set taking directly from the books was the Peeves figure from the original Hogwarts Castle."
Exactly, and that was like 20 years ago.
I like these..
I shall call him Goldermort! Lol..
Shame there's no Dumbledore or Gold Draco even a Luna maybe a Golden Dobby would be great but on Instagram there is a hint of Gold Hedwig to be released!
Fairly certain we're likely to see Golden Dumbledore as a future reveal. So everyone just settle down.
@Andhe said:
"Fairly certain we're likely to see Golden Dumbledore as a future reveal. So everyone just settle down."
Agreed. This selection rather suggests that more key characters will follow.
Despite being a huge HP fan, I can't say I'm too fussed about these. Don't see how they're gonna work in my Hogwarts, Diagon Alley, Hogwarts Express or Quidditch displays. I'll probably be buying some of the sets though so I may end up owning some. Maybe I'll change my mind when I see them in the flesh.
What a great bunch of iconic Harry Potter characters and also Quirrell
No Gandalf?
All I can say is that Dumbledore is my favorite Jedi in Star Trek.
@CCC:
LotR was 2001-2003, so absolutely the 20th anniversary of the film trilogy. You’re thinking The Hobbit, which ran 2012-2014, and is only on its ninth anniversary.
@Minifig_Jez:
Dumbledore, Hagrid, Draco, Peeves, the Gryffindor Knight, and the Chess Queen were all released the first year, along with five of these six characters. I suspect Quirrell may have gotten in as the first main villain, but more because he was also the first appearance of Voldemort (who merited inclusion even though he did not get a minifig the first year).
@Trigger_:
No, Peeves was based on the movie as well. There was a British comedian who was cast in the role and did film at least one scene, which got cut from the first film for reasons that are not clear. They never brought him back for subsequent films, so Peeves never got a second minifig.
What a lot of awful, tacky gimmickry. I'm sure plenty of people will fall over themselves to empty their pockets for these but i think they look tawdry.
Why not improve old sets designs but keep the costs down by leaving out, oh i don't know, maybe some unnecessary extra figure?
@PurpleDave said:
" @CCC:
LotR was 2001-2003, so absolutely the 20th anniversary of the film trilogy. You’re thinking The Hobbit, which ran 2012-2014, and is only on its ninth anniversary.
@Minifig_Jez:
Dumbledore, Hagrid, Draco, Peeves, the Gryffindor Knight, and the Chess Queen were all released the first year, along with five of these six characters. I suspect Quirrell may have gotten in as the first main villain, but more because he was also the first appearance of Voldemort (who merited inclusion even though he did not get a minifig the first year).
@Trigger_:
No, Peeves was based on the movie as well. There was a British comedian who was cast in the role and did film at least one scene, which got cut from the first film for reasons that are not clear. They never brought him back for subsequent films, so Peeves never got a second minifig."
Was there ever a record of Peeves' character design? Because it really looks like LEGO was going off nothing making the minifigure. Because of that, I'm not so sure it can really be called film-sourced beyond the intent to include the character.
@8BrickMario:
There’s not a lot of info at all. The actor was Rik Mayall. He did an interview about it that didn’t really get public notice until after he’d passed away, so you can’t ask him for any details. He said he filmed for three weeks, but the extras kept giggling during his scenes, so they cut him from the movie. He then said that he still got paid regardless, and he thought the film was garbage (though based on his quotes, it’s unclear if he just genuinely hated the film, or if he was grinding an axe over having his scenes cut).
So, I don’t know of any footage that made it out of the studio, and the only stills I was able to dig up could be photoshopped (since he’s glowing blue in one, that’s pretty clearly fake, but there’s another shot where he’s kinda grey and hazy). Whatever the case, the design team would have had access to all kinds of character studies, and that could have included an unpublished publicity shot of Mayall in full costume and makeup. Currently your best bet for a clear answer would be to find one of the original design team for the HP theme.
@Zander said:
" @lemish34 said:
"The first dozen-odd comments here are all negative to extremely negative!"
Nope. Mine was 6th and while I said I wasn’t into HP and was concerned about the possible price, I was pleased there were more gold parts for MOCing.
@lemish34 said:
"I’m not even a Harry Potter fan, but seeing 20th anniversary gold minifigs on gold baseplates has gotten my attention & interest..."
Post 7 expressed pleasure at the prospect of gold baseplates.
"
Way to cherry-pick, Zander.
Perhaps I should have said 90% of all posts here are negative.
My comment still stands about the general negativity oozing all over this news item!
Okay, these are appealing, but I would have preferred Dumbledore and Hagrid make an appearance.
Also, why not do a classic minifigure line-up like they did for the 2019 Star Wars sets? I think that might’ve been better.
@bananaworld said:
"
No Gandalf?"
No Harry Hobbitt either.
@gunther_schnitzel:
All Hobbitts are Harry. Just look at their feet!
@PurpleDave said:
" @CCC:
LotR was 2001-2003, so absolutely the 20th anniversary of the film trilogy. You’re thinking The Hobbit, which ran 2012-2014, and is only on its ninth anniversary.
But Lego didn't make anything with LotR till the hobbit movies were coming.... Where as with harry potter they made sets back for the first film. So CCC is right.
"
Why can't they do this for Star Wars? Why does Star Wars always get the boot for exclusives? Oh, you want an exclusive? Cool, we'll throw in an original figure but put a 20th Anniversary logo on the back of the fig to ruin it.
@Derp_Riot said:
"Why can't they do this for Star Wars? Why does Star Wars always get the boot for exclusives? Oh, you want an exclusive? Cool, we'll throw in an original figure but put a 20th Anniversary logo on the back of the fig to ruin it."
You're right, Star Wars never gets enough exclusives
That's enough jokes for today
Like some people have said, kinda weird selection for some of the figs.
These are weird as heck
@legolove365 said:
"Personally I never cared for HP or HP sets but you know who else is having their 20-year anniversary this year? That's right, the Lord of the Rings films and sets. So while I can't fully appreciate the HP reissues, I do applaud LEGO's intention, and even more so that it gives me some hope that some 20th anniversary reissues will happen in the LotR universe as well."
I totally agree, bring back LOTR and finish the story with epic sets from epic scenes!
Celebrating 20 years is weird as we had a big break from HP LEGO sets.
Sorry for many but I like them.
There are rumors of a larger D2C set this summer. I wouldn’t be surprised if Dumbledore was in it.
I think these are awesome and will look spectacular as a display. I might even put them all on stands like the Hogwarts architect! The recent sets have been of a superior standard and show case outstanding creativity and design. More please Lego!
I think it’s a nice gesture and the figures will collect dust nicely. Hopefully they aren’t the main selling point of the current year sets.
@AgentKallus:
Ah, right, that makes sense. Looking up the theme, it appears LotR actually only ran two years, with 7 sets, two polybags, and at least one promo minifig in 2012 (can't remember if Frodo popped up as a convention freebie in 2012 or the year before), and a followup run of 5 sets in 2013. The Hobbit got 7-8 releases per year for the full three years, although there were three polybags, one convention exclusive set, and a whopping five promotional minifigs spread across that run.
Anyways, all I really care about right now is that I'm still waiting on the third installment of the LEGO: The Hobbit videogame, and there's still no set for the Balrog of Moria. A set of the White Tree of Gondor wouldn't hurt, either.
Talk about Golden Trio...
@Brickulator93 said:
"Are the old hair pieces even in production anymore? "
And do not forget about the old gray to properly replicate the old school uniforms...
A Golden Hagrid would have been a better option than a Golden Voldemort.
Hagrid being a main Character and Voldemort being .... meh... hardly ever there until the last two films.
I really don't care about the gold minifigs but I am curious about the sets in which they will be included.
@graymattr said:
"I'm a big Harry Potter fan and I think these are pretty cool but I'm also not hot to get them because a gold minifig doesn't make a lot of sense to me, particularly if they will just be in random sets that you have no idea if the gold fig is included or not. I don't participate in lotteries.
Picking Quirrel instead of Dumbledore, Sirius Black, Ginny Weasly, Remus Lupin or even Draco Malfoy is a pretty bonehead move."
Sirius, Ginny, and Remus all played next to no role in the first book. This is the anniversary of The Philosopher's Stone movie and Lego sets. In the book Quirrell was the bad guy. Maybe there will be more sets to come?
However, if they keep up this trend of anniversary gold figures, we should get Dumbledore for the following series The Chamber Of Secrets, as one of the sets was Dumbledore's Office.
Lego was in for a hiding here no matter what they did, if they copied the Star Wars 20th celebration & did yellow faced tributes to the original ones, people would have moaned. They did gold ones, people moaned! Grow up you big kids! Lego did a nice thing, but them if you like them or don’t... it’s your choice!!!
@CCC:
7 sets in 2012 + 5 sets in 2013 = 12 sets
Two polybags plus 2nd Age Elrond (that’s your third polybag)
There was also a Frodo build event to kick things off, where the only exclusive item was a velour drawstring pouch to put the minifig in.
I skipped the sword because Bricklink doesn’t catalog it, and it was barely a build event (there was a bin that you pulled very basic parts from, no packaging, and no take-home instructions). That is something that you’ll never get agreement on whether it should be counted as a set or not.
For The Hobbit, there were 14 regular sets, three regular polybags, and five minifigs, according to Bricklink. The minifigs included your other two polybags (Bilbo and Legolas), two with SDCC packaging (Azog and Bard), and one with an exclusive card that looks similar in size to a standard playing card (an elf from Hobbit3). The remaining item was the SDCC micro scale Bag End, which makes 23 releases (8+8+7). I did miss Bain/Bard and another Bilbo because the Blu-Rays were cataloged as Gear. I know the Blu-Ray Bilbo shipped in one of those minifig clamshells like DK Books uses, rather than an sealed polybag, so maybe that’s where the distinction comes in. Regardless, that would bump up the promo minifig releases to seven.
Now, is that everything? I can’t remember if they did a LotR pack for Nintendo DS or not, but I know for PotC that’s where a “unique” Jack Sparrow (that could be made from common parts) popped up.
@Hojojicek:
They didn’t use the old colors for the SW20 minifigs. Lando’s head/hands, and Han’s and Leia’s hair were all reddish-brown.
My money's on Hogwarts Year One Gold Series
To me this isn't quite as exciting as the golden Ninjago minifigures, but those gold minifig stands sound awesome!
But uh... why Quirrell? Based on the main trio these seem to be Philosopher's Stone variants, but even in that film Dumbledore and Hagrid played a bigger role. He was the first fig with a double sided head so that's cool, but then you'd expect them to cut Voldemort 'cause he's already in the series.
They look...meh.
I would be way more into them if LEGO had gone the Star Wars approach and done a version of the original 2001 designs, even if in gold. I'll still get them all as I always buy the entire Harry Potter line of sets, but still...meh.
Harry Potter Fans: Why didn't they include Dumbledore as one of the 20th anniversary minifigures?
Lord of the Rings Fans: don't complain
Psst! Let's not tell them, but Voldemort wasn't featured in either the books, movies, or Lego sets until Year 4... he hasn't reached his 20th anniversary yet!
@undead_rising:
Well, not corporeal Voldemort, but he was a wart on the back of Quirrell’s head in HP1, and a sepia-toned flashback in HP2.
@LegoSonicBoy said:
"Man, it's been 20 years since I collected my first LEGO Harry Potter sets as well as LEGO Creator Harry Potter: https://brickset.com/sets/ownedby-LegoSonicBoy/theme-Harry-Potter
I still don't know exactly what promo got me the McGonagall and Dobby minifigs. I know it was a promo because there was also an old light grey baseplate that was cut to an arbitrary size, as well as a Harry Potter logo sticker across multiple tiles."
...and don't forget the promo Harry Potter Series Minifies from San Diego Comic Con: Voldemort in a bag given out for going booth to booth at the event....(Warner Bros booth, Lego Booth, some other booth...)
@CaliforniaUncleRich:
I heard of this being done with Frodo (or was it Bilbo?), but not with any other IP. There were four stations that got you the legs, torso, head, and hair, with an exclusive velour bag thrown in at one of the stations. The minifig itself was straight out of a retail set, so they weren’t quite as flippable as one of the carded SDCC minifigs, I suspect.
Maybe Quirrell is included because he’s the very first minifig to have a double-sided head?