75329 Death Star Trench Run official images!

Posted by ,
Death Star Trench Run Diorama

Death Star Trench Run Diorama

©2022 LEGO Group

Images of 75329 Death Star Trench Run have been published on Amazon.es, revealing the new Diorama Collection!

This set contains 665 pieces and costs €59.99. Equivalent models suggest prices of £54.99 or $59.99 elsewhere. The model will apparently be released on the 1st of May.

Additional images are available below, including a preview of another set in this series.


Are you impressed with this model? Let us know in the comments.

93 comments on this article

Gravatar
By in United States,

Seems a bit like a gift with purchase set, rather than a direct purchase set.

Gravatar
By in United States,

Pretty cool, but an easy pass. It looks great & makes for a nice display piece. Love the greebling that is the Death Star.

Gravatar
By in United States,

These look great. I may get them, and I don’t even collect Star Wars.

Gravatar
By in Norway,

The trench run is not impressive, and Yoda's hut doesn't look to great from this angle either. A lot of work clearly went into the trench, but they should have put more effort into the ship designs.

Gravatar
By in Brazil,

Four micro starfighters like the ones we get in polybags almost every year and a bunch of random grey parts on a large plate.

Nope.

Star Wars has been by far one of the worst themes of 2022. Now I'm already hoping for its end this year indeed.

Gravatar
By in Australia,

Greeble-tastic

Not for me, but I'm sure lots will love it.

Gravatar
By in Australia,

Not bad, a very nice rendition of the Death Star. But I’d take Yoda’s Hut over it.

Gravatar
By in United States,

EXCELLENT looking Trench-Run.
Great details, all the greebling and lovely new style for the mini-X-Wing.
Yoda's Hut looks great too.
BOTH must gets!

Gravatar
By in United States,

GWP for may 4th yes with 120-200 $ purchase but as an Set to buy for 60 $ sorry lego NO THX. another set and time wasted.

Gravatar
By in United States,

Looks ok, but I’m so glad I built JKBrickworks edition. Love the fact that it’s a simple movement incorporated and better ships.

Gravatar
By in Netherlands,

Not a Star Wars collector either, but I do quite like this! And if I see it a a nice discount, I might just buy it...

Gravatar
By in United States,

Evokes the model at Legoland. Always liked looking at it and pushing the laser sound effect buttons.

Gravatar
By in United States,

To those criticizing these sets and the SW theme in general: I'm curious what specific changes you would augment to meet your expectations? How would you design them differently, and why?

The LEGO Group has many direct outlets for constructive feedback on their products. Perhaps we need an article outlining those means?

Gravatar
By in Australia,

Pretty much is an upscaled version of 40407

Gravatar
By in United States,

I'm gonna steal the greeble techniques.

Gravatar
By in United States,

So much negativity here; I personally love that LEGO is making more vignette style sets

Gravatar
By in United States,

Will be great at 75% off

Gravatar
By in United States,

As much as I love sets like this, it feels a bit MEH, for the price. Details, greebles, all good stuff, just not that impressive for $60. I'd rather add $100 and get the DeLorean!

Gravatar
By in United Kingdom,

@oceanone said:
"GWP for may 4th yes with 120-200 $ purchase but as an Set to buy for 60 $ sorry lego NO THX. another set and time wasted."

Really? Time wasted? Please.

You can’t please everyone (or every oceanone). I think generally people would prefer to be able to purchase sets rather than hit thresholds for a GWP that might be hard to get/unavailable.

I’m only a casual SW fan, and don’t buy the theme, but these look great.

Gravatar
By in United States,

@BCHaut said:
"To those criticizing these sets and the SW theme in general: I'm curious what specific changes you would augment to meet your expectations? How would you design them differently, and why?

The LEGO Group has many direct outlets for constructive feedback on their products. Perhaps we need an article outlining those means?"


Are you implying that criticism of the set is only valid if it is addressed to LEGO? Or is your comment in good faith and you actually care? Your tone is a little vague.

Gravatar
By in Canada,

I've never really liked microscale sets. SW or not. So the trench run is not for me. I kind of like the Dagobah set (I saw it on various leaks). It looks good, but I have the small Yoda's hut from a couple of years ago and it fits perfectly in my display, so I will not get this one.

SW has not been great in 2022 so far. I don't like display sets (i.e. helmets) and there has been few play sets. I did enjoy the BP and the minifig packs. But the rest has been underwhelming (I got 75326 today, so I'll know if I like it or not when I build it later this weekend).

I heard we were going to get Luke's landspeeder as a UCS in May too. This has to be the least excited I have been for a UCS set in years... I'm not too excited by other rumors as well, except for the rumored AT-TE.

Gravatar
By in United States,

They've gotten microscale X-Wings perfect before, why the change here? Rest looks great.

Gravatar
By in United States,

I love these things, I have a shelf dedicated to the other four above the TVs in the LEGO room. A lot of gray or not, I’ll have this one and Yoda’s hut too.

Gravatar
By in Brazil,

I love vignettes but for this price I prefer a minifigure scale starship. I admire the number of details from the Death Star trench, though.

Gravatar
By in France,

I’m in the ‘not a Star Wars collector but these might tempt me’ camp too, but wow, I did not expect the negativity greatest hits already playing in the comments section!

Gravatar
By in United Kingdom,

@Rimefang said:
"Seems a bit like a gift with purchase set, rather than a direct purchase set."

probably not with that many pieces

Gravatar
By in United States,

Does feel a little overpriced, but I still love this. Part of it is the fact that I just adore minimodels, and these are very interesting to me. The regular TIEs are okay, but I just adore the Advanced. The X-Wing is also very weird- I don't think I love it, and something more in line with 4484 or 30051 would have been better, but an interesting iteration, nonetheless. I'm really looking forward to getting and building this. Seems much better for $60 than the N-1.

Gravatar
By in United States,

I’ll get it to go next to my Bespin Duel. It will be both of Luke and Vader’s interactions from the first two films of the trilogy. Now if they’ll release a throne room scene from RotJ in that style it would be a perfect trio of sets.

Gravatar
By in United Kingdom,

Not a big star wars collector but am a fan of the movies little vignettes like these are great for us more casual star wars fans I think.

Gravatar
By in United States,

I actually quite like the trench run except for the TIE Fighters. I feel like they need a new piece to make these work - basically what the wings are shaped like now, but with no studs on top so they can be printed.

Yoda’s hut is cute but we got a decent Yoda’s hut not long ago. I’m not sure a piece of an X-wing and some swampy trees are really striking enough to warrant this display.

Gravatar
By in United States,

Whoever designed this has a good eye for creating interesting "mechanical noise". Whenever I draw machines larger than an automaton, I overthink every little detail and don't know how to just fill the space with pipes and gears and wedgets and flanksteaks and whatnot.

Maybe that comes with time and engineering knowledge?

Gravatar
By in Germany,

Looks similar to the last few GWP sets.
I didn't like those either.

Gravatar
By in United States,

I hope the Dagobah set has unique figures, but from the blurry image I think they are the same as 75208 Yoda's Hut.

Gravatar
By in Germany,

I've been wanting Lego to make these kind of sets for ages - display-oriented sets that don't break the bank and take up loads of space like the UCS sets do.

Interestingly, the rumours about the Trench Run set said it contained 666 pieces. I wonder if it actually does but they didn't want that number on the box.

Gravatar
By in Netherlands,

Despite its piece count, that Trench Run set should only be 30 euros, 40 at most. All these "18+" sets are incredibly overpriced. The X-wing looks terrible, it does not even have engines like the polybag versions. Nice R2 print though. Easy pass.

The Dagobah set looks pretty good, might get that. Though for such an expensive Dagobah set it would've been nice to finally get a Force Ghost minifigure.

Gravatar
By in United States,

This is reminiscent of 40407 Death Star II Battle and we already have a Yoda's Hut (75208)!

Gravatar
By in Canada,

Minifigure scale would be cool, but im not big on microscale stuff. For what it is i'd say it's not bad

Gravatar
By in United Kingdom,

Star Wars GWP: "This should be a set!"

Star Wars set: "This should be a GWP"

Repeat ad nauseum.

On a more serious note, it's interesting that they've gone for two different scales in the same "theme". Can't remember the last time they did that. Also I really like that they've worked the laser cannon piece from the original 1999 X-Wing into the greebling.

Gravatar
By in United States,

@Dotanuki said:
" @BCHaut said:
"To those criticizing these sets and the SW theme in general: I'm curious what specific changes you would augment to meet your expectations? How would you design them differently, and why?

The LEGO Group has many direct outlets for constructive feedback on their products. Perhaps we need an article outlining those means?"


Are you implying that criticism of the set is only valid if it is addressed to LEGO? Or is your comment in good faith and you actually care? Your tone is a little vague.

"


You're right, my tone was vague. My intention was sincere: there are ways to express criticism directly to the company, and they genuinely want to hear it. Criticism should be valid on any platform, but is perhaps *most* effective when properly directed. I am very curious about what others might suggest for aesthetic changes, rather than a simple expression of disdain. I hope that helps clarify.

Gravatar
By in Spain,

Is that light bley square weblike part in the trench run set a new piece?

Gravatar
By in Puerto Rico,

These look great, but not on my alley.

Gravatar
By in United States,

$60 and $80 USD for these 2 sets total is an absolute joke. Whoever is paying those prices is a sucker, pure and simple. Just bricklink the parts for a MOC for that price.

Gravatar
By in Australia,

There's a lot of negativity here. I understand these are not for everyone, I for example like these reasonably priced sets aimed at adult collectors with a reasonable piece count. I like Lego but it's not my lifestyle, I don't have a 'Lego room' and I don't usually spend more than $200AUD on a single set. The massive AT-AT and Star Destoyer sets approaching $1000 are just too much for me, the hardcore fans just seem to whinge when Lego doesn't do another near-$1000, massive set with 25 minifigs, exclusive prints, no stickers. Some of us just want a nice, small, well designed display piece.

Gravatar
By in Australia,

Interesting they didn't just wait three extra days and release it on May 4th. That said, I do like it and will pick it up eventually.

Gravatar
By in Australia,

As someone who collects SW, I really like this set and vignettes in general, however $100 AUD for 665 pieces seems very pricey.

I do find the balance of display v play interesting/weird so far this year in the SW theme.

Gravatar
By in United States,

Haters be damned — these look incredible.

Gravatar
By in Canada,

Lego can't win (ever). If Lego does a GWP then (1) the buying threshold is too high, or (2) there is not enough available and Lego should instead do a real set that people can just simply buy. Suddenly Lego does a set that people can just simply buy and (1) the price is too high and Lego should instead do a GWP.

To me, the main interest in this set is: there is at least one new part in this set - they morphed the plate modified 2x2 with bar frame octogonal (75397/30033) into a square (bar frame). (not quite sure how this will be useful -if at all - but I tend to like new parts - they usually equal new opportunities)

Gravatar
By in Austria,

nice grey parts pack, but I'm not buying that.

Why people insist on defending Lego's current tendencies (prices up, quality down), I'll never know. My understanding of being a fan doesn't include unquestioningly swallowing everything a brand throws your way.

The Vader Meditation Chamber from last year was a good indicator on what to expect from these "18 plus"-Sets: a brick-built display plate making up the majority of the content, and then the actually useful stuff on top of that.

Gravatar
By in United States,

@BCHaut said:
" @Dotanuki said:
" @BCHaut said:
"To those criticizing these sets and the SW theme in general: I'm curious what specific changes you would augment to meet your expectations? How would you design them differently, and why?

The LEGO Group has many direct outlets for constructive feedback on their products. Perhaps we need an article outlining those means?"


Are you implying that criticism of the set is only valid if it is addressed to LEGO? Or is your comment in good faith and you actually care? Your tone is a little vague.

"


You're right, my tone was vague. My intention was sincere: there are ways to express criticism directly to the company, and they genuinely want to hear it. Criticism should be valid on any platform, but is perhaps *most* effective when properly directed. I am very curious about what others might suggest for aesthetic changes, rather than a simple expression of disdain. I hope that helps clarify. "


That totally does and I appreciate the reply. I agree, it would be great if there were a way of understanding how much Lego listens and incorporates consumer’s recommendations into their product.

Gravatar
By in United States,

Poor choice for the trench run quote, I would've gone with "I have you now."

Gravatar
By in United States,

@JasonBall34 said:
"Evokes the model at Legoland. Always liked looking at it and pushing the laser sound effect buttons."
Too bad those are all gone. No more Star Wars at the parks.

Gravatar
By in United States,

There were rumors of this being 666 pieces, they might’ve replaced two pieces with one to avoid that.

Gravatar
By in United States,

This is the first serious redesign of a micro scale X-Wing since they introduced SW minis about 20 years ago. ‘Bout time! The old design was getting stale, and the cannons on this demonstrate that new parts can lead to huge improvements. As much as I like the R2 print, though, I think I’d have preferred it on a different part, like the Dots jewel tile, or the Bionicle Barraki eye.

@MisterBrickster:
They worked in four elements that were introduced with the original X-Wing. I see two R2 domes, a few lightsaber hilts, and at least one 4L lightsaber blade. I believe the only two new pieces from that set that aren’t present are the cockpit canopy and the X-Wing pilot helmet.

@merman:
@HOBBES:
Not a new part. 30094 debuted in 1997 with the Divers subtheme of Town. I remember getting my first one in 6599, as the frame that the submersible uses as “landing gear” on the ocean floor. It’s older than the Star Wars theme!

@brick_me:
They like to do a May 4th weekend event. This year May 4 falls on a Wednesday. I’m guessing they’ll end the May 4th event on May 4 this year.

@BulbaNerd4000:
Feel free to say that when you buy this.

Gravatar
By in United States,

I need to get about 300 of these to start on my Death Star trench that's the same scale as the X-wing and TIE fighers.

Gravatar
By in Canada,

It's a neat set, but I'm surprised at those who consider this a reasonable price. Yes, it costs less than the UCS sets, but in the last 5-6 years there were a number of Star Wars vignette sets, including Yoda's Hut (75208), Luke's Hut (75200), Darth Vader Transformation (75183), and Carbon-Freezing Chamber (75137), with great scenery, features, and multiple mini figures, for literally half the price, even accounting for inflation. I don't think twice the elements = twice the value in this case.

Gravatar
By in United Kingdom,

@Lochdent said:
"the hardcore fans just seem to whinge when Lego..."

Yep.

Gravatar
By in United States,

@BulbaNerd4000 said:
"Poor choice for the trench run quote, I would've gone with "I have you now." "

Personally I would have preferred it to say:
“Now this is podracing”

One of my greatest desires in life is for a film edit of this scene with Vader saying the podracing line instead of “I have you now.”

Gravatar
By in Canada,

@PurpleDave

Thanks for the precision. Part 30094: Production time: 1997-2020 (now 2022 with this set) Appeared in 35(36) sets of various themes but mostly divers or divers-related. Exists in 7 (somewhat muted) colours.

Gravatar
By in United States,

Here's hoping that R2 print shows up in a cheaper set.

Gravatar
By in Canada,

R2 looks...wrong, like he got put through a 'Flatland' filter...Kinda' makes me wonder: how hard would it be to print on 'top' of a plate or brick? I mean, yeah; the 'target area' is a little smaller. And you'd run the risk of marring the "Lego" logo, but still...

Gravatar
By in United States,

@brick_r:
“Herding cats” hard. Any print on the top of the stud would be entirely dependent on getting the stud aligned with the print, and you’d almost need a computer with a camera feed to make that happen without grinding the line to a halt.

Gravatar
By in Singapore,

@brick_r said:
"R2 looks...wrong, like he got put through a 'Flatland' filter...Kinda' makes me wonder: how hard would it be to print on 'top' of a plate or brick? I mean, yeah; the 'target area' is a little smaller. And you'd run the risk of marring the "Lego" logo, but still... "
Not to mention it'd look even worse. Why would you attempt to print something on such a small and noisy surface and not as large and smooth as possible? Maybe if they made a 1x1 dome and printed that, though I don't know if even that is feasible to print on.

Gravatar
By in Australia,

@chrisaw said:
" @Lochdent said:
"the hardcore fans just seem to whinge when Lego..."

Yep. "


How is criticising or calling out very high prices "whinging"? Honestly, high horses and all that.

Gravatar
By in Turkey,

I'm very impressed with the trench run set. Lego usually don't go to these lengths with greebling. Yet, I'm more interested in minifigure scale playable sets. Not that I don't like the collectible and display sets, I have a couple, but a couple is enough for me. I admire the artsy sets and sets like these from afar.

Gravatar
By in United States,

This set should be $40 USD. The pieces are tiny, so the usual price per piece math to calculate value doesn't work here.

Unfortunately our "gotta have it now" culture means people don't wait for sales to send Lego the message that there is a line they shouldn't cross with prices.

Gravatar
By in United Kingdom,

"So how much greebling do you want on this trench run set?"

"Yes."

Gravatar
By in United Kingdom,

One thing I like about the Trench Run set is there's that piece which was often used as blasters on early SW sets, and we had clear ones (IIRC) for the first version of Anakin's Podracer. That feels like a nice nod to the original SW sets.

Gravatar
By in United States,

Trench is a pass, but Yoda looks good.

Gravatar
By in United Kingdom,

I'm so interested as to how expensive it would be to bricklink the trench run given the large number of relatively small parts... £54.99, if it does turn out to cost that, is absolutely balmy. It looks good otherwise, but I don't quite see where the money's gone here- aside from the fact that LEGO believes that they can charge whatever they like for collectibles. Unfortunately, Star Wars fans prove them right pretty consistently.

Gravatar
By in Netherlands,

Doesn't really do it for me but it looks good.

Gravatar
By in Netherlands,

As a fan of the Architecture line (in which sets always come in the form of micro scale builds) I really like the trench run set, and I will definitely put this on my wanted list. This will be my first Star Wars set. I really like the greebling details of the trench. The pieces will also be very useful for my own micro scale builds.

Actually, I am not that much of a SW fan. In fact, I don't think I have ever watched a SW movie in its entirety. (Yeah I know, burn me...) Most of what I know about SW comes through the LEGO community. But I do know the iconic trench run scene, and I think this set captures it very well (especially when taking the number of pieces into account).

Gravatar
By in United States,

@MorkMan said:
" @JasonBall34 said:
"Evokes the model at Legoland. Always liked looking at it and pushing the laser sound effect buttons."
Too bad those are all gone. No more Star Wars at the parks.
"


Yo what??

Gravatar
By in Norway,

Love how they’ve moved away from Architecture being “only” non play series, and giving so many options for people to have a bit of Lego fun in their life; flowers, art, sketches, brick heads and animals

Gravatar
By in Germany,

I bet when people said they would have bought the mini GWPs they still thought of the sets being in the 20 dollar range with a better price per piece ratio than 10 cents. There are no especially big parts in this set, and nothing special except for 3 prints which honestly is nothing special and wasn't necessary for mini details when the X-Wing behind the cockpit is so strangely designed compared to other mini X-Wings.
I am plain irritated that this is an official product, it looks strange, like a half-baked idea. Like most Rebrickable mocs, it is missing something that tells me that the people behind the model wanted to do this and didn't just do it because it was required.

Gravatar
By in Netherlands,

The good news is that we get new Mini vehicles. They look great and are improved well despite the decades of seeing them before.
The bad news is that it's part of a gratuitous display and costs about 60 euro.

Ah well, I'm sure we'll get something actually affordable again next year...

Gravatar
By in Finland,

Personally I associate "Use the Force, Luke" way more with this scene than the quote they used, but that's just nitpicking

Price isn't very good also

Gravatar
By in Netherlands,

Really big Starwars fan here, I think this looks fantastic and I can hear the John Williams music in my head just looking at this.
But I'm not paying € 60 bucks for this. I'm going to ignore it.
€50 would make me look longingly at it while my inner child and adult mind do a battle royale over my budget.
€ 40 would make me seriously consider buying this.

Gravatar
By in United Kingdom,

Think I'm in the same mind as alot of people on this. While I love the set and the design, at the scale of it it feels about £20 overpriced for me to want to buy it.

Gravatar
By in United Kingdom,

@PurpleDave said:
" @MisterBrickster:
They worked in four elements that were introduced with the original X-Wing. I see two R2 domes, a few lightsaber hilts, and at least one 4L lightsaber blade. I believe the only two new pieces from that set that aren’t present are the cockpit canopy and the X-Wing pilot helmet."

Good point - the wing and engine elements are missing too though, I think. And the 1x2 brick click hinges. There were a *lot* of new parts in that set, although I guess you could say they were for the overall theme rather than one set.

Gravatar
By in Australia,

Wow, apart from the X-Wing poking out of the water, that Yoda's Hut set looks a lot like my modification of 75208 that I posted on the Bricklink gallery a couple of years ago.

Gravatar
By in United States,

@RaiderOfTheLostBrick said:
"Not bad, a very nice rendition of the Death Star. But I’d take Yoda’s Hut over it."

Need any cheese with that whine?

Gravatar
By in United Kingdom,

The new pictures of the Dagobah set that have surfaced on other Lego blogs look really, really good

Gravatar
By in United States,

I'd buy it, for $19.99.

I'll probably just get the instructions and build it with parts I already have.

Gravatar
By in United States,

Looks great but I'll wait for a discount. Yoda's Hut is boring and the compactor set is extremely underwhelming. Pass on both, which...my wallet likes.

Gravatar
By in Netherlands,

Oh yeah!!! Sold all my SW-UCS sets a couple of years ago. But started collecting the helmets, the XL UCS sets en now these sets. It's gonna be SW all over again. Love it!

Gravatar
By in United States,

@Loerwyn:
Yeah, there were clear ones, but they were in 7121 to hood up the STAPs. The two podracer sets used trans-neon-orange for the energy couplings (later podracers used trans-dark-pink, which is a more accurate color). The early SW sets used an older version of this part, with an axle connection being molded into the “point towards enemy” end starting in 2001.

@MisterBrickster:
Oh, wow, yeah. I didn’t actually look up the set inventory, but there are three click-hinge bricks from 1999. One of them was clearly designed to work with the cockpit canopy, which also debuted in the Y-Wing. Late 2001/early 2002, I actually determined that both SW (in three years) and Bionicle (in one year) had introduced over 100 new molds, and I’m not sure I was catching stuff like the click-hinge bricks.

Gravatar
By in United States,

I think it looks pretty solid. I don't love the new X-Wing design, but I'm assuming they changed it because of scale. It doesn't look bad, but I've seen better at smaller scales.

I always gave thought to building this scene, just never got around to it. But per the usual, LEGO usually releases the "MOC" idea anyway, so I never have to worry about creating anything original on my own.

The price is a bit much and I highly doubt I'll see it on sale, so I'll have to consider getting it or bricklinking it and seeing how that price changes things. I don't need the tile that says the quote.

Gravatar
By in Canada,

@Dotanuki said:
" @BCHaut said:
" @Dotanuki said:
" @BCHaut said:
"To those criticizing these sets and the SW theme in general: I'm curious what specific changes you would augment to meet your expectations? How would you design them differently, and why?

The LEGO Group has many direct outlets for constructive feedback on their products. Perhaps we need an article outlining those means?"


Are you implying that criticism of the set is only valid if it is addressed to LEGO? Or is your comment in good faith and you actually care? Your tone is a little vague.

"


You're right, my tone was vague. My intention was sincere: there are ways to express criticism directly to the company, and they genuinely want to hear it. Criticism should be valid on any platform, but is perhaps *most* effective when properly directed. I am very curious about what others might suggest for aesthetic changes, rather than a simple expression of disdain. I hope that helps clarify. "


That totally does and I appreciate the reply. I agree, it would be great if there were a way of understanding how much Lego listens and incorporates consumer’s recommendations into their product."


SW Lego collector since 2009 here. I like what you are saying about feedback directly to Lego but there seems to be a disconnect when it comes to the SW theme. He may be controversial but MandR Productions (youtube) has made a few videos about the difference between what the fanbase gives as feedback or suggestions on SW lego and what Lego actually gives us.

I'm not referring to general feedback, more to the pointed questions they ask and then don't implement ANY of the wants or corrections or when they show complete ignorance of the source material from the designer of a given set. I don't know how many designer videos I've seen where they refer to the model they built by a name it never had or in some general sense.

I love Lego, I love building Lego, I love giving my kids Lego...I stopped buying lego SW sets last year because I was tired of the unjustified (in my mind) price increases and the lack of respect for the SW fanbase as a whole.

EDIT: The Lego SW designers should take a note from the Speed Champions designers. Regardless of your feelings on the theme, the fact the designers listen to the fans is clearly evident in almost every model.

Gravatar
By in United States,

@Sledgeb1: How is indicating a preference between two sets a "whine?" They even said the Trench Run was "very nice."

Gravatar
By in United States,

@Rimefang said:
"Seems a bit like a gift with purchase set, rather than a direct purchase set."

Lots of people keep asking to be able to purchase gwps, so i guess it works out?

Gravatar
By in Canada,

You know, and this kinda' "the flip side" of what I wrote about R2; I really like those TIE front prints...I'm thinking: somekinda' Imperial Drone/Droid, some kinda' "disk" for a computer ('anti-CD'?:))...even a 'drain'/vent...

Return to home page »